以人为本的咨询干预,改善骨质疏松症药物的共同决策和使用(iFraP):一项务实、平行小组、个人随机对照试验方案

L. Bullock, Elaine Nicholls, Andrea Cherrington, S. Butler-Walley, Emma M Clark, Jane Fleming, S. Leyland, Ida Bentley, Simon Thomas, Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia, David Webb, Jo Smith, Sarah Bathers, Sarah Lewis, Angela Clifford, Michele Siciliano, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah Ryan, J. Lefroy, N. Dale, A. Hawarden, Sarah Connacher, Robert Horne, Terence W O'Neill, Christian D Mallen, Clare Jinks, Z. Paskins
{"title":"以人为本的咨询干预,改善骨质疏松症药物的共同决策和使用(iFraP):一项务实、平行小组、个人随机对照试验方案","authors":"L. Bullock, Elaine Nicholls, Andrea Cherrington, S. Butler-Walley, Emma M Clark, Jane Fleming, S. Leyland, Ida Bentley, Simon Thomas, Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia, David Webb, Jo Smith, Sarah Bathers, Sarah Lewis, Angela Clifford, Michele Siciliano, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah Ryan, J. Lefroy, N. Dale, A. Hawarden, Sarah Connacher, Robert Horne, Terence W O'Neill, Christian D Mallen, Clare Jinks, Z. Paskins","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person’s life, beliefs, and values. We developed the improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprising a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service consultations. Two primary objectives to determine (1) the effect of the iFraP intervention on patient-reported ease in decision-making about osteoporosis medicines, and (2) cost-effectiveness of iFraP intervention compared to usual NHS care. Secondary objectives are to determine the iFraP intervention effect on patient reported outcome and experience measures, clinical effectiveness (osteoporosis medicine adherence), and to explore intervention acceptability, mechanisms, and processes underlying observed effects, and intervention implementation. Methods The iFraP trial is a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service, with nested mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants aged ≥50 years (n=380) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two arms: (1) iFraP intervention (iFraP-i) or (2) comparator usual NHS care (iFraP-u) and are followed up at 2-weeks and 3-months. The primary outcome is ease of decision-making assessed 2 weeks after the consultation using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The primary objectives will be addressed by comparing the mean DCS score in each trial arm (using analysis of covariance) for patients given an osteoporosis medicine recommendation, alongside a within-trial cost-effectiveness and value of information (VoI) analysis. Process evaluation data collection includes consultation recordings, semi-structured interviews, and DST analytics. Discussion The iFraP trial will answer important questions about the effectiveness of the new ‘iFraP’ osteoporosis DST, coupled with clinician training, on SDM and informed initiation of osteoporosis medicines. Trial registration: ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"43 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol\",\"authors\":\"L. Bullock, Elaine Nicholls, Andrea Cherrington, S. Butler-Walley, Emma M Clark, Jane Fleming, S. Leyland, Ida Bentley, Simon Thomas, Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia, David Webb, Jo Smith, Sarah Bathers, Sarah Lewis, Angela Clifford, Michele Siciliano, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah Ryan, J. Lefroy, N. Dale, A. Hawarden, Sarah Connacher, Robert Horne, Terence W O'Neill, Christian D Mallen, Clare Jinks, Z. Paskins\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person’s life, beliefs, and values. We developed the improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprising a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service consultations. Two primary objectives to determine (1) the effect of the iFraP intervention on patient-reported ease in decision-making about osteoporosis medicines, and (2) cost-effectiveness of iFraP intervention compared to usual NHS care. Secondary objectives are to determine the iFraP intervention effect on patient reported outcome and experience measures, clinical effectiveness (osteoporosis medicine adherence), and to explore intervention acceptability, mechanisms, and processes underlying observed effects, and intervention implementation. Methods The iFraP trial is a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service, with nested mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants aged ≥50 years (n=380) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two arms: (1) iFraP intervention (iFraP-i) or (2) comparator usual NHS care (iFraP-u) and are followed up at 2-weeks and 3-months. The primary outcome is ease of decision-making assessed 2 weeks after the consultation using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The primary objectives will be addressed by comparing the mean DCS score in each trial arm (using analysis of covariance) for patients given an osteoporosis medicine recommendation, alongside a within-trial cost-effectiveness and value of information (VoI) analysis. Process evaluation data collection includes consultation recordings, semi-structured interviews, and DST analytics. Discussion The iFraP trial will answer important questions about the effectiveness of the new ‘iFraP’ osteoporosis DST, coupled with clinician training, on SDM and informed initiation of osteoporosis medicines. Trial registration: ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"43 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景高质量的共同决策(SDM)对话涉及骨质疏松症患者或高危人群与临床医生的合作,以酌情决定哪些循证药物最适合患者的生活、信仰和价值观。我们开发了提高骨折预防药物治疗吸收率(iFraP)干预措施,包括计算机化决策支持工具(DST)、临床医师培训包和信息资源,用于英国骨折联络服务咨询。两个主要目标是确定:(1) iFraP 干预对患者报告的骨质疏松症药物决策难易程度的影响;(2) iFraP 干预与常规 NHS 护理相比的成本效益。次要目标是确定 iFraP 干预对患者报告的结果和体验指标、临床效果(骨质疏松症药物依从性)的影响,并探讨干预的可接受性、观察到的效果背后的机制和过程以及干预的实施。方法 iFraP 试验是一项务实、平行组、个体随机对照试验,对象是转诊至骨折联络服务机构的患者,采用嵌套混合方法进行过程评估和健康经济分析。年龄≥50 岁的参与者(380 人)按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到两组中的一组:(1) iFraP 干预(iFraP-i)或(2) 对照组常规 NHS 护理(iFraP-u),并在 2 周和 3 个月时接受随访。主要结果是在会诊 2 周后使用决策冲突量表 (DCS) 评估决策的难易程度。将通过比较每个试验组中获得骨质疏松症药物推荐的患者的平均 DCS 得分(使用协方差分析法)以及试验内成本效益和信息价值 (VoI) 分析来实现主要目标。过程评估数据收集包括咨询录音、半结构式访谈和 DST 分析。讨论 iFraP 试验将回答有关新的 "iFraP "骨质疏松症 DST 与临床医师培训相结合对 SDM 和骨质疏松症药物知情启动的有效性的重要问题。试验注册:ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol
Background Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person’s life, beliefs, and values. We developed the improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprising a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service consultations. Two primary objectives to determine (1) the effect of the iFraP intervention on patient-reported ease in decision-making about osteoporosis medicines, and (2) cost-effectiveness of iFraP intervention compared to usual NHS care. Secondary objectives are to determine the iFraP intervention effect on patient reported outcome and experience measures, clinical effectiveness (osteoporosis medicine adherence), and to explore intervention acceptability, mechanisms, and processes underlying observed effects, and intervention implementation. Methods The iFraP trial is a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service, with nested mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants aged ≥50 years (n=380) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two arms: (1) iFraP intervention (iFraP-i) or (2) comparator usual NHS care (iFraP-u) and are followed up at 2-weeks and 3-months. The primary outcome is ease of decision-making assessed 2 weeks after the consultation using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The primary objectives will be addressed by comparing the mean DCS score in each trial arm (using analysis of covariance) for patients given an osteoporosis medicine recommendation, alongside a within-trial cost-effectiveness and value of information (VoI) analysis. Process evaluation data collection includes consultation recordings, semi-structured interviews, and DST analytics. Discussion The iFraP trial will answer important questions about the effectiveness of the new ‘iFraP’ osteoporosis DST, coupled with clinician training, on SDM and informed initiation of osteoporosis medicines. Trial registration: ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信