Diah Artati, Moh. Oman, Supriyanto Supriyanto, D. Sukarta, A. Robisalmi
{"title":"使用分析概况指数 (API) 20E KIT 方法验证鉴定嗜水气单胞菌的分析方法","authors":"Diah Artati, Moh. Oman, Supriyanto Supriyanto, D. Sukarta, A. Robisalmi","doi":"10.20473/jmv.vol7.iss1.2024.88-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high demand for fish consumption has an impact on increasing aquaculture productivity and causes the vulnerability of increasing bacterial populations in aquaculture fields, so more rapid handling is needed. The use of phenotypic KIT methods (API 20E) has been applied as a targeted and efficient identification support in targeting better bacterial identification accuracy but often provides unequal results. Method validation is one of the general requirements for the competence of a laboratory evaluation: to provide coherent, interpretable, and accurate results with known uncertainties. The purpose of this study was to validate the API 20E KIT method for the identification of A. hydrophila. The conventional method used as a reference is SNI 7303.1:2015. The validation parameters consisted of determining the limit of detection, sensitivity, and specificity tests, as well as the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The results showed that the limit of the detection value of the API 20E KIT was at a concentration of 100 CFU/mL with an ID of 99.00%. The sensitivity and specificity values in the positive and negative target samples were 100% with a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 0%, respectively. In conclusion, the API 20E KIT method as an alternative test method or rapid test was proven valid for identifying A. hydrophila by the test results using the reference method.","PeriodicalId":17972,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Medik Veteriner","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Analytical Method for Aeromonas hydrophila Identification using Analytical Profile Index (API) 20E KIT Method\",\"authors\":\"Diah Artati, Moh. Oman, Supriyanto Supriyanto, D. Sukarta, A. Robisalmi\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/jmv.vol7.iss1.2024.88-104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The high demand for fish consumption has an impact on increasing aquaculture productivity and causes the vulnerability of increasing bacterial populations in aquaculture fields, so more rapid handling is needed. The use of phenotypic KIT methods (API 20E) has been applied as a targeted and efficient identification support in targeting better bacterial identification accuracy but often provides unequal results. Method validation is one of the general requirements for the competence of a laboratory evaluation: to provide coherent, interpretable, and accurate results with known uncertainties. The purpose of this study was to validate the API 20E KIT method for the identification of A. hydrophila. The conventional method used as a reference is SNI 7303.1:2015. The validation parameters consisted of determining the limit of detection, sensitivity, and specificity tests, as well as the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The results showed that the limit of the detection value of the API 20E KIT was at a concentration of 100 CFU/mL with an ID of 99.00%. The sensitivity and specificity values in the positive and negative target samples were 100% with a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 0%, respectively. In conclusion, the API 20E KIT method as an alternative test method or rapid test was proven valid for identifying A. hydrophila by the test results using the reference method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Medik Veteriner\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Medik Veteriner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol7.iss1.2024.88-104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Medik Veteriner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol7.iss1.2024.88-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对水产品消费的高需求影响了水产养殖生产力的提高,并导致水产养殖场中的细菌数量不断增加,因此需要更快速的处理方法。表型 KIT 方法(API 20E)作为一种有针对性的高效鉴定辅助手段,可提高细菌鉴定的准确性,但其结果往往不一致。方法验证是实验室评估能力的一般要求之一:在已知不确定性的情况下提供连贯、可解释和准确的结果。本研究的目的是验证 API 20E KIT 方法对蚜虫水华的鉴定效果。参照的传统方法是 SNI 7303.1:2015。验证参数包括确定检测限、灵敏度和特异性测试,以及阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果显示,API 20E KIT 的检出限为 100 CFU/mL,ID 值为 99.00%。阳性和阴性目标样本的灵敏度和特异性值均为 100%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0%。总之,API 20E KIT 方法作为一种替代检测方法或快速检测方法,通过使用参考方法的检测结果证明了其在鉴定嗜水蝇方面的有效性。
Validation of Analytical Method for Aeromonas hydrophila Identification using Analytical Profile Index (API) 20E KIT Method
The high demand for fish consumption has an impact on increasing aquaculture productivity and causes the vulnerability of increasing bacterial populations in aquaculture fields, so more rapid handling is needed. The use of phenotypic KIT methods (API 20E) has been applied as a targeted and efficient identification support in targeting better bacterial identification accuracy but often provides unequal results. Method validation is one of the general requirements for the competence of a laboratory evaluation: to provide coherent, interpretable, and accurate results with known uncertainties. The purpose of this study was to validate the API 20E KIT method for the identification of A. hydrophila. The conventional method used as a reference is SNI 7303.1:2015. The validation parameters consisted of determining the limit of detection, sensitivity, and specificity tests, as well as the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The results showed that the limit of the detection value of the API 20E KIT was at a concentration of 100 CFU/mL with an ID of 99.00%. The sensitivity and specificity values in the positive and negative target samples were 100% with a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 0%, respectively. In conclusion, the API 20E KIT method as an alternative test method or rapid test was proven valid for identifying A. hydrophila by the test results using the reference method.