{"title":"局部硅凝胶和聚氨酯敷料对疤痕演变的影响。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel<span><span> (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking </span>wound care.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel<span> had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a topical silicone gel and a polyurethane dressing on the evolution of scars\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel<span><span> (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking </span>wound care.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel<span> had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 250-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147924000365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147924000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 评估外用硅凝胶(BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices)和聚氨酯敷料(BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices)对曾在急诊科就诊并寻求伤口护理的患者疤痕演变的有效性和安全性。方法 在多诺斯蒂亚大学医院急诊科(招募)和 Biodonostia 健康研究所(干预)进行了一项单中心、分层观察、开放标签研究。未暴露部位的疤痕使用敷料,暴露部位的疤痕使用凝胶或敷料。研究人员在第 1 天、第 4 周、第 8 周和第 12 周对干预措施进行评估。研究人员使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)和照片评估来确定疤痕的演变情况,并通过向患者发放调查问卷的方式评估他们对疤痕的主观感受。治疗 90 天后,该值降至 0.86 ± 1.17。使用聚氨酯敷料治疗的患者初始 VSS 平均得分为 5.8 ± 2.29。治疗 90 天后,平均得分降至 0.33 ± 0.66。结论从疤痕演变的客观和主观角度来看,两种治疗方法似乎都是安全有效的。
Effect of a topical silicone gel and a polyurethane dressing on the evolution of scars
Objective
To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking wound care.
Method
A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.
Results
Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.
Conclusions
Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.