将针对药物使用障碍患者的纯虚拟小组疗法过渡到混合模式

IF 5.1 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tyler S. Oesterle, Nicholas L. Bormann, Domenic Ochal, Stephan Arndt, Scott Breitinger
{"title":"将针对药物使用障碍患者的纯虚拟小组疗法过渡到混合模式","authors":"Tyler S. Oesterle, Nicholas L. Bormann, Domenic Ochal, Stephan Arndt, Scott Breitinger","doi":"10.2147/sar.s460024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181–255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020–2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18–40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50–2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.","PeriodicalId":22060,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model\",\"authors\":\"Tyler S. Oesterle, Nicholas L. Bormann, Domenic Ochal, Stephan Arndt, Scott Breitinger\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/sar.s460024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181–255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020–2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18–40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50–2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/sar.s460024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/sar.s460024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:远程医疗有很多好处,但人们对参加者在现场和虚拟环境(混合模式)下参加小组治疗的药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗效果知之甚少。我们试图确定治疗完成率是否有所不同。患者和方法:COVID-19 大流行引起的政策变化在明尼苏达州农村地区的七个强化门诊(IOP)项目中开展了一项自然观察队列研究。纯虚拟组于 2020 年 1 月 6 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日进行,混合组于 2021 年 1 月 7 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日进行。我们对研究期间开始和结束治疗的参与者的数据进行了回顾性评估。研究对象是在 26 个月期间接受治疗和退出治疗的 18 岁及以上、被诊断患有药物滥用症的 IOP 小组成员。共有 1502 名参与者(每个地点 181-255 人)的连续样本,其中 644 人被剔除:其中 576 人在研究结束后出院,49 人缺失注册或出院数据,14 人在治疗过程中转院,5 人在研究开始前开始治疗。赫尔默特对比评估了混合组暴露的影响。研究结果共纳入 858 人。数据并非来自病历,且已去除特定人口统计学特征;然而,2020-2022 年的总体 IOP 样本(样本来源)中,29.8% 为女性,64.1% 为 18-40 岁。就已完成的治疗而言,混合组相对于纯虚拟组的单变量几率比为 1.88(95% CI:1.50-2.41,p <0.001)。不同眼压观测点之间没有明显差异。结论这些结果描述了一种新颖的混合小组虚拟治疗 SUD 的方法,其结果数据在以前的文献中没有记载。虽然虚拟治疗可以增加获得治疗的机会,但这些结果表明,包括面对面治疗在内的选择也会带来益处。还需要进一步的研究,以确定面对面治疗如何改变动态,以及是否可以在纯虚拟模式中复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model
Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181–255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020–2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18–40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50–2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信