HERA-lding More Integration in Health?探讨欧盟委员会新卫生应急准备和响应机构的合法性。

Charlotte Godziewski, Simon Rushton
{"title":"HERA-lding More Integration in Health?探讨欧盟委员会新卫生应急准备和响应机构的合法性。","authors":"Charlotte Godziewski, Simon Rushton","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11257008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nSince COVID-19, the European Commission (EC) has sought to expand its activities in health through the development of a 'European Health Union' and within it, the Health Emergencies Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA).\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe applied a discourse analysis on documents establishing HERA to investigate how the creation of this institution was legitimated by the EC. We focused on how it framed health emergencies; how it framed the added value of HERA; and how it linked HERA to existing EU activities and priorities.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nOur analysis demonstrates that security-based logics have been central to the EC's legitimation of HERA - in alignment with a 'securitization of health' occurring worldwide in recent decades. This legitimation can be understood as part of the EC's effort to promote future integration in health in the absence of new competencies.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSecuritization has helped the EC raise its profile in health politically, without additional competencies, thereby laying the groundwork for potential future integration. Looking at the discursive legitimation of HERA sheds light not only on whether the EC is expanding its health powers, but also how it strategizes to do so. HERA, while constrained, allows the EC to further deepen security-driven integration in health.","PeriodicalId":516962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law","volume":"972 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HERA-lding More Integration in Health? Examining the Discursive Legitimation of the European Commission's New Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Godziewski, Simon Rushton\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-11257008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nSince COVID-19, the European Commission (EC) has sought to expand its activities in health through the development of a 'European Health Union' and within it, the Health Emergencies Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA).\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe applied a discourse analysis on documents establishing HERA to investigate how the creation of this institution was legitimated by the EC. We focused on how it framed health emergencies; how it framed the added value of HERA; and how it linked HERA to existing EU activities and priorities.\\n\\n\\nFINDINGS\\nOur analysis demonstrates that security-based logics have been central to the EC's legitimation of HERA - in alignment with a 'securitization of health' occurring worldwide in recent decades. This legitimation can be understood as part of the EC's effort to promote future integration in health in the absence of new competencies.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nSecuritization has helped the EC raise its profile in health politically, without additional competencies, thereby laying the groundwork for potential future integration. Looking at the discursive legitimation of HERA sheds light not only on whether the EC is expanding its health powers, but also how it strategizes to do so. HERA, while constrained, allows the EC to further deepen security-driven integration in health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law\",\"volume\":\"972 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11257008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11257008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自 COVID-19 以来,欧盟委员会(EC)一直试图通过发展 "欧洲卫生联盟 "以及其中的卫生应急准备和响应机构(HERA)来扩大其在卫生领域的活动。方法我们对建立卫生应急准备和响应机构的文件进行了话语分析,以调查欧盟委员会是如何使该机构的建立合法化的。我们的分析表明,基于安全的逻辑是欧盟委员会将 HERA 合法化的核心--这与近几十年来全球范围内发生的 "卫生安全化 "是一致的。这种合法化可以被理解为欧共体在没有新能力的情况下促进未来卫生领域一体化的努力的一部分。结论安全化帮助欧共体在没有额外能力的情况下提高了其在卫生领域的政治地位,从而为未来潜在的一体化奠定了基础。对《医疗卫生改革法》的话语合法化进行研究,不仅可以揭示欧共体是否正在扩大其在医疗卫生领域的权力,还可以了解欧共体是如何为此制定战略的。HERA 虽然受到限制,但允许欧共体进一步深化安全驱动的卫生一体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HERA-lding More Integration in Health? Examining the Discursive Legitimation of the European Commission's New Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority.
CONTEXT Since COVID-19, the European Commission (EC) has sought to expand its activities in health through the development of a 'European Health Union' and within it, the Health Emergencies Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA). METHODS We applied a discourse analysis on documents establishing HERA to investigate how the creation of this institution was legitimated by the EC. We focused on how it framed health emergencies; how it framed the added value of HERA; and how it linked HERA to existing EU activities and priorities. FINDINGS Our analysis demonstrates that security-based logics have been central to the EC's legitimation of HERA - in alignment with a 'securitization of health' occurring worldwide in recent decades. This legitimation can be understood as part of the EC's effort to promote future integration in health in the absence of new competencies. CONCLUSIONS Securitization has helped the EC raise its profile in health politically, without additional competencies, thereby laying the groundwork for potential future integration. Looking at the discursive legitimation of HERA sheds light not only on whether the EC is expanding its health powers, but also how it strategizes to do so. HERA, while constrained, allows the EC to further deepen security-driven integration in health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信