利用机器学习观察到的生物计量反应量化颗粒物质、二氧化碳、二氧化氮和一氧化氮的吸入浓度

Shisir Ruwali, S. Talebi, Ashen Fernando, Lakitha O. H. Wijeratne, John Waczak, Prabuddha M. H. Dewage, David J. Lary, John Sadler, T. Lary, Matthew Lary, Adam Aker
{"title":"利用机器学习观察到的生物计量反应量化颗粒物质、二氧化碳、二氧化氮和一氧化氮的吸入浓度","authors":"Shisir Ruwali, S. Talebi, Ashen Fernando, Lakitha O. H. Wijeratne, John Waczak, Prabuddha M. H. Dewage, David J. Lary, John Sadler, T. Lary, Matthew Lary, Adam Aker","doi":"10.3390/biomedinformatics4020057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Air pollution has numerous impacts on human health on a variety of time scales. Pollutants such as particulate matter—PM1 and PM2.5, carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and nitric oxide (NO) are exemplars of the wider human exposome. In this study, we adopted a unique approach by utilizing the responses of human autonomic systems to gauge the abundance of pollutants in inhaled air. Objective: To investigate how the human body autonomically responds to inhaled pollutants in microenvironments, including PM1, PM2.5, CO2, NO2, and NO, on small temporal and spatial scales by making use of biometric observations of the human autonomic response. To test the accuracy in predicting the concentrations of these pollutants using biological measurements of the participants. Methodology: Two experimental approaches having a similar methodology that employs a biometric suite to capture the physiological responses of cyclists were compared, and multiple sensors were used to measure the pollutants in the air surrounding them. Machine learning algorithms were used to estimate the levels of these pollutants and decipher the body’s automatic reactions to them. Results: We observed high precision in predicting PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 using a limited set of biometrics measured from the participants, as indicated with the coefficient of determination (R2) between the estimated and true values of these pollutants of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively. Although the predictions for NO2 and NO were reliable at lower concentrations, which was observed qualitatively, the precision varied throughout the data range. Skin temperature, heart rate, and respiration rate were the common physiological responses that were the most influential in predicting the concentration of these pollutants. Conclusion: Biometric measurements can be used to estimate air quality components such as PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 with high degrees of accuracy and can also be used to decipher the effect of these pollutants on the human body using machine learning techniques. The results for NO2 and NO suggest a requirement to improve our models with more comprehensive data collection or advanced machine learning techniques to improve the results for these two pollutants.","PeriodicalId":72394,"journal":{"name":"BioMedInformatics","volume":"1057 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Inhaled Concentrations of Particulate Matter, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Nitric Oxide Using Observed Biometric Responses with Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Shisir Ruwali, S. Talebi, Ashen Fernando, Lakitha O. H. Wijeratne, John Waczak, Prabuddha M. H. Dewage, David J. Lary, John Sadler, T. Lary, Matthew Lary, Adam Aker\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomedinformatics4020057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Air pollution has numerous impacts on human health on a variety of time scales. Pollutants such as particulate matter—PM1 and PM2.5, carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and nitric oxide (NO) are exemplars of the wider human exposome. In this study, we adopted a unique approach by utilizing the responses of human autonomic systems to gauge the abundance of pollutants in inhaled air. Objective: To investigate how the human body autonomically responds to inhaled pollutants in microenvironments, including PM1, PM2.5, CO2, NO2, and NO, on small temporal and spatial scales by making use of biometric observations of the human autonomic response. To test the accuracy in predicting the concentrations of these pollutants using biological measurements of the participants. Methodology: Two experimental approaches having a similar methodology that employs a biometric suite to capture the physiological responses of cyclists were compared, and multiple sensors were used to measure the pollutants in the air surrounding them. Machine learning algorithms were used to estimate the levels of these pollutants and decipher the body’s automatic reactions to them. Results: We observed high precision in predicting PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 