入门第一部分--准备实验室质量改进项目。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Mary Kathryn Bohn , Roy Augustin , Lucas Chartier , Luke Devine , Samik Doshi , Leanne Ginty , Elliot Lass , Felix Leung , William Mundle , Graeme Nimmo , Alyson Sandy , Kelly Shillington , Amanda Simon , Amanda Steiman , Ahmed Taher , Cindy Tang Friesner , Cristina Zanchetta , Jennifer Taher
{"title":"入门第一部分--准备实验室质量改进项目。","authors":"Mary Kathryn Bohn ,&nbsp;Roy Augustin ,&nbsp;Lucas Chartier ,&nbsp;Luke Devine ,&nbsp;Samik Doshi ,&nbsp;Leanne Ginty ,&nbsp;Elliot Lass ,&nbsp;Felix Leung ,&nbsp;William Mundle ,&nbsp;Graeme Nimmo ,&nbsp;Alyson Sandy ,&nbsp;Kelly Shillington ,&nbsp;Amanda Simon ,&nbsp;Amanda Steiman ,&nbsp;Ahmed Taher ,&nbsp;Cindy Tang Friesner ,&nbsp;Cristina Zanchetta ,&nbsp;Jennifer Taher","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quality in laboratory medicine encompasses multiple components related to total quality management, including quality control (QC), quality assurance (QA), quality indicators, and quality improvement (QI). Together, they contribute to minimizing errors (pre-analytical, analytical, or post-analytical) in clinical service delivery and improving process appropriateness and efficiency. In contrast to static quality benchmarks (QC, QA, quality indicators), the QI paradigm is a continuous approach to systemic process improvement for optimizing patient safety, timeliness, effectiveness, and efficiency. Healthcare institutions have placed emphasis on applying the QI framework to identify and improve healthcare delivery. Despite QI’s increasing importance, there is a lack of guidance on preparing, executing, and sustaining QI initiatives in the field of laboratory medicine. This has presented a significant barrier for clinical laboratorians to participate in and lead QI initiatives. This three-part primer series will bridge this knowledge gap by providing a guide for clinical laboratories to implement a QI project that is<!--> <!-->successful and sustainable. In the first article, we introduce the steps needed to prepare a QI project with focus on relevant methodology and tools related to problem identification, stakeholder engagement, root cause analysis (<em>e.g.</em>, fishbone diagrams, Pareto charts and process mapping), and SMART aim establishment. Throughout, we describe a clinical vignette of a real QI project completed at our institution focused on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) utilization. This primer series is the first of its kind in laboratory medicine and will serve as a useful resource for future engagement of clinical laboratory leaders in QI initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 110764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000584/pdfft?md5=66156f0419453caa9b111944d4512899&pid=1-s2.0-S0009912024000584-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primer Part 1 − Preparing a laboratory quality improvement project\",\"authors\":\"Mary Kathryn Bohn ,&nbsp;Roy Augustin ,&nbsp;Lucas Chartier ,&nbsp;Luke Devine ,&nbsp;Samik Doshi ,&nbsp;Leanne Ginty ,&nbsp;Elliot Lass ,&nbsp;Felix Leung ,&nbsp;William Mundle ,&nbsp;Graeme Nimmo ,&nbsp;Alyson Sandy ,&nbsp;Kelly Shillington ,&nbsp;Amanda Simon ,&nbsp;Amanda Steiman ,&nbsp;Ahmed Taher ,&nbsp;Cindy Tang Friesner ,&nbsp;Cristina Zanchetta ,&nbsp;Jennifer Taher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quality in laboratory medicine encompasses multiple components related to total quality management, including quality control (QC), quality assurance (QA), quality indicators, and quality improvement (QI). Together, they contribute to minimizing errors (pre-analytical, analytical, or post-analytical) in clinical service delivery and improving process appropriateness and efficiency. In contrast to static quality benchmarks (QC, QA, quality indicators), the QI paradigm is a continuous approach to systemic process improvement for optimizing patient safety, timeliness, effectiveness, and efficiency. Healthcare institutions have placed emphasis on applying the QI framework to identify and improve healthcare delivery. Despite QI’s increasing importance, there is a lack of guidance on preparing, executing, and sustaining QI initiatives in the field of laboratory medicine. This has presented a significant barrier for clinical laboratorians to participate in and lead QI initiatives. This three-part primer series will bridge this knowledge gap by providing a guide for clinical laboratories to implement a QI project that is<!