R. Mangat, S.K. Brode, H.K. Mah, M.S. Brar, N.F. Sabur
{"title":"利福平不耐受患者的特征和治疗结果","authors":"R. Mangat, S.K. Brode, H.K. Mah, M.S. Brar, N.F. Sabur","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDRifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study examined patients treated\n for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.RESULTSA total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance\n were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50–78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31–70; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated\n RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in\n patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.CONCLUSIONRIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent\n diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.","PeriodicalId":516613,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD OPEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of and treatment outcomes in rifampicin-intolerant patients\",\"authors\":\"R. Mangat, S.K. Brode, H.K. Mah, M.S. Brar, N.F. Sabur\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUNDRifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study examined patients treated\\n for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.RESULTSA total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance\\n were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50–78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31–70; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated\\n RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in\\n patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.CONCLUSIONRIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent\\n diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD OPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics of and treatment outcomes in rifampicin-intolerant patients
BACKGROUNDRifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study examined patients treated
for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.RESULTSA total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance
were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50–78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31–70; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated
RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in
patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.CONCLUSIONRIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent
diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.