慢性偏头痛预防性药物随机对照试验的研究重点:利益相关者共识研讨会

S. Rees, Andrew Cooklin, Callum Duncan, Manjit Matharu, Seyran Naghdi, Martin Underwood, H. Mistry
{"title":"慢性偏头痛预防性药物随机对照试验的研究重点:利益相关者共识研讨会","authors":"S. Rees, Andrew Cooklin, Callum Duncan, Manjit Matharu, Seyran Naghdi, Martin Underwood, H. Mistry","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13548.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Chronic migraine is a disabling condition that can substantially impact on quality of life. People with chronic migraine have headaches on at least 15 days of every month. Preventative medications aiming to reduce number of days with migraine are available, but high-quality randomised evidence is lacking for many drugs, and it is unclear which medications should be prioritised for research. There is also no existing evidence about patient and clinicians’ priorities for research. Methods We undertook a consensus workshop with patient and healthcare professional stakeholders, using nominal group technique, to understand these stakeholders’ priorities for future randomised controlled trials. We reached a consensus on a set of research recommendations for the field. Results Eight people with chronic migraine and eleven healthcare professionals took part in an online workshop. Comparisons of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP MAbs) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTA) were a top priority for our group. Candesartan and Flunarizine were the top drugs the group wanted to compare against placebo. Conclusions These research recommendations should guide researchers in the field, and funders when prioritising commissioned research and assessing funding applications. Particular areas to explore further are Candesartan or Flunarizine versus placebo, and comparing and combining CGRP MAbs with other medications.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research priorities for randomised controlled trials in chronic migraine preventive medication: A stakeholder consensus workshop\",\"authors\":\"S. Rees, Andrew Cooklin, Callum Duncan, Manjit Matharu, Seyran Naghdi, Martin Underwood, H. Mistry\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13548.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Chronic migraine is a disabling condition that can substantially impact on quality of life. People with chronic migraine have headaches on at least 15 days of every month. Preventative medications aiming to reduce number of days with migraine are available, but high-quality randomised evidence is lacking for many drugs, and it is unclear which medications should be prioritised for research. There is also no existing evidence about patient and clinicians’ priorities for research. Methods We undertook a consensus workshop with patient and healthcare professional stakeholders, using nominal group technique, to understand these stakeholders’ priorities for future randomised controlled trials. We reached a consensus on a set of research recommendations for the field. Results Eight people with chronic migraine and eleven healthcare professionals took part in an online workshop. Comparisons of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP MAbs) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTA) were a top priority for our group. Candesartan and Flunarizine were the top drugs the group wanted to compare against placebo. Conclusions These research recommendations should guide researchers in the field, and funders when prioritising commissioned research and assessing funding applications. Particular areas to explore further are Candesartan or Flunarizine versus placebo, and comparing and combining CGRP MAbs with other medications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13548.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13548.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 慢性偏头痛是一种会严重影响生活质量的致残性疾病。慢性偏头痛患者每月至少有15天会感到头痛。目前已有旨在减少偏头痛发作天数的预防性药物,但许多药物缺乏高质量的随机证据,也不清楚哪些药物应优先进行研究。关于患者和临床医生的研究重点,目前也没有相关证据。方法 我们采用名义小组技术,与患者和医疗保健专业相关人员召开了一次共识研讨会,以了解这些相关人员对未来随机对照试验的优先考虑。我们就该领域的一系列研究建议达成了共识。结果 八名慢性偏头痛患者和十一名医护人员参加了在线研讨会。降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体(CGRP MAbs)和奥那巴曲妥毒素A(BTA)的比较是我们小组的首要任务。坎地沙坦和氟桂利嗪是该小组希望与安慰剂进行比较的首选药物。结论 这些研究建议应为该领域的研究人员和资助者在确定委托研究的优先次序和评估资助申请时提供指导。需要进一步探索的领域包括坎地沙坦或氟桂利嗪与安慰剂的比较,以及 CGRP MAbs 与其他药物的比较和组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research priorities for randomised controlled trials in chronic migraine preventive medication: A stakeholder consensus workshop
Background Chronic migraine is a disabling condition that can substantially impact on quality of life. People with chronic migraine have headaches on at least 15 days of every month. Preventative medications aiming to reduce number of days with migraine are available, but high-quality randomised evidence is lacking for many drugs, and it is unclear which medications should be prioritised for research. There is also no existing evidence about patient and clinicians’ priorities for research. Methods We undertook a consensus workshop with patient and healthcare professional stakeholders, using nominal group technique, to understand these stakeholders’ priorities for future randomised controlled trials. We reached a consensus on a set of research recommendations for the field. Results Eight people with chronic migraine and eleven healthcare professionals took part in an online workshop. Comparisons of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP MAbs) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTA) were a top priority for our group. Candesartan and Flunarizine were the top drugs the group wanted to compare against placebo. Conclusions These research recommendations should guide researchers in the field, and funders when prioritising commissioned research and assessing funding applications. Particular areas to explore further are Candesartan or Flunarizine versus placebo, and comparing and combining CGRP MAbs with other medications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信