{"title":"从 Ivan Cankar 到 Matjaž Kmecl 和 Rudi Šeliga 的美丽 Vida 主题之旅","authors":"Mateja Pezdirc Bartol, Tomaž Toporišič","doi":"10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay revolves around an intriguing part of the still relatively unexplored dramatic opus of Matjaž Kmecl, in which the author explores the Slovenian mythical motif of the beautiful Vida. The analysis focuses on his mono-drama Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta (Beautiful Vida or the Problem of Saint Ožbalt), through which the author enters into a dialogical relationship with a series of Slovenian authors who interpret this key myth of Slovenian literature. The play is a specific continuation of Cankar’s Beautiful Vida, primarily through occasional references to the central motif. On the one hand, the essay will explore the relationship between Kmecl’s Beautiful Vida and Cankar’s prototext. On the other hand, attention will be given to two interpretations of the motif of the beautiful Vida in the 1970s, when Matjaž Kmecl and Rudi Šeligo reimagined and reinterpreted it in innovative ways. These interpretations will be compared and placed in the broader context of contemporary Slovenian drama. While Cankar’s Beautiful Vida was already a vision of longing, and Šeligo’s Vida attempts to formally follow the narrative of a folk song but offers its own and partly new vision of Beautiful Vida through the reinterpretation of lyrical work. But it is Kmecl who radically breaks away from the Slovenian myth, freeing it from Prešeren’s dichotomy and Cankar’s longing.","PeriodicalId":52517,"journal":{"name":"Jezik in Slovstvo","volume":"11 S10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Popotovanje motiva lepe Vide od Ivana Cankarja do Matjaža Kmecla in Rudija Šelige\",\"authors\":\"Mateja Pezdirc Bartol, Tomaž Toporišič\",\"doi\":\"10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay revolves around an intriguing part of the still relatively unexplored dramatic opus of Matjaž Kmecl, in which the author explores the Slovenian mythical motif of the beautiful Vida. The analysis focuses on his mono-drama Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta (Beautiful Vida or the Problem of Saint Ožbalt), through which the author enters into a dialogical relationship with a series of Slovenian authors who interpret this key myth of Slovenian literature. The play is a specific continuation of Cankar’s Beautiful Vida, primarily through occasional references to the central motif. On the one hand, the essay will explore the relationship between Kmecl’s Beautiful Vida and Cankar’s prototext. On the other hand, attention will be given to two interpretations of the motif of the beautiful Vida in the 1970s, when Matjaž Kmecl and Rudi Šeligo reimagined and reinterpreted it in innovative ways. These interpretations will be compared and placed in the broader context of contemporary Slovenian drama. While Cankar’s Beautiful Vida was already a vision of longing, and Šeligo’s Vida attempts to formally follow the narrative of a folk song but offers its own and partly new vision of Beautiful Vida through the reinterpretation of lyrical work. But it is Kmecl who radically breaks away from the Slovenian myth, freeing it from Prešeren’s dichotomy and Cankar’s longing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jezik in Slovstvo\",\"volume\":\"11 S10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jezik in Slovstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezik in Slovstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章围绕马特雅斯-克梅克尔(Matjaž Kmecl)戏剧作品中仍相对未被发掘的引人入胜的部分展开,作者在其中探讨了斯洛文尼亚神话中的美丽维达主题。分析的重点是他的单人剧《美丽的维达或圣奥兹巴尔特的问题》(Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta),通过该剧,作者与一系列斯洛文尼亚作家建立了对话关系,这些作家对斯洛文尼亚文学中的这一重要神话进行了诠释。该剧是坎卡尔《美丽的维达》的具体延续,主要是通过对中心主题的偶尔引用。一方面,文章将探讨 Kmecl 的《美丽的维达》与坎卡尔的原著文本之间的关系。另一方面,文章将关注 20 世纪 70 年代对 "美丽的维达 "这一主题的两种诠释,当时马特雅斯-克梅尔和鲁迪-舍利戈以创新的方式重新想象和诠释了这一主题。我们将对这些诠释进行比较,并将其置于斯洛文尼亚当代戏剧的更广阔背景中。坎卡尔的《美丽的维达》已经是对渴望的憧憬,Šeligo 的《维达》试图在形式上遵循民歌的叙事方式,但通过对抒情作品的重新诠释,对《美丽的维达》提出了自己的、部分全新的看法。然而,正是 Kmecl 从根本上打破了斯洛文尼亚神话,将其从 Prešeren 的二分法和 Cankar 的渴望中解放出来。
Popotovanje motiva lepe Vide od Ivana Cankarja do Matjaža Kmecla in Rudija Šelige
The essay revolves around an intriguing part of the still relatively unexplored dramatic opus of Matjaž Kmecl, in which the author explores the Slovenian mythical motif of the beautiful Vida. The analysis focuses on his mono-drama Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta (Beautiful Vida or the Problem of Saint Ožbalt), through which the author enters into a dialogical relationship with a series of Slovenian authors who interpret this key myth of Slovenian literature. The play is a specific continuation of Cankar’s Beautiful Vida, primarily through occasional references to the central motif. On the one hand, the essay will explore the relationship between Kmecl’s Beautiful Vida and Cankar’s prototext. On the other hand, attention will be given to two interpretations of the motif of the beautiful Vida in the 1970s, when Matjaž Kmecl and Rudi Šeligo reimagined and reinterpreted it in innovative ways. These interpretations will be compared and placed in the broader context of contemporary Slovenian drama. While Cankar’s Beautiful Vida was already a vision of longing, and Šeligo’s Vida attempts to formally follow the narrative of a folk song but offers its own and partly new vision of Beautiful Vida through the reinterpretation of lyrical work. But it is Kmecl who radically breaks away from the Slovenian myth, freeing it from Prešeren’s dichotomy and Cankar’s longing.