--> <!-->successful and sustainable. In the first article, we introduce the steps needed to prepare a QI project with focus on relevant methodology and tools related to problem identification, stakeholder engagement, root cause analysis (<em>e.g.</em>, fishbone diagrams, Pareto charts and process mapping), and SMART aim establishment. Throughout, we describe a clinical vignette of a real QI project completed at our institution focused on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) utilization. This primer series is the first of its kind in laboratory medicine and will serve as a useful resource for future engagement of clinical laboratory leaders in QI initiatives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000584/pdfft?md5=66156f0419453caa9b111944d4512899&pid=1-s2.0-S0009912024000584-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000584\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

检验医学质量包含与全面质量管理相关的多个组成部分,包括质量控制(QC)、质量保证(QA)、质量指标和质量改进(QI)。它们共同致力于最大限度地减少临床服务中的错误(分析前、分析中或分析后),并提高流程的适当性和效率。与静态的质量基准(QC、QA、质量指标)不同,QI 范式是一种持续的系统流程改进方法,旨在优化患者安全、及时性、有效性和效率。医疗保健机构一直重视应用 QI 框架来确定和改进医疗保健服务。尽管 QI 的重要性与日俱增,但在检验医学领域却缺乏有关准备、执行和持续实施 QI 计划的指导。这严重阻碍了临床检验医师参与和领导 QI 计划。本系列入门读物由三部分组成,将为临床实验室实施成功且可持续的质量改进项目提供指导,从而弥补这一知识空白。在第一篇文章中,我们介绍了准备 QI 项目所需的步骤,重点是与问题识别、利益相关者参与、根本原因分析(如鱼骨图、帕累托图和流程图)以及 SMART 目标确立相关的方法和工具。在整个过程中,我们描述了本机构完成的一个真实 QI 项目的临床小故事,该项目侧重于血清蛋白电泳 (SPEP) 的使用。这套入门系列丛书在检验医学领域尚属首创,将成为临床实验室领导者未来参与质量改进项目的有用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primer Part 1 − Preparing a laboratory quality improvement project

Quality in laboratory medicine encompasses multiple components related to total quality management, including quality control (QC), quality assurance (QA), quality indicators, and quality improvement (QI). Together, they contribute to minimizing errors (pre-analytical, analytical, or post-analytical) in clinical service delivery and improving process appropriateness and efficiency. In contrast to static quality benchmarks (QC, QA, quality indicators), the QI paradigm is a continuous approach to systemic process improvement for optimizing patient safety, timeliness, effectiveness, and efficiency. Healthcare institutions have placed emphasis on applying the QI framework to identify and improve healthcare delivery. Despite QI’s increasing importance, there is a lack of guidance on preparing, executing, and sustaining QI initiatives in the field of laboratory medicine. This has presented a significant barrier for clinical laboratorians to participate in and lead QI initiatives. This three-part primer series will bridge this knowledge gap by providing a guide for clinical laboratories to implement a QI project that is successful and sustainable. In the first article, we introduce the steps needed to prepare a QI project with focus on relevant methodology and tools related to problem identification, stakeholder engagement, root cause analysis (e.g., fishbone diagrams, Pareto charts and process mapping), and SMART aim establishment. Throughout, we describe a clinical vignette of a real QI project completed at our institution focused on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) utilization. This primer series is the first of its kind in laboratory medicine and will serve as a useful resource for future engagement of clinical laboratory leaders in QI initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信