通过电话会议订立契约:网络公证法

Legal Spirit Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.31328/ls.v8i1.5219
Syamsi Ayu Humairah, Padma D. Liman, M. Maskun
{"title":"通过电话会议订立契约:网络公证法","authors":"Syamsi Ayu Humairah, Padma D. Liman, M. Maskun","doi":"10.31328/ls.v8i1.5219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to examine electronic signature arrangements in electronic general meetings of shareholders. and to find out about the proof of the electronically signed deed of the minutes of the general meeting of shareholders. The research was carried out using normative research methods using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis of legal materials uses descriptive analysis which is used to solve problems regarding the legal issues to be researched. The research results show that regulations regarding electronic signatures are contained in Article 1 number 12 of the ITE Law which explains that every electronic signature contains verified electronic information in it. And Article 11 of the ITE Law explains that electronic signatures must have legal force and legal consequences that fulfill the requirements stated in that article. And when using an electronic signature, it must be registered and certified so that legal certainty is guaranteed. Regarding the strength of the evidence, this is still doubtful because in the UUJN itself there is no specific regulation regarding the preparation of deeds carried out electronically. In implementing the GMS, the GMS minutes deed use the legal principle of lex specialis derogate legi generali. Lex generalis is Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m, and lex specialis is the provisions of Article 77 Paragraph (4) UUPT. The legal validity of the deed of the GMS Minutes held via teleconference media still has legal force as an authentic deed and can be used as evidence in court if there are problems in the future.","PeriodicalId":489002,"journal":{"name":"Legal Spirit","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pembuatan Akta Melalui Telekonferensi: Sebuah Hukum Cyber Notary\",\"authors\":\"Syamsi Ayu Humairah, Padma D. Liman, M. Maskun\",\"doi\":\"10.31328/ls.v8i1.5219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to examine electronic signature arrangements in electronic general meetings of shareholders. and to find out about the proof of the electronically signed deed of the minutes of the general meeting of shareholders. The research was carried out using normative research methods using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis of legal materials uses descriptive analysis which is used to solve problems regarding the legal issues to be researched. The research results show that regulations regarding electronic signatures are contained in Article 1 number 12 of the ITE Law which explains that every electronic signature contains verified electronic information in it. And Article 11 of the ITE Law explains that electronic signatures must have legal force and legal consequences that fulfill the requirements stated in that article. And when using an electronic signature, it must be registered and certified so that legal certainty is guaranteed. Regarding the strength of the evidence, this is still doubtful because in the UUJN itself there is no specific regulation regarding the preparation of deeds carried out electronically. In implementing the GMS, the GMS minutes deed use the legal principle of lex specialis derogate legi generali. Lex generalis is Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m, and lex specialis is the provisions of Article 77 Paragraph (4) UUPT. The legal validity of the deed of the GMS Minutes held via teleconference media still has legal force as an authentic deed and can be used as evidence in court if there are problems in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Spirit\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Spirit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Spirit","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在考察电子股东大会中的电子签名安排,并了解电子签名的股东大会会议记录契约的证明。研究采用了规范研究方法,使用了法定方法和概念方法。对法律材料的分析采用描述性分析,用于解决要研究的法律问题。研究结果表明,《信息技术教育法》第 1 条第 12 款载有关于电子签名的规定,其中解释说每个电子签名都包含经过验证的电子信息。ITE 法》第 11 条规定,电子签名必须具有法律效力和法律后果,并满足该条规定的要求。在使用电子签名时,必须对其进行登记和认证,以保证法律的确定性。至于证据的效力,这一点仍然值得怀疑,因为《统一司法系统》本身并没有关于以电子方式准备契约的具体规定。在实施 GMS 时,GMS 会议记录契约使用了特别法减损一般法的法律原则。普通法是指第 16 条第 1 款 m 项,特别法是指 UUPT 第 77 条第 4 款。通过电话会议媒体召开的全球监测系统会议记录契约的法律效力作为真实契约仍然具有法律效力,如果将来出现问题,可以作为法庭证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pembuatan Akta Melalui Telekonferensi: Sebuah Hukum Cyber Notary
This research aims to examine electronic signature arrangements in electronic general meetings of shareholders. and to find out about the proof of the electronically signed deed of the minutes of the general meeting of shareholders. The research was carried out using normative research methods using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis of legal materials uses descriptive analysis which is used to solve problems regarding the legal issues to be researched. The research results show that regulations regarding electronic signatures are contained in Article 1 number 12 of the ITE Law which explains that every electronic signature contains verified electronic information in it. And Article 11 of the ITE Law explains that electronic signatures must have legal force and legal consequences that fulfill the requirements stated in that article. And when using an electronic signature, it must be registered and certified so that legal certainty is guaranteed. Regarding the strength of the evidence, this is still doubtful because in the UUJN itself there is no specific regulation regarding the preparation of deeds carried out electronically. In implementing the GMS, the GMS minutes deed use the legal principle of lex specialis derogate legi generali. Lex generalis is Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m, and lex specialis is the provisions of Article 77 Paragraph (4) UUPT. The legal validity of the deed of the GMS Minutes held via teleconference media still has legal force as an authentic deed and can be used as evidence in court if there are problems in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信