Haemoblock 止血物质可减少保乳手术腋窝淋巴结清扫术后血清肿的形成。

Mohamed Izzad Isahak, Muhammad Safwan Abdullah, Raflis Ruzairee Awang, Nor Faezan Abdul Rashid, Seniyah Md Sikin, S. N. Abdullah Suhaimi, Norlia Abdullah, R. Muhammad, Nani Harlina Md Latar
{"title":"Haemoblock 止血物质可减少保乳手术腋窝淋巴结清扫术后血清肿的形成。","authors":"Mohamed Izzad Isahak, Muhammad Safwan Abdullah, Raflis Ruzairee Awang, Nor Faezan Abdul Rashid, Seniyah Md Sikin, S. N. Abdullah Suhaimi, Norlia Abdullah, R. Muhammad, Nani Harlina Md Latar","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer management, necessitates a nuanced understanding of complications that may impede treatment progression. This study scrutinize the impact of Haemoblock hemostatic solution, evaluation it's potential in reducing seroma complication by controlling lymph flow and obliterating axillary dead space.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted with 58 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and ALND, stratified into two groups: Group A (ALND + Haemoblock, n = 29) and Group B (ALND + placebo, n = 29). Postoperative drainage charts were monitored, with the primary endpoint being the time to drain removal, Additionally, patients were observed for surgical site infection (SSI).\n\n\nRESULTS\nGroup A exhibited a marginally higher mean total drain output (398 +/- 205 vs. 326 +/- 198) compared to Group B, this difference did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.176). Equally, the mean time to drain removal demonstrated no discernible distinction between the two groups (6 +/- 3.0 vs. 6 +/- 3.0, Group A vs. Group B, p = 0.526). During follow up, nine patients in Group A required seroma aspiration (mean aspiration 31 +/- 73) as compared to Group B, 6 patients required aspiration (mean aspiration 12 +/- 36), p = 0.222). No notable disparity in SSI rates between the groups was identified.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIn conclusion, the administration of Haemoblock did not manifest a discernible effect in mitigating seroma production, hastening drain removal, or influencing SSI rates following ALND. The study underscores the intricate and multifactorial nature of seroma formation, suggesting avenues for future research to explore combined interventions and protracted follow-up periods for a more comprehensive understanding.","PeriodicalId":507313,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haemoblock hemostatic substance in reducing seroma formation post axillary lymph node dissection following breast conserving surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Izzad Isahak, Muhammad Safwan Abdullah, Raflis Ruzairee Awang, Nor Faezan Abdul Rashid, Seniyah Md Sikin, S. N. Abdullah Suhaimi, Norlia Abdullah, R. Muhammad, Nani Harlina Md Latar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.12134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer management, necessitates a nuanced understanding of complications that may impede treatment progression. This study scrutinize the impact of Haemoblock hemostatic solution, evaluation it's potential in reducing seroma complication by controlling lymph flow and obliterating axillary dead space.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nA prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted with 58 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and ALND, stratified into two groups: Group A (ALND + Haemoblock, n = 29) and Group B (ALND + placebo, n = 29). Postoperative drainage charts were monitored, with the primary endpoint being the time to drain removal, Additionally, patients were observed for surgical site infection (SSI).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nGroup A exhibited a marginally higher mean total drain output (398 +/- 205 vs. 326 +/- 198) compared to Group B, this difference did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.176). Equally, the mean time to drain removal demonstrated no discernible distinction between the two groups (6 +/- 3.0 vs. 6 +/- 3.0, Group A vs. Group B, p = 0.526). During follow up, nine patients in Group A required seroma aspiration (mean aspiration 31 +/- 73) as compared to Group B, 6 patients required aspiration (mean aspiration 12 +/- 36), p = 0.222). No notable disparity in SSI rates between the groups was identified.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nIn conclusion, the administration of Haemoblock did not manifest a discernible effect in mitigating seroma production, hastening drain removal, or influencing SSI rates following ALND. The study underscores the intricate and multifactorial nature of seroma formation, suggesting avenues for future research to explore combined interventions and protracted follow-up periods for a more comprehensive understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景乳腺癌治疗中的腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)需要对可能阻碍治疗进展的并发症有细致入微的了解。本研究仔细研究了 Haemoblock 止血溶液的影响,评估了它通过控制淋巴流和堵塞腋窝死腔来减少血清肿并发症的潜力。方法对 58 名接受保乳手术(BCS)和 ALND 的患者进行了前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验,将其分为两组:A组(ALND + Haemoblock,n = 29)和B组(ALND + 安慰剂,n = 29)。此外,还观察了患者的手术部位感染(SSI)情况。结果与 B 组相比,A 组的平均引流管总输出量略高(398 +/- 205 对 326 +/- 198),但这一差异未达到统计学意义(p = 0.176)。同样,两组患者移除引流管的平均时间也没有明显差异(6 +/- 3.0 vs. 6 +/- 3.0,A 组 vs. B 组,p = 0.526)。在随访期间,A 组有 9 名患者需要进行血清肿抽吸(平均抽吸量为 31 +/- 73),而 B 组有 6 名患者需要进行抽吸(平均抽吸量为 12 +/-36),P = 0.222)。结论:总之,在 ALND术后,使用血凝块对减少血清肿产生、加快引流管移除或影响 SSI 感染率没有明显效果。这项研究强调了血清肿形成的复杂性和多因素性,为今后的研究提供了探索联合干预和长期随访的途径,以便更全面地了解血清肿的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Haemoblock hemostatic substance in reducing seroma formation post axillary lymph node dissection following breast conserving surgery.
BACKGROUND Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer management, necessitates a nuanced understanding of complications that may impede treatment progression. This study scrutinize the impact of Haemoblock hemostatic solution, evaluation it's potential in reducing seroma complication by controlling lymph flow and obliterating axillary dead space. METHOD A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted with 58 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and ALND, stratified into two groups: Group A (ALND + Haemoblock, n = 29) and Group B (ALND + placebo, n = 29). Postoperative drainage charts were monitored, with the primary endpoint being the time to drain removal, Additionally, patients were observed for surgical site infection (SSI). RESULTS Group A exhibited a marginally higher mean total drain output (398 +/- 205 vs. 326 +/- 198) compared to Group B, this difference did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.176). Equally, the mean time to drain removal demonstrated no discernible distinction between the two groups (6 +/- 3.0 vs. 6 +/- 3.0, Group A vs. Group B, p = 0.526). During follow up, nine patients in Group A required seroma aspiration (mean aspiration 31 +/- 73) as compared to Group B, 6 patients required aspiration (mean aspiration 12 +/- 36), p = 0.222). No notable disparity in SSI rates between the groups was identified. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the administration of Haemoblock did not manifest a discernible effect in mitigating seroma production, hastening drain removal, or influencing SSI rates following ALND. The study underscores the intricate and multifactorial nature of seroma formation, suggesting avenues for future research to explore combined interventions and protracted follow-up periods for a more comprehensive understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信