Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka
{"title":"结核病家庭接触者非传染性疾病横断面试点研究","authors":"Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening\n these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood\n households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls.\n Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant\n difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential\n benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.","PeriodicalId":516613,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD OPEN","volume":"60 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot cross-sectional study of non-communicable diseases in TB household contacts\",\"authors\":\"Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening\\n these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood\\n households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls.\\n Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant\\n difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential\\n benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"volume\":\"60 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD OPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景有关肺结核家庭接触者(HHC)中非传染性疾病(NCD)患病率的数据非常有限,但这些数据对于在接触者调查中进行 NCD 综合筛查和护理非常重要。我们在南非和坦桑尼亚开展了一项试验性横断面研究,招募了成年肺结核家庭接触者和邻近家庭的个人(对照组)。我们询问了已知的非传染性疾病,系统地测量了血压,并检测了定点血糖和血红蛋白 A1c。结果 我们招募了 111 名肺结核患者的 203 名成年接触者和 160 名对照者。在接触者中,分别有 12.2% (95% CI 8.3-17.6) 和 39.7% (95% CI 33.1-46.7)患有糖尿病和高血压,而在对照者中,分别有 14.1% (95% CI 9.2-21.0) 和 44.7% (95% CI 36.9-52.7)患有糖尿病和高血压。超过一半的非传染性疾病是新发现的。我们发现接触者中未确诊的 NCD 发病率很高,这表明将 NCD 筛查和护理整合到接触者调查中具有潜在的益处。在同一社区进行筛查也可能发现未确诊的非传染性疾病。
A pilot cross-sectional study of non-communicable diseases in TB household contacts
BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening
these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood
households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls.
Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant
difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential
benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.