{"title":"\"自由并不自由\":香港反引渡法案抗议活动中的视觉行动主义和分散抵抗","authors":"I. Suglo","doi":"10.1177/01634437241241971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graffiti is widely used in social movements globally, yet media and communication research disproportionately focus on the role of social and new media technologies in protest movements. In this paper I ask why university students – a tech-savvy generation – resorted to graffiti and why campus graffiti were not widely circulated on social media during the Hong Kong anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (ELAB) protests. I argue that graffiti enables dispersed resistance and is one way to mobilize, voice dissent, and preserve memory in an increasingly surveilled and evolving repressive media environment. I pursue this argument by analyzing graffiti photographed on university campuses during the anti-ELAB protests. Situating graffiti within protest culture in Hong Kong, I conclude that graffiti are not always circulated on digital/social media to reach a broader audience. In times of crises, not reaching a wider audience is a manifestation of dispersed resistance in a hybrid media environment.","PeriodicalId":427430,"journal":{"name":"Media, Culture & Society","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Freedom is not free”: Visual activism and dispersed resistance in Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill protests\",\"authors\":\"I. Suglo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01634437241241971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graffiti is widely used in social movements globally, yet media and communication research disproportionately focus on the role of social and new media technologies in protest movements. In this paper I ask why university students – a tech-savvy generation – resorted to graffiti and why campus graffiti were not widely circulated on social media during the Hong Kong anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (ELAB) protests. I argue that graffiti enables dispersed resistance and is one way to mobilize, voice dissent, and preserve memory in an increasingly surveilled and evolving repressive media environment. I pursue this argument by analyzing graffiti photographed on university campuses during the anti-ELAB protests. Situating graffiti within protest culture in Hong Kong, I conclude that graffiti are not always circulated on digital/social media to reach a broader audience. In times of crises, not reaching a wider audience is a manifestation of dispersed resistance in a hybrid media environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media, Culture & Society\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media, Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241241971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241241971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
涂鸦在全球社会运动中被广泛使用,但媒体和传播研究却过多地关注社交和新媒体技术在抗议运动中的作用。在本文中,我将探讨为什么大学生--精通技术的一代--会诉诸涂鸦,以及为什么在香港反引渡法修正案(ELAB)抗议活动中,校园涂鸦没有在社交媒体上广泛传播。我认为,涂鸦能够实现分散的抵抗,是在日益受到监控和不断演变的压制性媒体环境中动员、表达异议和保存记忆的一种方式。我通过分析在反 ELAB 抗议活动中拍摄的大学校园涂鸦来论证这一观点。将涂鸦置于香港抗议文化的背景下,我得出结论:涂鸦并不总是通过数字/社交媒体传播,以获得更广泛的受众。在危机时期,没有更广泛的受众是混合媒体环境中分散抵抗的一种表现。
“Freedom is not free”: Visual activism and dispersed resistance in Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill protests
Graffiti is widely used in social movements globally, yet media and communication research disproportionately focus on the role of social and new media technologies in protest movements. In this paper I ask why university students – a tech-savvy generation – resorted to graffiti and why campus graffiti were not widely circulated on social media during the Hong Kong anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (ELAB) protests. I argue that graffiti enables dispersed resistance and is one way to mobilize, voice dissent, and preserve memory in an increasingly surveilled and evolving repressive media environment. I pursue this argument by analyzing graffiti photographed on university campuses during the anti-ELAB protests. Situating graffiti within protest culture in Hong Kong, I conclude that graffiti are not always circulated on digital/social media to reach a broader audience. In times of crises, not reaching a wider audience is a manifestation of dispersed resistance in a hybrid media environment.