免疫疗法后的挽救性肺切除术既可行又安全

{"title":"免疫疗法后的挽救性肺切除术既可行又安全","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy and modern chemoradiation regimens show improved progression-free and overall survival. However, patients with limited oligo-progression represent a potential population in which local therapy such as surgery may have a potential role as salvage treatment. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage lung resection after immunotherapy in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed and treated for non–small cell lung cancer stage I to IV, from 2013 to 2020. Patients who underwent surgery as salvage after immunotherapy were defined as undergoing surgery &gt;5 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. As a sensitivity analysis, patients who underwent surgery as salvage after chemoradiation were also analyzed in a similar fashion. Surgical outcomes such as type of surgery, complete resection (R0) rates, and complete pathologic response rates were determined for feasibility. Length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, and 30-day mortality rates were determined and overall survivals were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate for safety.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 934,093 patients diagnosed with non–small cell lung cancer stage I to IV from 2013 to 2020, 164 patients received immunotherapy and after 5 months underwent surgery. Lobectomy was the most commonly performed operation (74%) and pneumonectomy was required in 9% (n = 15). R0 resection was achieved in 89% (n = 146) and of these patients, 23% (n = 37) had complete pathologic response. Median length of stay was 4 days, 30-day readmission was 5%, and 30-day mortality was 0.6%. In our sensitivity analysis of chemoradiation patients (n = 445), the above data were similar to previously reported cohort studies of patients undergoing chemoradiation and subsequently salvage surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lung resection after immunotherapy appears to be a feasible salvage treatment option, with lobectomy being most common and with high R0 resection rates. Low patient morbidity and mortality rates also suggest the safety of this approach. Salvage surgery may be considered in patients who have oligo-progression after immunotherapy within the context of a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment plan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001128/pdfft?md5=ffaf91ee55dcf62366d75060b2116206&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624001128-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.03.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy and modern chemoradiation regimens show improved progression-free and overall survival. However, patients with limited oligo-progression represent a potential population in which local therapy such as surgery may have a potential role as salvage treatment. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage lung resection after immunotherapy in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed and treated for non–small cell lung cancer stage I to IV, from 2013 to 2020. Patients who underwent surgery as salvage after immunotherapy were defined as undergoing surgery &gt;5 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. As a sensitivity analysis, patients who underwent surgery as salvage after chemoradiation were also analyzed in a similar fashion. Surgical outcomes such as type of surgery, complete resection (R0) rates, and complete pathologic response rates were determined for feasibility. Length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, and 30-day mortality rates were determined and overall survivals were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate for safety.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 934,093 patients diagnosed with non–small cell lung cancer stage I to IV from 2013 to 2020, 164 patients received immunotherapy and after 5 months underwent surgery. Lobectomy was the most commonly performed operation (74%) and pneumonectomy was required in 9% (n = 15). R0 resection was achieved in 89% (n = 146) and of these patients, 23% (n = 37) had complete pathologic response. Median length of stay was 4 days, 30-day readmission was 5%, and 30-day mortality was 0.6%. In our sensitivity analysis of chemoradiation patients (n = 445), the above data were similar to previously reported cohort studies of patients undergoing chemoradiation and subsequently salvage surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lung resection after immunotherapy appears to be a feasible salvage treatment option, with lobectomy being most common and with high R0 resection rates. Low patient morbidity and mortality rates also suggest the safety of this approach. Salvage surgery may be considered in patients who have oligo-progression after immunotherapy within the context of a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment plan.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001128/pdfft?md5=ffaf91ee55dcf62366d75060b2116206&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624001128-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标接受免疫疗法和现代化疗方案治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的无进展生存期和总生存期均有所改善。然而,局限性少见进展的患者是局部治疗(如手术)可能作为挽救性治疗发挥作用的潜在人群。我们的研究目的是评估非小细胞肺癌患者接受免疫疗法后进行挽救性肺切除术的可行性和安全性。方法查询美国国家癌症数据库,了解 2013 年至 2020 年期间诊断和治疗的 I 至 IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者。免疫治疗后接受手术作为挽救治疗的患者被定义为在开始免疫治疗5个月后接受手术>。作为一项敏感性分析,化疗后作为挽救手段接受手术的患者也以类似方式进行了分析。手术类型、完全切除率(R0)和完全病理反应率等手术结果都是根据可行性确定的。研究还确定了住院时间、30 天再入院率和 30 天死亡率,并采用卡普兰-梅耶尔分析法估算了总生存率,以评估其安全性。肺叶切除术是最常见的手术(74%),9%的患者需要进行肺切除术(n = 15)。89%的患者(146人)实现了R0切除,其中23%的患者(37人)获得了完全病理反应。中位住院时间为 4 天,30 天再入院率为 5%,30 天死亡率为 0.6%。在我们对化疗患者(n = 445)进行的敏感性分析中,上述数据与之前报道的接受化疗并随后接受挽救手术的患者队列研究相似。患者的低发病率和低死亡率也表明了这种方法的安全性。在多学科综合治疗计划的背景下,免疫治疗后出现寡进展的患者可考虑进行挽救性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe

Objectives

Patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy and modern chemoradiation regimens show improved progression-free and overall survival. However, patients with limited oligo-progression represent a potential population in which local therapy such as surgery may have a potential role as salvage treatment. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage lung resection after immunotherapy in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed and treated for non–small cell lung cancer stage I to IV, from 2013 to 2020. Patients who underwent surgery as salvage after immunotherapy were defined as undergoing surgery >5 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. As a sensitivity analysis, patients who underwent surgery as salvage after chemoradiation were also analyzed in a similar fashion. Surgical outcomes such as type of surgery, complete resection (R0) rates, and complete pathologic response rates were determined for feasibility. Length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, and 30-day mortality rates were determined and overall survivals were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate for safety.

Results

Of the 934,093 patients diagnosed with non–small cell lung cancer stage I to IV from 2013 to 2020, 164 patients received immunotherapy and after 5 months underwent surgery. Lobectomy was the most commonly performed operation (74%) and pneumonectomy was required in 9% (n = 15). R0 resection was achieved in 89% (n = 146) and of these patients, 23% (n = 37) had complete pathologic response. Median length of stay was 4 days, 30-day readmission was 5%, and 30-day mortality was 0.6%. In our sensitivity analysis of chemoradiation patients (n = 445), the above data were similar to previously reported cohort studies of patients undergoing chemoradiation and subsequently salvage surgery.

Conclusions

Lung resection after immunotherapy appears to be a feasible salvage treatment option, with lobectomy being most common and with high R0 resection rates. Low patient morbidity and mortality rates also suggest the safety of this approach. Salvage surgery may be considered in patients who have oligo-progression after immunotherapy within the context of a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment plan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信