S. Schoisswohl, Carolina Kanig, M. Osnabruegge, D. Agboada, B. Langguth, Roman Rethwilm, T. Hebel, M. Abdelnaim, Wolfgang Mack, Wolfgang Seiberl, Manuel Kuder, M. Schecklmann
{"title":"监测健康运动皮层 1 赫兹经颅磁刺激期间经颅磁刺激诱发的脑电图和肌电图活动变化","authors":"S. Schoisswohl, Carolina Kanig, M. Osnabruegge, D. Agboada, B. Langguth, Roman Rethwilm, T. Hebel, M. Abdelnaim, Wolfgang Mack, Wolfgang Seiberl, Manuel Kuder, M. Schecklmann","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0309-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique capable of inducing neuroplasticity as measured by changes in peripheral muscle electromyography (EMG) or electroencephalography (EEG) from pre-to-post stimulation. However, temporal courses of neuromodulation during ongoing rTMS are unclear. Monitoring cortical dynamics via TMS-evoked responses using EMG (motor-evoked potentials; MEPs) and EEG (transcranial-evoked potentials; TEPs) during rTMS might provide further essential insights into its mode of action – temporal course of potential modulations. The objective of this study was to first evaluate the validity of online rTMS-EEG and rTMS-EMG analyses, and second to scrutinize the temporal changes of TEPs and MEPs during rTMS. As rTMS is subject to high inter-individual effect variability, we aimed for single-subject analyses of EEG changes during rTMS. Ten healthy human participants were stimulated with 1,000 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex, while EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. Validity of MEPs and TEPs measured during rTMS was assessed in sensor and source space. Electrophysiological changes during rTMS were evaluated with model fitting approaches on a group- and single-subject level. TEPs and MEPs appearance during rTMS was consistent with past findings of single pulse experiments. Heterogeneous temporal progressions, fluctuations or saturation effects of brain activity were observed during rTMS depending on the TEP component. Overall, global brain activity increased over the course of stimulation. Single-subject analysis revealed inter-individual temporal courses of global brain activity. The present findings are in favor of dose-response considerations and attempts in personalization of rTMS protocols.","PeriodicalId":506486,"journal":{"name":"eneuro","volume":"72 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Changes in TMS-Evoked EEG and EMG Activity During 1 Hz rTMS of the Healthy Motor Cortex\",\"authors\":\"S. Schoisswohl, Carolina Kanig, M. Osnabruegge, D. Agboada, B. Langguth, Roman Rethwilm, T. Hebel, M. Abdelnaim, Wolfgang Mack, Wolfgang Seiberl, Manuel Kuder, M. Schecklmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0309-23.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique capable of inducing neuroplasticity as measured by changes in peripheral muscle electromyography (EMG) or electroencephalography (EEG) from pre-to-post stimulation. However, temporal courses of neuromodulation during ongoing rTMS are unclear. Monitoring cortical dynamics via TMS-evoked responses using EMG (motor-evoked potentials; MEPs) and EEG (transcranial-evoked potentials; TEPs) during rTMS might provide further essential insights into its mode of action – temporal course of potential modulations. The objective of this study was to first evaluate the validity of online rTMS-EEG and rTMS-EMG analyses, and second to scrutinize the temporal changes of TEPs and MEPs during rTMS. As rTMS is subject to high inter-individual effect variability, we aimed for single-subject analyses of EEG changes during rTMS. Ten healthy human participants were stimulated with 1,000 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex, while EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. Validity of MEPs and TEPs measured during rTMS was assessed in sensor and source space. Electrophysiological changes during rTMS were evaluated with model fitting approaches on a group- and single-subject level. TEPs and MEPs appearance during rTMS was consistent with past findings of single pulse experiments. Heterogeneous temporal progressions, fluctuations or saturation effects of brain activity were observed during rTMS depending on the TEP component. Overall, global brain activity increased over the course of stimulation. Single-subject analysis revealed inter-individual temporal courses of global brain activity. The present findings are in favor of dose-response considerations and attempts in personalization of rTMS protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eneuro\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eneuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0309-23.2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eneuro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0309-23.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,能够诱导神经可塑性,其测量方法是外周肌肉肌电图(EMG)或脑电图(EEG)从刺激前到刺激后的变化。然而,持续经颅磁刺激过程中神经调节的时间进程尚不清楚。在经颅磁刺激过程中,使用肌电图(运动诱发电位;MEPs)和脑电图(经颅诱发电位;TEPs)通过经颅磁刺激诱发的反应监测皮层动态,可能会为了解其作用模式--电位调节的时间过程提供更多重要信息。本研究的目的首先是评估经颅磁刺激-EEG 和经颅磁刺激-EMG 在线分析的有效性,其次是仔细研究经颅磁刺激过程中 TEP 和 MEP 的时间变化。由于经颅磁刺激的个体间效应变异性很大,我们的目标是对经颅磁刺激过程中的脑电图变化进行单受试者分析。我们对 10 名健康人的运动皮层进行了 1000 次脉冲频率为 1 Hz 的经颅磁刺激,同时连续记录脑电图和肌电图。评估了经颅磁刺激期间测量的 MEP 和 TEP 在传感器和信号源空间的有效性。经颅磁刺激过程中的电生理变化通过模型拟合方法在群体和单个受试者水平上进行评估。经颅磁刺激过程中出现的 TEPs 和 MEPs 与过去单脉冲实验的结果一致。根据 TEP 成分的不同,经颅磁刺激过程中观察到了大脑活动的异质性时间进展、波动或饱和效应。总体而言,在刺激过程中,大脑的整体活动有所增加。单个受试者分析显示了全局脑活动的个体间时间进程。目前的研究结果有利于剂量反应的考虑和经颅磁刺激方案个性化的尝试。
Monitoring Changes in TMS-Evoked EEG and EMG Activity During 1 Hz rTMS of the Healthy Motor Cortex
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique capable of inducing neuroplasticity as measured by changes in peripheral muscle electromyography (EMG) or electroencephalography (EEG) from pre-to-post stimulation. However, temporal courses of neuromodulation during ongoing rTMS are unclear. Monitoring cortical dynamics via TMS-evoked responses using EMG (motor-evoked potentials; MEPs) and EEG (transcranial-evoked potentials; TEPs) during rTMS might provide further essential insights into its mode of action – temporal course of potential modulations. The objective of this study was to first evaluate the validity of online rTMS-EEG and rTMS-EMG analyses, and second to scrutinize the temporal changes of TEPs and MEPs during rTMS. As rTMS is subject to high inter-individual effect variability, we aimed for single-subject analyses of EEG changes during rTMS. Ten healthy human participants were stimulated with 1,000 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex, while EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. Validity of MEPs and TEPs measured during rTMS was assessed in sensor and source space. Electrophysiological changes during rTMS were evaluated with model fitting approaches on a group- and single-subject level. TEPs and MEPs appearance during rTMS was consistent with past findings of single pulse experiments. Heterogeneous temporal progressions, fluctuations or saturation effects of brain activity were observed during rTMS depending on the TEP component. Overall, global brain activity increased over the course of stimulation. Single-subject analysis revealed inter-individual temporal courses of global brain activity. The present findings are in favor of dose-response considerations and attempts in personalization of rTMS protocols.