Carlos Domínguez-Massa , Tomás Heredia-Cambra , Juan Bautista Martínez-León
{"title":"冠状动脉手术和同时经导管主动脉瓣植入术的混合手术结果","authors":"Carlos Domínguez-Massa , Tomás Heredia-Cambra , Juan Bautista Martínez-León","doi":"10.1016/j.circv.2024.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Coronary artery disease may be present in 40-75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim is to evaluate the safety of a hybrid procedure in which coronary artery bypass grafting and TAVI are performed simultaneously with respect to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic prosthesis implantation with cardiopulmonary bypass.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent TAVI concomitantly with coronary revascularization off-pump were analyzed, consecutively, from when this procedure began in 2017 until the last patient operated on in 2020 (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->19), compared with the cases operated on for biological aortic prosthesis implantation, with cardiopulmonary bypass, concomitantly with surgical coronary revascularization, in the last year 2021 (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->24). Unified Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) parameters were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regarding the preoperative variables, statistically significant differences were found in mean age (77,89<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,91 years in the TAVI group compared to 70,33<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,48 years in the conventional surgery group; p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), and in the rate of vascular disease (63,2% vs. 25%; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,012). No differences were found in the number of coronary anastomoses performed between the two groups. In the postoperative results, only statistically significant differences were found in the rate of paravalvular regurgitation (47,4% vs. 8,3%; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAVI concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be safe with no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of mortality, stroke rate, and reoperations, as well as in the combined endpoints of technical success, device success, early safety, and of clinical efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":42671,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resultados de procedimientos híbridos de cirugía coronaria e implante transcatéter de la válvula aórtica concomitante\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Domínguez-Massa , Tomás Heredia-Cambra , Juan Bautista Martínez-León\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.circv.2024.02.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Coronary artery disease may be present in 40-75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim is to evaluate the safety of a hybrid procedure in which coronary artery bypass grafting and TAVI are performed simultaneously with respect to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic prosthesis implantation with cardiopulmonary bypass.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent TAVI concomitantly with coronary revascularization off-pump were analyzed, consecutively, from when this procedure began in 2017 until the last patient operated on in 2020 (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->19), compared with the cases operated on for biological aortic prosthesis implantation, with cardiopulmonary bypass, concomitantly with surgical coronary revascularization, in the last year 2021 (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->24). Unified Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) parameters were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regarding the preoperative variables, statistically significant differences were found in mean age (77,89<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,91 years in the TAVI group compared to 70,33<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,48 years in the conventional surgery group; p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), and in the rate of vascular disease (63,2% vs. 25%; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,012). No differences were found in the number of coronary anastomoses performed between the two groups. In the postoperative results, only statistically significant differences were found in the rate of paravalvular regurgitation (47,4% vs. 8,3%; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAVI concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be safe with no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of mortality, stroke rate, and reoperations, as well as in the combined endpoints of technical success, device success, early safety, and of clinical efficacy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Cardiovascular\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Cardiovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
40-75%的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)时可能存在冠状动脉疾病。目的是评估冠状动脉旁路移植术和TAVI同时进行的混合手术的安全性,相对于传统的冠状动脉旁路移植术和主动脉假体植入体外循环。方法回顾性分析2017年TAVI合并非体外循环冠状动脉重建术开始至2020年最后一次手术的患者(n = 19),与2021年生物主动脉假体植入术合并体外循环合并手术冠状动脉重建术患者(n = 24)进行对比。采用统一阀门学术研究联盟3 (VARC-3)参数。结果术前变量方面,TAVI组患者平均年龄(77,89±5,91岁)与常规手术组患者平均年龄(70,33±5,48岁)比较,差异有统计学意义;p & lt;0.001),血管疾病发生率(63.2% vs. 25%;p = 0.012)。两组间冠状动脉吻合术数目无差异。在术后结果中,只有瓣旁反流率有统计学意义(47.4% vs 8.3%;p = 0.005)。结论tavi联合冠状动脉旁路移植术是安全的,在死亡率、卒中发生率、再手术等主要终点以及技术成功、器械成功、早期安全性、临床疗效等综合终点均无统计学差异。
Resultados de procedimientos híbridos de cirugía coronaria e implante transcatéter de la válvula aórtica concomitante
Introduction and objectives
Coronary artery disease may be present in 40-75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim is to evaluate the safety of a hybrid procedure in which coronary artery bypass grafting and TAVI are performed simultaneously with respect to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic prosthesis implantation with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Methods
Patients who underwent TAVI concomitantly with coronary revascularization off-pump were analyzed, consecutively, from when this procedure began in 2017 until the last patient operated on in 2020 (n = 19), compared with the cases operated on for biological aortic prosthesis implantation, with cardiopulmonary bypass, concomitantly with surgical coronary revascularization, in the last year 2021 (n = 24). Unified Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) parameters were used.
Results
Regarding the preoperative variables, statistically significant differences were found in mean age (77,89 ± 5,91 years in the TAVI group compared to 70,33 ± 5,48 years in the conventional surgery group; p < 0.001), and in the rate of vascular disease (63,2% vs. 25%; p = 0,012). No differences were found in the number of coronary anastomoses performed between the two groups. In the postoperative results, only statistically significant differences were found in the rate of paravalvular regurgitation (47,4% vs. 8,3%; p = 0.005).
Conclusion
TAVI concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be safe with no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of mortality, stroke rate, and reoperations, as well as in the combined endpoints of technical success, device success, early safety, and of clinical efficacy.