媒介即信使 社交媒体服务与邻里社交互动关系的定量研究

Q2 Social Sciences
Jan Üblacker, Simon Liebig, Hawzheen Hamad
{"title":"媒介即信使 社交媒体服务与邻里社交互动关系的定量研究","authors":"Jan Üblacker, Simon Liebig, Hawzheen Hamad","doi":"10.2148/benv.50.1.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet-based social networking services (ISNS) like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and others have revolutionized the way people connect, enabling interactions across great distances. This has sparked a debate about the impact of ISNS use on face-to-face contact, particularly within\n neighbourhoods. Some argue that ISNS diminish the significance of local physical place and hinder meaningful interactions, especially among neighbours. Conversely, others view ISNS as tools that foster new forms of connectedness and enhance relationships within neighbourhoods by creating opportunities\n to engage with existing peers. However, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding the varying effects of ISNS on offline social interaction within neighbourhoods. Do different ISNS, including messenger services, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and neighbourhood-specific social networks\n (e.g.nebenan.de), 1 have distinct effects on offline social interaction within neighbourhoods? Are there differences in usage between native residents and migrants? We analyse data from a 2022 postal survey conducted in two German cities (Essen and Cologne), involving 2, 676 residents in 166\n neighbourhoods. The results from our multiple linear regression model show that the impact of different ISNS on social interactions varies. Messenger services and neighbourhood-specific social networks have a positive impact on social interactions within the neighbourhood. However, popular\n social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter do not significantly affect social interactions within the neighbourhood. Additionally, individuals from the native population do have more social interaction with their neighbours compared to those with a migration background.","PeriodicalId":53715,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment","volume":"83 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Medium is the Messenger A Quantitative Study on the Relation between Social Media Services and Neighbourhood Social Interactions\",\"authors\":\"Jan Üblacker, Simon Liebig, Hawzheen Hamad\",\"doi\":\"10.2148/benv.50.1.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internet-based social networking services (ISNS) like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and others have revolutionized the way people connect, enabling interactions across great distances. This has sparked a debate about the impact of ISNS use on face-to-face contact, particularly within\\n neighbourhoods. Some argue that ISNS diminish the significance of local physical place and hinder meaningful interactions, especially among neighbours. Conversely, others view ISNS as tools that foster new forms of connectedness and enhance relationships within neighbourhoods by creating opportunities\\n to engage with existing peers. However, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding the varying effects of ISNS on offline social interaction within neighbourhoods. Do different ISNS, including messenger services, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and neighbourhood-specific social networks\\n (e.g.nebenan.de), 1 have distinct effects on offline social interaction within neighbourhoods? Are there differences in usage between native residents and migrants? We analyse data from a 2022 postal survey conducted in two German cities (Essen and Cologne), involving 2, 676 residents in 166\\n neighbourhoods. The results from our multiple linear regression model show that the impact of different ISNS on social interactions varies. Messenger services and neighbourhood-specific social networks have a positive impact on social interactions within the neighbourhood. However, popular\\n social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter do not significantly affect social interactions within the neighbourhood. Additionally, individuals from the native population do have more social interaction with their neighbours compared to those with a migration background.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.50.1.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.50.1.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于互联网的社交网络服务(ISNS),如 Facebook、Instagram、Twitter 等,彻底改变了人们的联系方式,实现了远距离互动。这引发了一场关于 ISNS 的使用对面对面接触的影响的辩论,尤其是在邻里之间。一些人认为,ISNS 削弱了当地物理场所的重要性,阻碍了有意义的互动,尤其是邻居之间的互动。相反,另一些人则认为 ISNS 是促进新形式联系的工具,通过创造与现有同伴接触的机会来加强邻里关系。然而,关于 ISNS 对邻里间离线社交互动的不同影响,还存在着巨大的知识空白。不同的 ISNS,包括信使服务、Facebook、Instagram、Twitter 和邻里特定社交网络(如 nebenan.de),1 对邻里内的线下社交互动是否有不同的影响?本地居民和移民在使用上是否存在差异?我们分析了 2022 年在德国两个城市(埃森和科隆)进行的邮寄调查数据,涉及 166 个社区的 2,676 名居民。多元线性回归模型的结果表明,不同的 ISNS 对社交互动的影响各不相同。信使服务和特定街区的社交网络对街区内的社交互动有积极影响。然而,Facebook、Instagram 和 Twitter 等流行社交媒体平台对邻里间的社交互动并无显著影响。此外,与有移民背景的人相比,本地人确实与邻居有更多的社交互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Medium is the Messenger A Quantitative Study on the Relation between Social Media Services and Neighbourhood Social Interactions
Internet-based social networking services (ISNS) like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and others have revolutionized the way people connect, enabling interactions across great distances. This has sparked a debate about the impact of ISNS use on face-to-face contact, particularly within neighbourhoods. Some argue that ISNS diminish the significance of local physical place and hinder meaningful interactions, especially among neighbours. Conversely, others view ISNS as tools that foster new forms of connectedness and enhance relationships within neighbourhoods by creating opportunities to engage with existing peers. However, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding the varying effects of ISNS on offline social interaction within neighbourhoods. Do different ISNS, including messenger services, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and neighbourhood-specific social networks (e.g.nebenan.de), 1 have distinct effects on offline social interaction within neighbourhoods? Are there differences in usage between native residents and migrants? We analyse data from a 2022 postal survey conducted in two German cities (Essen and Cologne), involving 2, 676 residents in 166 neighbourhoods. The results from our multiple linear regression model show that the impact of different ISNS on social interactions varies. Messenger services and neighbourhood-specific social networks have a positive impact on social interactions within the neighbourhood. However, popular social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter do not significantly affect social interactions within the neighbourhood. Additionally, individuals from the native population do have more social interaction with their neighbours compared to those with a migration background.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Built Environment
Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信