熔岩挤压和火山重铺:综述

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hetu Sheth , Anmol Naik , Arunodaya Shekhar , B. Astha , Hrishikesh Samant
{"title":"熔岩挤压和火山重铺:综述","authors":"Hetu Sheth ,&nbsp;Anmol Naik ,&nbsp;Arunodaya Shekhar ,&nbsp;B. Astha ,&nbsp;Hrishikesh Samant","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Squeeze-ups are common features of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth. Squeeze-ups, rootless autointrusions of lava, drive intraflow resurfacing of active flow-fields, and the term is also used for linear or bulbous extrusions (syn. “breakouts”, “outflows”) from cracks in the solid crust, or from tensional clefts on tumuli. Despite the abundance of squeeze-ups in the active or Recent flow-fields of Hawaii, Etna or Iceland, and in the prehistoric continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces, there has been no dedicated study of them for about a century. Here we present a well-illustrated study of squeeze-ups in subaerial basaltic lavas, with a focus on the Deccan Traps CFB province of India, and show that squeeze-ups have a great range of sizes, shapes, orientations, and host flow-field morphologies including pāhoehoe, slabby pāhoehoe, rubbly pāhoehoe, slab-crusted lavas, and ‘a'ā. Squeeze-ups, as the name suggests, originate from overpressurisation of lava flow interiors, caused by mechanisms such as an increased lava flux, progressive downward solidification of the upper crust, crystallisation leading to volatile exsolution (second boiling), viscous fingering, and constricted or blocked lava tubes. The overpressurised lava may create a hydrofracture in the crustal roof in the manner of a dyke, or open an incompletely sealed contact between adjacent flow-units in a compound flow. Similar-looking features formed by passive tapping of interior lava by fractures forming in the cooling, contracting and deforming crust can be termed “lava crack-seals”. We offer a formal discussion of the theoretical and outcrop similarities and differences between dykes and squeeze-ups, features usually easy to distinguish but not always so. We also discuss the distinctions between feeder dykes and pseudodykes, and between squeeze-ups and lava fingers, features often liable to mutual confusion in outcrop. Finally, we review the existing definitions of squeeze-ups, and provide a new formal definition that includes their surface and subsurface realms, the product, and the process: “Squeeze-ups are rootless autointrusions that cause endogenic growth and intraflow resurfacing in lava flow-fields, or rootless extrusions produced by such resurfacing, involving brittle deformation of their host rock.” It is certain that, with future high-resolution remote sensing imagery, squeeze-ups will be recognised on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets other than Earth, given their ubiquity and essential role in the physical development of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"451 ","pages":"Article 108085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lava squeeze-ups and volcanic resurfacing: a review\",\"authors\":\"Hetu Sheth ,&nbsp;Anmol Naik ,&nbsp;Arunodaya Shekhar ,&nbsp;B. Astha ,&nbsp;Hrishikesh Samant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Squeeze-ups are common features of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth. Squeeze-ups, rootless autointrusions of lava, drive intraflow resurfacing of active flow-fields, and the term is also used for linear or bulbous extrusions (syn. “breakouts”, “outflows”) from cracks in the solid crust, or from tensional clefts on tumuli. Despite the abundance of squeeze-ups in the active or Recent flow-fields of Hawaii, Etna or Iceland, and in the prehistoric continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces, there has been no dedicated study of them for about a century. Here we present a well-illustrated study of squeeze-ups in subaerial basaltic lavas, with a focus on the Deccan Traps CFB province of India, and show that squeeze-ups have a great range of sizes, shapes, orientations, and host flow-field morphologies including pāhoehoe, slabby pāhoehoe, rubbly pāhoehoe, slab-crusted lavas, and ‘a'ā. Squeeze-ups, as the name suggests, originate from overpressurisation of lava flow interiors, caused by mechanisms such as an increased lava flux, progressive downward solidification of the upper crust, crystallisation leading to volatile exsolution (second boiling), viscous fingering, and constricted or blocked lava tubes. The overpressurised lava may create a hydrofracture in the crustal roof in the manner of a dyke, or open an incompletely sealed contact between adjacent flow-units in a compound flow. Similar-looking features formed by passive tapping of interior lava by fractures forming in the cooling, contracting and deforming crust can be termed “lava crack-seals”. We offer a formal discussion of the theoretical and outcrop similarities and differences between dykes and squeeze-ups, features usually easy to distinguish but not always so. We also discuss the distinctions between feeder dykes and pseudodykes, and between squeeze-ups and lava fingers, features often liable to mutual confusion in outcrop. Finally, we review the existing definitions of squeeze-ups, and provide a new formal definition that includes their surface and subsurface realms, the product, and the process: “Squeeze-ups are rootless autointrusions that cause endogenic growth and intraflow resurfacing in lava flow-fields, or rootless extrusions produced by such resurfacing, involving brittle deformation of their host rock.” It is certain that, with future high-resolution remote sensing imagery, squeeze-ups will be recognised on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets other than Earth, given their ubiquity and essential role in the physical development of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"volume\":\"451 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324000775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324000775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