using a limited set of biometrics measured from the participants, as indicated with the coefficient of determination (R2) between the estimated and true values of these pollutants of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively. Although the predictions for NO2 and NO were reliable at lower concentrations, which was observed qualitatively, the precision varied throughout the data range. Skin temperature, heart rate, and respiration rate were the common physiological responses that were the most influential in predicting the concentration of these pollutants. Conclusion: Biometric measurements can be used to estimate air quality components such as PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 with high degrees of accuracy and can also be used to decipher the effect of these pollutants on the human body using machine learning techniques. The results for NO2 and NO suggest a requirement to improve our models with more comprehensive data collection or advanced machine learning techniques to improve the results for these two pollutants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMedInformatics\",\"volume\":\"1057 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMedInformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics4020057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedInformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics4020057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:空气污染会在不同时间尺度上对人类健康产生多种影响。颗粒物(PM1 和 PM2.5)、二氧化碳(CO2)、二氧化氮(NO2)和一氧化氮(NO)等污染物是更广泛的人类暴露体的典范。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种独特的方法,利用人体自律神经系统的反应来测量吸入空气中污染物的含量。研究目的通过对人体自律神经系统反应的生物统计学观察,研究人体如何在小时空尺度上对微环境中吸入的污染物(包括 PM1、PM2.5、二氧化碳、二氧化氮和氮氧化物)做出自律反应。测试利用参与者的生物测量结果预测这些污染物浓度的准确性。方法:比较了两种方法类似的实验方法,即采用生物识别套件捕捉骑车者的生理反应,并使用多个传感器测量周围空气中的污染物。使用机器学习算法来估算这些污染物的水平,并解读人体对这些污染物的自动反应。结果:我们观察到,使用从参与者身上测量到的一组有限的生物识别数据,预测 PM1、PM2.5 和 CO2 的精确度很高,这些污染物的估计值和真实值之间的决定系数(R2)分别为 0.99、0.96 和 0.98。虽然对较低浓度的二氧化氮和氮氧化物的预测是可靠的,但在整个数据范围内精确度各不相同。皮肤温度、心率和呼吸频率是对预测这些污染物浓度影响最大的常见生理反应。结论生物计量测量可用于估算空气质量成分,如 PM1、PM2.5 和 CO2,准确度较高,还可用于利用机器学习技术解读这些污染物对人体的影响。二氧化氮和氮氧化物的结果表明,我们需要通过更全面的数据收集或先进的机器学习技术来改进我们的模型,以改善这两种污染物的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Inhaled Concentrations of Particulate Matter, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Nitric Oxide Using Observed Biometric Responses with Machine Learning
Introduction: Air pollution has numerous impacts on human health on a variety of time scales. Pollutants such as particulate matter—PM1 and PM2.5, carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and nitric oxide (NO) are exemplars of the wider human exposome. In this study, we adopted a unique approach by utilizing the responses of human autonomic systems to gauge the abundance of pollutants in inhaled air. Objective: To investigate how the human body autonomically responds to inhaled pollutants in microenvironments, including PM1, PM2.5, CO2, NO2, and NO, on small temporal and spatial scales by making use of biometric observations of the human autonomic response. To test the accuracy in predicting the concentrations of these pollutants using biological measurements of the participants. Methodology: Two experimental approaches having a similar methodology that employs a biometric suite to capture the physiological responses of cyclists were compared, and multiple sensors were used to measure the pollutants in the air surrounding them. Machine learning algorithms were used to estimate the levels of these pollutants and decipher the body’s automatic reactions to them. Results: We observed high precision in predicting PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 using a limited set of biometrics measured from the participants, as indicated with the coefficient of determination (R2) between the estimated and true values of these pollutants of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively. Although the predictions for NO2 and NO were reliable at lower concentrations, which was observed qualitatively, the precision varied throughout the data range. Skin temperature, heart rate, and respiration rate were the common physiological responses that were the most influential in predicting the concentration of these pollutants. Conclusion: Biometric measurements can be used to estimate air quality components such as PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 with high degrees of accuracy and can also be used to decipher the effect of these pollutants on the human body using machine learning techniques. The results for NO2 and NO suggest a requirement to improve our models with more comprehensive data collection or advanced machine learning techniques to improve the results for these two pollutants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信