关于碳离子放疗对少转移、持续性或复发性(MPR)卵巢癌/输卵管癌作用的首项真实世界研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Amelia Barcellini , Kazutoshi Murata , Giulia Fontana , Alessandro Vai , Chiara Cassani , Fabio Landoni , Laura Deborah Locati , Francesco Raspagliesi , Simona Secondino , Mattia Pecorilla , Shigeru Yamada , Noriyuki Okonogi , Ester Orlandi
{"title":"关于碳离子放疗对少转移、持续性或复发性(MPR)卵巢癌/输卵管癌作用的首项真实世界研究","authors":"Amelia Barcellini ,&nbsp;Kazutoshi Murata ,&nbsp;Giulia Fontana ,&nbsp;Alessandro Vai ,&nbsp;Chiara Cassani ,&nbsp;Fabio Landoni ,&nbsp;Laura Deborah Locati ,&nbsp;Francesco Raspagliesi ,&nbsp;Simona Secondino ,&nbsp;Mattia Pecorilla ,&nbsp;Shigeru Yamada ,&nbsp;Noriyuki Okonogi ,&nbsp;Ester Orlandi","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the multidisciplinary management of oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian cancer, radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a more and more worthwhile treatment to potentially improve the chronicity of the disease. Particle beam RT has proved to be effective in several gynecological malignancies, but so far no data are available for ovarian cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>This is a real-world, retrospective, bi-institutional, single-arm study aimed to assess the effectiveness and the safety of carbon ion RT (CIRT) in this setting. The co-first endpoints are 1-year and 2-year actuarial local control (LC) rates and the objective response rate (ORR) defined on a “per lesion” basis. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. Actuarial outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method while potential predictors were explored using the Log-rank test. Bi-variable logistic regression was employed in the analysis of factors predicting the complete response on a per-lesion basis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>26 patients accounting for a total of 36 lesions underwent CIRT with a total median dose of 52.8 Gy[RBE] (range: 39–64 Gy[RBE]). Five patients received CIRT for re-irradiation. No concomitant systemic therapies were administered during CIRT. Within 12 months after the treatment, 17 lesions (47 %) achieved complete response while 18 (50 %) obtained a partial response with an ORR of 97 %. The achievement of a complete response is related to the dose per fraction (&gt;4.2 Gy[RBE], p = 0.04) and total dose (&gt;52,8 Gy[RBE], p = 0.05). The 1-year LC was 92 % and the 2-year LC was 83 %, according to the achievement of a CR (p = 0.007) and GTV ≤ 14 cm3 (p = 0.024). No grade &gt; 3 toxicities were recorded both in naïve and re-irradiated patients. PARP-i and anti-VEGF seemed not to exacerbate the risk of severe toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CIRT was effective and safe in MPR ovarian cancers, even in the case of re-irradiation. Largest cohort studies and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000582/pdfft?md5=a0ca991d0e46b65bc37c94bfaedc8e2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000582-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first real-world study on the role of carbon ion radiotherapy for oligo-metastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian/fallopian tube cancer\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Barcellini ,&nbsp;Kazutoshi Murata ,&nbsp;Giulia Fontana ,&nbsp;Alessandro Vai ,&nbsp;Chiara Cassani ,&nbsp;Fabio Landoni ,&nbsp;Laura Deborah Locati ,&nbsp;Francesco Raspagliesi ,&nbsp;Simona Secondino ,&nbsp;Mattia Pecorilla ,&nbsp;Shigeru Yamada ,&nbsp;Noriyuki Okonogi ,&nbsp;Ester Orlandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the multidisciplinary management of oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian cancer, radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a more and more worthwhile treatment to potentially improve the chronicity of the disease. Particle beam RT has proved to be effective in several gynecological malignancies, but so far no data are available for ovarian cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>This is a real-world, retrospective, bi-institutional, single-arm study aimed to assess the effectiveness and the safety of carbon ion RT (CIRT) in this setting. The co-first endpoints are 1-year and 2-year actuarial local control (LC) rates and the objective response rate (ORR) defined on a “per lesion” basis. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. Actuarial outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method while potential predictors were explored using the Log-rank test. Bi-variable logistic regression was employed in the analysis of factors predicting the complete response on a per-lesion basis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>26 patients accounting for a total of 36 lesions underwent CIRT with a total median dose of 52.8 Gy[RBE] (range: 39–64 Gy[RBE]). Five patients received CIRT for re-irradiation. No concomitant systemic therapies were administered during CIRT. Within 12 months after the treatment, 17 lesions (47 %) achieved complete response while 18 (50 %) obtained a partial response with an ORR of 97 %. The achievement of a complete response is related to the dose per fraction (&gt;4.2 Gy[RBE], p = 0.04) and total dose (&gt;52,8 Gy[RBE], p = 0.05). The 1-year LC was 92 % and the 2-year LC was 83 %, according to the achievement of a CR (p = 0.007) and GTV ≤ 14 cm3 (p = 0.024). No grade &gt; 3 toxicities were recorded both in naïve and re-irradiated patients. PARP-i and anti-VEGF seemed not to exacerbate the risk of severe toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CIRT was effective and safe in MPR ovarian cancers, even in the case of re-irradiation. Largest cohort studies and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000582/pdfft?md5=a0ca991d0e46b65bc37c94bfaedc8e2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000582-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言在对少转移、持续性或复发性(MPR)卵巢癌的多学科治疗中,放射治疗(RT)正成为一种越来越有价值的治疗方法,有可能改善疾病的慢性化。材料与方法 这是一项真实世界、回顾性、双机构、单臂研究,旨在评估碳离子 RT(CIRT)在这种情况下的有效性和安全性。共同第一终点是1年和2年的精算局部控制率(LC)以及按 "每个病灶 "定义的客观反应率(ORR)。次要终点是毒性。精算结果采用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行评估,而潜在的预测因素则采用 Log-rank 检验法进行探讨。结果26名患者共36个病灶接受了CIRT治疗,总中位剂量为52.8 Gy[RBE](范围:39-64 Gy[RBE])。五名患者接受了 CIRT 再照射。CIRT 期间未同时进行全身治疗。治疗后 12 个月内,17 个病灶(47%)获得完全应答,18 个病灶(50%)获得部分应答,ORR 为 97%。完全反应的获得与每部分剂量(4.2 Gy[RBE],p = 0.04)和总剂量(52.8 Gy[RBE],p = 0.05)有关。根据CR(p = 0.007)和GTV ≤ 14 cm3(p = 0.024),1年生存率为92%,2年生存率为83%。新患者和再放疗患者均未出现 3 级毒性反应。PARP-i和抗血管内皮生长因子似乎不会增加严重毒性反应的风险。结论CIRT对MPR卵巢癌有效且安全,即使在再次照射的情况下也是如此。结论CIRT对MPR卵巢癌有效且安全,即使在再次放疗的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The first real-world study on the role of carbon ion radiotherapy for oligo-metastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian/fallopian tube cancer

