{"title":"熔岩挤压和火山重铺:综述","authors":"Hetu Sheth , Anmol Naik , Arunodaya Shekhar , B. Astha , Hrishikesh Samant","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Squeeze-ups are common features of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth. Squeeze-ups, rootless autointrusions of lava, drive intraflow resurfacing of active flow-fields, and the term is also used for linear or bulbous extrusions (syn. “breakouts”, “outflows”) from cracks in the solid crust, or from tensional clefts on tumuli. Despite the abundance of squeeze-ups in the active or Recent flow-fields of Hawaii, Etna or Iceland, and in the prehistoric continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces, there has been no dedicated study of them for about a century. Here we present a well-illustrated study of squeeze-ups in subaerial basaltic lavas, with a focus on the Deccan Traps CFB province of India, and show that squeeze-ups have a great range of sizes, shapes, orientations, and host flow-field morphologies including pāhoehoe, slabby pāhoehoe, rubbly pāhoehoe, slab-crusted lavas, and ‘a'ā. Squeeze-ups, as the name suggests, originate from overpressurisation of lava flow interiors, caused by mechanisms such as an increased lava flux, progressive downward solidification of the upper crust, crystallisation leading to volatile exsolution (second boiling), viscous fingering, and constricted or blocked lava tubes. The overpressurised lava may create a hydrofracture in the crustal roof in the manner of a dyke, or open an incompletely sealed contact between adjacent flow-units in a compound flow. Similar-looking features formed by passive tapping of interior lava by fractures forming in the cooling, contracting and deforming crust can be termed “lava crack-seals”. We offer a formal discussion of the theoretical and outcrop similarities and differences between dykes and squeeze-ups, features usually easy to distinguish but not always so. We also discuss the distinctions between feeder dykes and pseudodykes, and between squeeze-ups and lava fingers, features often liable to mutual confusion in outcrop. Finally, we review the existing definitions of squeeze-ups, and provide a new formal definition that includes their surface and subsurface realms, the product, and the process: “Squeeze-ups are rootless autointrusions that cause endogenic growth and intraflow resurfacing in lava flow-fields, or rootless extrusions produced by such resurfacing, involving brittle deformation of their host rock.” It is certain that, with future high-resolution remote sensing imagery, squeeze-ups will be recognised on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets other than Earth, given their ubiquity and essential role in the physical development of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"451 ","pages":"Article 108085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lava squeeze-ups and volcanic resurfacing: a review\",\"authors\":\"Hetu Sheth , Anmol Naik , Arunodaya Shekhar , B. Astha , Hrishikesh Samant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Squeeze-ups are common features of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth. Squeeze-ups, rootless autointrusions of lava, drive intraflow resurfacing of active flow-fields, and the term is also used for linear or bulbous extrusions (syn. “breakouts”, “outflows”) from cracks in the solid crust, or from tensional clefts on tumuli. Despite the abundance of squeeze-ups in the active or Recent flow-fields of Hawaii, Etna or Iceland, and in the prehistoric continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces, there has been no dedicated study of them for about a century. Here we present a well-illustrated study of squeeze-ups in subaerial basaltic lavas, with a focus on the Deccan Traps CFB province of India, and show that squeeze-ups have a great range of sizes, shapes, orientations, and host flow-field morphologies including pāhoehoe, slabby pāhoehoe, rubbly pāhoehoe, slab-crusted lavas, and ‘a'ā. Squeeze-ups, as the name suggests, originate from overpressurisation of lava flow interiors, caused by mechanisms such as an increased lava flux, progressive downward solidification of the upper crust, crystallisation leading to volatile exsolution (second boiling), viscous fingering, and constricted or blocked lava tubes. The overpressurised lava may create a hydrofracture in the crustal roof in the manner of a dyke, or open an incompletely sealed contact between adjacent flow-units in a compound flow. Similar-looking features formed by passive tapping of interior lava by fractures forming in the cooling, contracting and deforming crust can be termed “lava crack-seals”. We offer a formal discussion of the theoretical and outcrop similarities and differences between dykes and squeeze-ups, features usually easy to distinguish but not always so. We also discuss the distinctions between feeder dykes and pseudodykes, and between squeeze-ups and lava fingers, features often liable to mutual confusion in outcrop. Finally, we review the existing definitions of squeeze-ups, and provide a new formal definition that includes their surface and subsurface realms, the product, and the process: “Squeeze-ups are rootless autointrusions that cause endogenic growth and intraflow resurfacing in lava flow-fields, or rootless extrusions produced by such resurfacing, involving brittle deformation of their host rock.” It is certain that, with future high-resolution remote sensing imagery, squeeze-ups will be recognised on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets other than Earth, given their ubiquity and essential role in the physical development of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"volume\":\"451 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324000775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324000775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lava squeeze-ups and volcanic resurfacing: a review
Squeeze-ups are common features of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth. Squeeze-ups, rootless autointrusions of lava, drive intraflow resurfacing of active flow-fields, and the term is also used for linear or bulbous extrusions (syn. “breakouts”, “outflows”) from cracks in the solid crust, or from tensional clefts on tumuli. Despite the abundance of squeeze-ups in the active or Recent flow-fields of Hawaii, Etna or Iceland, and in the prehistoric continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces, there has been no dedicated study of them for about a century. Here we present a well-illustrated study of squeeze-ups in subaerial basaltic lavas, with a focus on the Deccan Traps CFB province of India, and show that squeeze-ups have a great range of sizes, shapes, orientations, and host flow-field morphologies including pāhoehoe, slabby pāhoehoe, rubbly pāhoehoe, slab-crusted lavas, and ‘a'ā. Squeeze-ups, as the name suggests, originate from overpressurisation of lava flow interiors, caused by mechanisms such as an increased lava flux, progressive downward solidification of the upper crust, crystallisation leading to volatile exsolution (second boiling), viscous fingering, and constricted or blocked lava tubes. The overpressurised lava may create a hydrofracture in the crustal roof in the manner of a dyke, or open an incompletely sealed contact between adjacent flow-units in a compound flow. Similar-looking features formed by passive tapping of interior lava by fractures forming in the cooling, contracting and deforming crust can be termed “lava crack-seals”. We offer a formal discussion of the theoretical and outcrop similarities and differences between dykes and squeeze-ups, features usually easy to distinguish but not always so. We also discuss the distinctions between feeder dykes and pseudodykes, and between squeeze-ups and lava fingers, features often liable to mutual confusion in outcrop. Finally, we review the existing definitions of squeeze-ups, and provide a new formal definition that includes their surface and subsurface realms, the product, and the process: “Squeeze-ups are rootless autointrusions that cause endogenic growth and intraflow resurfacing in lava flow-fields, or rootless extrusions produced by such resurfacing, involving brittle deformation of their host rock.” It is certain that, with future high-resolution remote sensing imagery, squeeze-ups will be recognised on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets other than Earth, given their ubiquity and essential role in the physical development of basaltic lava flow-fields on Earth.
期刊介绍:
An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society.
Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged:
(1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations.
(2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis.
(3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization.
(4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing.
(5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts.
(6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.