坦桑尼亚一家国立医院在门静脉高压症治疗中对非选择性β受体阻滞剂滴定的临床审计

Clinical audit Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.2147/ca.s412250
Swaleh Pazi, Ally Mwanga, T. Lyuu, M. Ng'wanasayi, John Rwegasha, E. Komba, Igembe Nkandala
{"title":"坦桑尼亚一家国立医院在门静脉高压症治疗中对非选择性β受体阻滞剂滴定的临床审计","authors":"Swaleh Pazi, Ally Mwanga, T. Lyuu, M. Ng'wanasayi, John Rwegasha, E. Komba, Igembe Nkandala","doi":"10.2147/ca.s412250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Portal hypertension – a major complication of chronic liver disease – is associated with multiple complications that include ascites, varices, and hepatic encephalopathy; these complications can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Randomized control trials have demonstrated the efficacy of nonselective beta blockers (NSBB) for preventing primary and secondary gastro-esophageal variceal bleeding. These drugs should be titrated to target the resting heart rate of 55–60 beats per minute and the systolic blood pressure should not decrease <90 mm Hg. The objective of this study was to perform an audit of the titration of nonselective beta blockers in patients with portal hypertension at the national referral hospital. Methods: The audit involved all adults aged 18 years and above with portal hypertension and evidence of esophageal varices who were regularly attending gastroenterology and hepatology clinics of Muhimbili National Hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. The patients’ clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the hospital management. Results: Over the audit period, a total of 151 patients with esophageal varices who attended gastroenterology and hepatology clinics were included. The mean age of the patients was 42.4 years and males accounted for 61% of the cohort. About 90% (136/151) of patients attended the clinic more than three times; 92% (139/151) had an unchanged dose of NSBB for at least two consecutive visits and 60.2% (91/151) were admitted in subsequent visits due to variceal bleeding. Critically, the records showed that 100% of patients did not have their pulse rate and blood pressure recorded. Conclusion: The audit results indicated a low rate of titration of NSBB and poor recording of pulse pressure and blood pressure. It was recommended that NSBB should be appropriately titrated with corresponding precautions taken and the patients’ systolic blood pressures and pulse rates should be recorded.","PeriodicalId":474892,"journal":{"name":"Clinical audit","volume":"195 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Audit of Non-Selective Beta Blockers Titration in the Management of Portal Hypertension at a National Hospital in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Swaleh Pazi, Ally Mwanga, T. Lyuu, M. Ng'wanasayi, John Rwegasha, E. Komba, Igembe Nkandala\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ca.s412250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Portal hypertension – a major complication of chronic liver disease – is associated with multiple complications that include ascites, varices, and hepatic encephalopathy; these complications can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Randomized control trials have demonstrated the efficacy of nonselective beta blockers (NSBB) for preventing primary and secondary gastro-esophageal variceal bleeding. These drugs should be titrated to target the resting heart rate of 55–60 beats per minute and the systolic blood pressure should not decrease <90 mm Hg. The objective of this study was to perform an audit of the titration of nonselective beta blockers in patients with portal hypertension at the national referral hospital. Methods: The audit involved all adults aged 18 years and above with portal hypertension and evidence of esophageal varices who were regularly attending gastroenterology and hepatology clinics of Muhimbili National Hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. The patients’ clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the hospital management. Results: Over the audit period, a total of 151 patients with esophageal varices who attended gastroenterology and hepatology clinics were included. The mean age of the patients was 42.4 years and males accounted for 61% of the cohort. About 90% (136/151) of patients attended the clinic more than three times; 92% (139/151) had an unchanged dose of NSBB for at least two consecutive visits and 60.2% (91/151) were admitted in subsequent visits due to variceal bleeding. Critically, the records showed that 100% of patients did not have their pulse rate and blood pressure recorded. Conclusion: The audit results indicated a low rate of titration of NSBB and poor recording of pulse pressure and blood pressure. It was recommended that NSBB should be appropriately titrated with corresponding precautions taken and the patients’ systolic blood pressures and pulse rates should be recorded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical audit\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical audit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ca.s412250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical audit","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ca.s412250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:门静脉高压症是慢性肝病的一种主要并发症,与腹水、静脉曲张和肝性脑病等多种并发症有关;这些并发症可导致严重的发病率和死亡率。随机对照试验证明,非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBB)对预防原发性和继发性胃食管静脉曲张出血具有疗效。这些药物的剂量应控制在每分钟 55-60 次的静息心率,收缩压不应低于 90 毫米汞柱。本研究旨在对国家转诊医院门静脉高压症患者的非选择性β受体阻滞剂滴定情况进行审核。方法:本次审计涉及2019年1月至2019年12月期间定期在Muhimbili国立医院胃肠病学和肝病学门诊就诊的所有18岁及以上患有门静脉高压症并有食管静脉曲张证据的成年人。患者的临床数据均从电子病历中提取。研究的开展获得了医院管理层的许可。研究结果在审计期间,共有151名食管静脉曲张患者在胃肠病学和肝病学门诊就诊。患者的平均年龄为 42.4 岁,其中男性占 61%。约 90% 的患者(136/151)就诊三次以上;92% 的患者(139/151)至少连续两次使用 NSBB 的剂量不变;60.2% 的患者(91/151)在随后的就诊中因静脉曲张出血而入院。重要的是,记录显示,100% 的患者没有记录脉搏和血压。结论审计结果表明,NSBB 的滴定率较低,脉搏和血压记录不全。建议应适当滴定 NSBB 并采取相应的预防措施,同时记录患者的收缩压和脉搏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Audit of Non-Selective Beta Blockers Titration in the Management of Portal Hypertension at a National Hospital in Tanzania
Background: Portal hypertension – a major complication of chronic liver disease – is associated with multiple complications that include ascites, varices, and hepatic encephalopathy; these complications can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Randomized control trials have demonstrated the efficacy of nonselective beta blockers (NSBB) for preventing primary and secondary gastro-esophageal variceal bleeding. These drugs should be titrated to target the resting heart rate of 55–60 beats per minute and the systolic blood pressure should not decrease <90 mm Hg. The objective of this study was to perform an audit of the titration of nonselective beta blockers in patients with portal hypertension at the national referral hospital. Methods: The audit involved all adults aged 18 years and above with portal hypertension and evidence of esophageal varices who were regularly attending gastroenterology and hepatology clinics of Muhimbili National Hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. The patients’ clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the hospital management. Results: Over the audit period, a total of 151 patients with esophageal varices who attended gastroenterology and hepatology clinics were included. The mean age of the patients was 42.4 years and males accounted for 61% of the cohort. About 90% (136/151) of patients attended the clinic more than three times; 92% (139/151) had an unchanged dose of NSBB for at least two consecutive visits and 60.2% (91/151) were admitted in subsequent visits due to variceal bleeding. Critically, the records showed that 100% of patients did not have their pulse rate and blood pressure recorded. Conclusion: The audit results indicated a low rate of titration of NSBB and poor recording of pulse pressure and blood pressure. It was recommended that NSBB should be appropriately titrated with corresponding precautions taken and the patients’ systolic blood pressures and pulse rates should be recorded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信