Introduction

In the multidisciplinary management of oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian cancer, radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a more and more worthwhile treatment to potentially improve the chronicity of the disease. Particle beam RT has proved to be effective in several gynecological malignancies, but so far no data are available for ovarian cancer.

Material and Methods

This is a real-world, retrospective, bi-institutional, single-arm study aimed to assess the effectiveness and the safety of carbon ion RT (CIRT) in this setting. The co-first endpoints are 1-year and 2-year actuarial local control (LC) rates and the objective response rate (ORR) defined on a “per lesion” basis. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. Actuarial outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method while potential predictors were explored using the Log-rank test. Bi-variable logistic regression was employed in the analysis of factors predicting the complete response on a per-lesion basis.

Results

26 patients accounting for a total of 36 lesions underwent CIRT with a total median dose of 52.8 Gy[RBE] (range: 39–64 Gy[RBE]). Five patients received CIRT for re-irradiation. No concomitant systemic therapies were administered during CIRT. Within 12 months after the treatment, 17 lesions (47 %) achieved complete response while 18 (50 %) obtained a partial response with an ORR of 97 %. The achievement of a complete response is related to the dose per fraction (>4.2 Gy[RBE], p = 0.04) and total dose (>52,8 Gy[RBE], p = 0.05). The 1-year LC was 92 % and the 2-year LC was 83 %, according to the achievement of a CR (p = 0.007) and GTV ≤ 14 cm3 (p = 0.024). No grade > 3 toxicities were recorded both in naïve and re-irradiated patients. PARP-i and anti-VEGF seemed not to exacerbate the risk of severe toxicities.

Conclusions

CIRT was effective and safe in MPR ovarian cancers, even in the case of re-irradiation. Largest cohort studies and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信