服务使用者对康复的看法:爱尔兰心理健康服务中未兑现承诺的构建

C. Swords, Stan Houston
{"title":"服务使用者对康复的看法:爱尔兰心理健康服务中未兑现承诺的构建","authors":"C. Swords, Stan Houston","doi":"10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe concept of personal recovery is now a key pillar of service delivery. It aims to support individuals to flourish and establish a new identity following an acute episode or diagnosis. This view of recovery is unique to each person on that journey. However, there has been a significant focus on measuring these experiences. This paper aims to explore the influence of social constructionism on the concept of recovery within an Irish context, seeking to understand the influence of language, discourse and power on service users’ experiences.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative, interpretivist methodology was adopted for this case study design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 service users. Thematic analysis was chosen as the method of analysis.\n\nFindings\nPersonalising recovery did not always lead to the removal of biological symptoms, but with the appropriate supports, individual’s recovery journey was greatly enhanced. On the contrary, personal recovery places overwhelmingly responsibility on the individual to succeed, largely driven by neoliberal discourse. This focus on individualism and the pressure to succeed was further experienced when people sought to re-integrate into society and participate in normalised social order. Ultimately, for many service users, they viewed personal recovery as an unfulfilled promise.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIt is not a representative sample of service users within an Irish context.\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore influence of social constructionism on the concept of personal recovery within a mental health service context.\n","PeriodicalId":517075,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service user perspectives on recovery: the construction of unfulfilled promises in mental health service delivery in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"C. Swords, Stan Houston\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThe concept of personal recovery is now a key pillar of service delivery. It aims to support individuals to flourish and establish a new identity following an acute episode or diagnosis. This view of recovery is unique to each person on that journey. However, there has been a significant focus on measuring these experiences. This paper aims to explore the influence of social constructionism on the concept of recovery within an Irish context, seeking to understand the influence of language, discourse and power on service users’ experiences.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA qualitative, interpretivist methodology was adopted for this case study design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 service users. Thematic analysis was chosen as the method of analysis.\\n\\nFindings\\nPersonalising recovery did not always lead to the removal of biological symptoms, but with the appropriate supports, individual’s recovery journey was greatly enhanced. On the contrary, personal recovery places overwhelmingly responsibility on the individual to succeed, largely driven by neoliberal discourse. This focus on individualism and the pressure to succeed was further experienced when people sought to re-integrate into society and participate in normalised social order. Ultimately, for many service users, they viewed personal recovery as an unfulfilled promise.\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nIt is not a representative sample of service users within an Irish context.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore influence of social constructionism on the concept of personal recovery within a mental health service context.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":517075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 个人康复的概念现已成为提供服务的关键支柱。其目的是支持个人在急性发作或诊断后茁壮成长并建立新的身份。每个人在康复过程中都有自己独特的看法。然而,人们一直非常关注对这些经历的衡量。本文旨在探讨社会建构主义对爱尔兰康复概念的影响,试图了解语言、话语和权力对服务使用者经历的影响。对 12 名服务使用者进行了半结构化访谈。研究结果个性化康复并不总能消除生理症状,但在适当的支持下,个人的康复历程会得到极大的改善。相反,个人康复在很大程度上是在新自由主义言论的推动下,将取得成功的绝大部分责任推给了个人。当人们试图重新融入社会并参与正常化的社会秩序时,这种对个人主义的关注和成功的压力就会进一步显现出来。最终,对许多服务使用者来说,他们认为个人康复是一个无法实现的承诺。研究局限性/意义据作者所知,这是第一项在精神健康服务背景下探讨社会建构主义对个人康复概念影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Service user perspectives on recovery: the construction of unfulfilled promises in mental health service delivery in Ireland
Purpose The concept of personal recovery is now a key pillar of service delivery. It aims to support individuals to flourish and establish a new identity following an acute episode or diagnosis. This view of recovery is unique to each person on that journey. However, there has been a significant focus on measuring these experiences. This paper aims to explore the influence of social constructionism on the concept of recovery within an Irish context, seeking to understand the influence of language, discourse and power on service users’ experiences. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative, interpretivist methodology was adopted for this case study design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 service users. Thematic analysis was chosen as the method of analysis. Findings Personalising recovery did not always lead to the removal of biological symptoms, but with the appropriate supports, individual’s recovery journey was greatly enhanced. On the contrary, personal recovery places overwhelmingly responsibility on the individual to succeed, largely driven by neoliberal discourse. This focus on individualism and the pressure to succeed was further experienced when people sought to re-integrate into society and participate in normalised social order. Ultimately, for many service users, they viewed personal recovery as an unfulfilled promise. Research limitations/implications It is not a representative sample of service users within an Irish context. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore influence of social constructionism on the concept of personal recovery within a mental health service context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信