我们的机器活泼得令人不安,而我们自己却惰性十足":重新审视尼尔-布隆坎普斯的科幻电影《超能查派》中具有讽刺意味的亲缘关系

Belinda du Plooy
{"title":"我们的机器活泼得令人不安,而我们自己却惰性十足\":重新审视尼尔-布隆坎普斯的科幻电影《超能查派》中具有讽刺意味的亲缘关系","authors":"Belinda du Plooy","doi":"10.17159/2617-3255/2024/n38a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neill Blomkamp's 2015 science fiction film Chappie engages with the familiar narrative trope of robot sentience. Blomkamp confronts viewers with a naïve and vulnerable childlike robot protagonist that is more human and likeable than any of the stilted and stereotypical real human characters in the film. It is the mechanical creature with which the viewer readily identifies and sympathises. Blomkamp facilitates, not only between his characters, but also with the audience, a kinship of the sort that Donna Haraway in Staying with trouble calls affinity groups or assemblages of 'oddkin'. The immediately sympathetic response of the viewing audience to the mechanical robot is a key strategy in the way that Blomkamp applies irony in this film, which Haraway also identifies as central to her idea of the cyborg as an alternative and potentially liberatory myth. In this article, I engage in a close reading of the film, focusing on the broad network of speculative and science fiction narrative traditions within which this film operates. I consider possible reasons why the film was misread and met with criticism when it was first released. I also specifically investigate the strategies and techniques Blomkamp uses in his depiction of the robot character and how his use of its childlikeness and vulnerability and its engagement with violence and sacrifice are central to the film's ironic engagement with the central argument about the dangers of dehumanisation and the need to recuperate humaneness.","PeriodicalId":288281,"journal":{"name":"Image & Text","volume":"20 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Our machines are disturbingly lively, and we ourselves Mghteningly inert': Reconsidering ironic kinship in Neill Blomkamps science fiction film Chappie\",\"authors\":\"Belinda du Plooy\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2617-3255/2024/n38a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neill Blomkamp's 2015 science fiction film Chappie engages with the familiar narrative trope of robot sentience. Blomkamp confronts viewers with a naïve and vulnerable childlike robot protagonist that is more human and likeable than any of the stilted and stereotypical real human characters in the film. It is the mechanical creature with which the viewer readily identifies and sympathises. Blomkamp facilitates, not only between his characters, but also with the audience, a kinship of the sort that Donna Haraway in Staying with trouble calls affinity groups or assemblages of 'oddkin'. The immediately sympathetic response of the viewing audience to the mechanical robot is a key strategy in the way that Blomkamp applies irony in this film, which Haraway also identifies as central to her idea of the cyborg as an alternative and potentially liberatory myth. In this article, I engage in a close reading of the film, focusing on the broad network of speculative and science fiction narrative traditions within which this film operates. I consider possible reasons why the film was misread and met with criticism when it was first released. I also specifically investigate the strategies and techniques Blomkamp uses in his depiction of the robot character and how his use of its childlikeness and vulnerability and its engagement with violence and sacrifice are central to the film's ironic engagement with the central argument about the dangers of dehumanisation and the need to recuperate humaneness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Image & Text\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Image & Text\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2617-3255/2024/n38a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Image & Text","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2617-3255/2024/n38a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼尔-布洛姆坎普(Neill Blomkamp)2015 年的科幻电影《超能查派》(Chappie)采用了人们熟悉的 "机器人智商 "叙事套路。布洛姆坎普让观众看到了一个天真的、脆弱的、像孩子一样的机器人主角,它比影片中任何一个呆板、刻板的真实人类角色都更有人性,更讨人喜欢。观众很容易认同和同情这种机械生物。布洛姆坎普不仅在角色之间,还与观众建立了一种亲缘关系,唐娜-哈拉维(Donna Haraway)在《留住麻烦》(Staying with trouble)一书中将这种亲缘关系称为 "oddkin "的亲和群体或集合体。观众对机械机器人的即刻同情是布洛姆坎普在本片中运用反讽手法的一个关键策略,哈拉维也认为这是她关于机械人作为另一种潜在解放神话的核心思想。在本文中,我将对影片进行细读,重点关注影片所处的广泛的推理和科幻叙事传统网络。我考虑了影片在上映之初遭到误读和批评的可能原因。我还特别研究了布洛姆坎普在描绘机器人角色时所使用的策略和技巧,以及他是如何利用机器人的稚嫩和脆弱以及它对暴力和牺牲的参与来反讽影片中关于非人化的危险和恢复人性的必要性的核心论点的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Our machines are disturbingly lively, and we ourselves Mghteningly inert': Reconsidering ironic kinship in Neill Blomkamps science fiction film Chappie
Neill Blomkamp's 2015 science fiction film Chappie engages with the familiar narrative trope of robot sentience. Blomkamp confronts viewers with a naïve and vulnerable childlike robot protagonist that is more human and likeable than any of the stilted and stereotypical real human characters in the film. It is the mechanical creature with which the viewer readily identifies and sympathises. Blomkamp facilitates, not only between his characters, but also with the audience, a kinship of the sort that Donna Haraway in Staying with trouble calls affinity groups or assemblages of 'oddkin'. The immediately sympathetic response of the viewing audience to the mechanical robot is a key strategy in the way that Blomkamp applies irony in this film, which Haraway also identifies as central to her idea of the cyborg as an alternative and potentially liberatory myth. In this article, I engage in a close reading of the film, focusing on the broad network of speculative and science fiction narrative traditions within which this film operates. I consider possible reasons why the film was misread and met with criticism when it was first released. I also specifically investigate the strategies and techniques Blomkamp uses in his depiction of the robot character and how his use of its childlikeness and vulnerability and its engagement with violence and sacrifice are central to the film's ironic engagement with the central argument about the dangers of dehumanisation and the need to recuperate humaneness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信