挤压隆起是地球上玄武岩熔岩流场的常见特征。挤压隆起是熔岩的无根自生突起,是活动流场流内重现的驱动力,该术语也用于指从固体地壳的裂缝中或从肿瘤上的张力裂缝中挤出的线状或球状隆起(同义词 "突起"、"流出")。尽管在夏威夷、埃特纳或冰岛的活动流场或新近流场以及史前大陆洪积玄武岩(CFB)矿带中存在大量挤出现象,但大约一个世纪以来,一直没有对其进行专门研究。在这里,我们以印度德干陷阱大陆洪积玄武岩省为重点,对亚陆相玄武岩熔岩中的挤压隆起进行了图文并茂的研究,结果表明,挤压隆起有多种大小、形状、方向和主流场形态,包括pāhoehoe、slabby pāhoehoe、rubbly pāhoehoe、slab-crusted lavas和'a'ā。顾名思义,挤压源于熔岩流内部的超压,造成超压的原因包括熔岩流量增加、上部地壳逐渐向下凝固、结晶导致挥发性溶解(二次沸腾)、粘指以及熔岩管收缩或堵塞。超压熔岩可能会在地壳顶部形成堤坝式的水力裂缝,或在复合流中打开相邻流体单元之间未完全密封的接触面。冷却、收缩和变形的地壳中形成的裂缝对内部熔岩的被动敲击所形成的外观类似的特征可称为 "熔岩裂缝密封"。我们正式讨论了堤坝和挤压层之间的理论和露头异同,这些特征通常很容易区分,但并非总是如此。我们还讨论了馈源堤坝和伪堤坝之间的区别,以及挤压隆起和熔岩指之间的区别,这些特征在露头中经常容易相互混淆。最后,我们回顾了现有的挤压上升定义,并提供了一个新的正式定义,包括其地表和地下领域、产物和过程:"挤压隆起是熔岩流场中引起内生性生长和流内重铺的无根自生隆起,或由这种重铺产生的无根挤压隆起,涉及其主岩的脆性变形"。可以肯定的是,通过未来的高分辨率遥感图像,挤压隆起将在地球以外的陆地行星表面被识别出来,因为它们无处不在,而且在地球上玄武岩熔岩流场的物理发展过程中起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lava squeeze-ups and volcanic resurfacing: a review

Lava squeeze-ups and volcanic resurfacing: a review

Squeeze-ups are common features of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth. Squeeze-ups, rootless autointrusions of lava, drive intraflow resurfacing of active flow-fields, and the term is also used for linear or bulbous extrusions (syn. “breakouts”, “outflows”) from cracks in the solid crust, or from tensional clefts on tumuli. Despite the abundance of squeeze-ups in the active or Recent flow-fields of Hawaii, Etna or Iceland, and in the prehistoric continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces, there has been no dedicated study of them for about a century. Here we present a well-illustrated study of squeeze-ups in subaerial basaltic lavas, with a focus on the Deccan Traps CFB province of India, and show that squeeze-ups have a great range of sizes, shapes, orientations, and host flow-field morphologies including pāhoehoe, slabby pāhoehoe, rubbly pāhoehoe, slab-crusted lavas, and ‘a'ā. Squeeze-ups, as the name suggests, originate from overpressurisation of lava flow interiors, caused by mechanisms such as an increased lava flux, progressive downward solidification of the upper crust, crystallisation leading to volatile exsolution (second boiling), viscous fingering, and constricted or blocked lava tubes. The overpressurised lava may create a hydrofracture in the crustal roof in the manner of a dyke, or open an incompletely sealed contact between adjacent flow-units in a compound flow. Similar-looking features formed by passive tapping of interior lava by fractures forming in the cooling, contracting and deforming crust can be termed “lava crack-seals”. We offer a formal discussion of the theoretical and outcrop similarities and differences between dykes and squeeze-ups, features usually easy to distinguish but not always so. We also discuss the distinctions between feeder dykes and pseudodykes, and between squeeze-ups and lava fingers, features often liable to mutual confusion in outcrop. Finally, we review the existing definitions of squeeze-ups, and provide a new formal definition that includes their surface and subsurface realms, the product, and the process: “Squeeze-ups are rootless autointrusions that cause endogenic growth and intraflow resurfacing in lava flow-fields, or rootless extrusions produced by such resurfacing, involving brittle deformation of their host rock.” It is certain that, with future high-resolution remote sensing imagery, squeeze-ups will be recognised on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets other than Earth, given their ubiquity and essential role in the physical development of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
19.7 weeks
期刊介绍: An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society. Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged: (1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations. (2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis. (3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization. (4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing. (5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts. (6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信