M. Markman, E. Saruco, S. Al-Bas, B. A. Wang, J. Rose, K. Ohla, S. Xue, Li Lim, D. Schicker, J. Freiherr, M. Weygandt, Q. Rramani, B. Weber, J. Schultz, B. Pleger
{"title":"食物和金钱奖励的折扣行为和大脑反应差异","authors":"M. Markman, E. Saruco, S. Al-Bas, B. A. Wang, J. Rose, K. Ohla, S. Xue, Li Lim, D. Schicker, J. Freiherr, M. Weygandt, Q. Rramani, B. Weber, J. Schultz, B. Pleger","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most neuroeconomic research seeks to understand how value influences decision-making. The influence of reward type is less well understood. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate delay discounting of primary (i.e., food) and secondary rewards (i.e., money) in 28 healthy, normal-weighted participants (mean age = 26.77; 18 females). To decipher differences in discounting behavior between reward types, we compared how well-different option-based statistical models (exponential, hyperbolic discounting) and attribute-wise heuristic choice models (intertemporal choice heuristic, dual reasoning and implicit framework theory, trade-off model) captured the reward-specific discounting behavior. Contrary to our hypothesis of different strategies for different rewards, we observed comparable discounting behavior for money and food (i.e., exponential discounting). Higher k values for food discounting suggest that individuals decide more impulsive if confronted with food. The fMRI revealed that money discounting was associated with enhanced activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, involved in executive control; the right dorsal striatum, associated with reward processing; and the left hippocampus, involved in memory encoding/retrieval. Food discounting, instead, was associated with higher activity in the left temporoparietal junction suggesting social reinforcement of food decisions. Although our findings do not confirm our hypothesis of different discounting strategies for different reward types, they are in line with the notion that reward types have a significant influence on impulsivity with primary rewards leading to more impulsive choices.","PeriodicalId":506486,"journal":{"name":"eneuro","volume":"93 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward\",\"authors\":\"M. Markman, E. Saruco, S. Al-Bas, B. A. Wang, J. Rose, K. Ohla, S. Xue, Li Lim, D. Schicker, J. Freiherr, M. Weygandt, Q. Rramani, B. Weber, J. Schultz, B. Pleger\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most neuroeconomic research seeks to understand how value influences decision-making. The influence of reward type is less well understood. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate delay discounting of primary (i.e., food) and secondary rewards (i.e., money) in 28 healthy, normal-weighted participants (mean age = 26.77; 18 females). To decipher differences in discounting behavior between reward types, we compared how well-different option-based statistical models (exponential, hyperbolic discounting) and attribute-wise heuristic choice models (intertemporal choice heuristic, dual reasoning and implicit framework theory, trade-off model) captured the reward-specific discounting behavior. Contrary to our hypothesis of different strategies for different rewards, we observed comparable discounting behavior for money and food (i.e., exponential discounting). Higher k values for food discounting suggest that individuals decide more impulsive if confronted with food. The fMRI revealed that money discounting was associated with enhanced activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, involved in executive control; the right dorsal striatum, associated with reward processing; and the left hippocampus, involved in memory encoding/retrieval. Food discounting, instead, was associated with higher activity in the left temporoparietal junction suggesting social reinforcement of food decisions. Although our findings do not confirm our hypothesis of different discounting strategies for different reward types, they are in line with the notion that reward types have a significant influence on impulsivity with primary rewards leading to more impulsive choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eneuro\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eneuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eneuro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大多数神经经济学研究旨在了解价值如何影响决策。而对奖励类型的影响则了解较少。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究了 28 名健康、体重正常的参与者(平均年龄 = 26.77 岁;18 名女性)对主要奖励(即食物)和次要奖励(即金钱)的延迟折现。为了解读不同奖励类型之间贴现行为的差异,我们比较了不同的基于期权的统计模型(指数贴现、双曲贴现)和属性启发式选择模型(时际选择启发式、双重推理和隐含框架理论、权衡模型)对特定奖励贴现行为的捕捉程度。与我们对不同奖励采取不同策略的假设相反,我们观察到金钱和食物的贴现行为相当(即指数贴现)。食物折现的 k 值越高,表明个体在面对食物时做出的决定越冲动。fMRI 显示,金钱折扣与右侧背外侧前额叶皮层(参与执行控制)、右侧背侧纹状体(参与奖赏处理)和左侧海马(参与记忆编码/检索)的活动增强有关。相反,食物折扣与左侧颞顶叶交界处的较高活动相关,这表明食物决策得到了社会强化。尽管我们的研究结果并没有证实我们关于不同奖励类型有不同折现策略的假设,但它们与奖励类型对冲动性有重大影响的观点是一致的,即主要奖励会导致更冲动的选择。
Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward
Most neuroeconomic research seeks to understand how value influences decision-making. The influence of reward type is less well understood. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate delay discounting of primary (i.e., food) and secondary rewards (i.e., money) in 28 healthy, normal-weighted participants (mean age = 26.77; 18 females). To decipher differences in discounting behavior between reward types, we compared how well-different option-based statistical models (exponential, hyperbolic discounting) and attribute-wise heuristic choice models (intertemporal choice heuristic, dual reasoning and implicit framework theory, trade-off model) captured the reward-specific discounting behavior. Contrary to our hypothesis of different strategies for different rewards, we observed comparable discounting behavior for money and food (i.e., exponential discounting). Higher k values for food discounting suggest that individuals decide more impulsive if confronted with food. The fMRI revealed that money discounting was associated with enhanced activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, involved in executive control; the right dorsal striatum, associated with reward processing; and the left hippocampus, involved in memory encoding/retrieval. Food discounting, instead, was associated with higher activity in the left temporoparietal junction suggesting social reinforcement of food decisions. Although our findings do not confirm our hypothesis of different discounting strategies for different reward types, they are in line with the notion that reward types have a significant influence on impulsivity with primary rewards leading to more impulsive choices.