A. Gowtham, Ch. Kesava Manikanta, Ch. Prasanth Kumar, Ch. Sai, Sundara Raghuram, B. S. Jyothi
{"title":"利用集合学习技术检测慢性肾脏病及其比较研究","authors":"A. Gowtham, Ch. Kesava Manikanta, Ch. Prasanth Kumar, Ch. Sai, Sundara Raghuram, B. S. Jyothi","doi":"10.36713/epra16316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common health problem around the globe, chronic kidney disease (CKD) must be identified early in order to be effectively managed. The accuracy of CKD diagnosis may be increased with the use of machine learning approaches, especially ensemble learning. In order to determine which model performs best for CKD detection, this research will compare and contrast several ensemble learning strategies. Ten distinct models are evaluated in the study: Bagging, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree, Decision Tree after Pruning, Logistic Regression, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. A CKD dataset is used to evaluate these models based on criteria including accuracy, precision score, and recall score. The comparative study results demonstrate how ensemble learning techniques might raise CKD detection accuracy. The findings provide crucial details about the optimal model for CKD detection, which can help with early diagnosis and better patient outcomes.\n KEYWORDS: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Ensemble Learning, Machine Learning, Accuracy, Early Diagnosis","PeriodicalId":114964,"journal":{"name":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE DETECTION USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING TECHNIQUES AND COMPARATIVE STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Gowtham, Ch. Kesava Manikanta, Ch. Prasanth Kumar, Ch. Sai, Sundara Raghuram, B. S. Jyothi\",\"doi\":\"10.36713/epra16316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common health problem around the globe, chronic kidney disease (CKD) must be identified early in order to be effectively managed. The accuracy of CKD diagnosis may be increased with the use of machine learning approaches, especially ensemble learning. In order to determine which model performs best for CKD detection, this research will compare and contrast several ensemble learning strategies. Ten distinct models are evaluated in the study: Bagging, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree, Decision Tree after Pruning, Logistic Regression, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. A CKD dataset is used to evaluate these models based on criteria including accuracy, precision score, and recall score. The comparative study results demonstrate how ensemble learning techniques might raise CKD detection accuracy. The findings provide crucial details about the optimal model for CKD detection, which can help with early diagnosis and better patient outcomes.\\n KEYWORDS: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Ensemble Learning, Machine Learning, Accuracy, Early Diagnosis\",\"PeriodicalId\":114964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
慢性肾脏病(CKD)是全球常见的健康问题,必须及早发现,才能有效控制。使用机器学习方法,特别是集合学习,可以提高慢性肾脏病诊断的准确性。为了确定哪种模型在 CKD 检测中表现最佳,本研究将对几种集合学习策略进行比较和对比。本研究评估了十种不同的模型:这些模型包括:袋状模型(Bagging)、随机森林模型(Random Forest)、梯度提升模型(Gradient Boosting)、Ada 提升模型(Ada Boosting)、XGBoost 模型、K-近邻模型(KNN)、决策树模型(Decision Tree)、剪枝后决策树模型(Decision Tree after Pruning)、逻辑回归模型(Logistic Regression)和线性判别分析模型(Linear Discriminant Analysis)。CKD 数据集用于根据准确率、精确度得分和召回得分等标准对这些模型进行评估。比较研究结果表明了集合学习技术可如何提高 CKD 检测准确率。研究结果提供了有关慢性肾脏病检测最佳模型的重要细节,有助于早期诊断和改善患者预后。关键词: 慢性肾病(CKD)、集合学习、机器学习、准确性、早期诊断
CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE DETECTION USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING TECHNIQUES AND COMPARATIVE STUDY
A common health problem around the globe, chronic kidney disease (CKD) must be identified early in order to be effectively managed. The accuracy of CKD diagnosis may be increased with the use of machine learning approaches, especially ensemble learning. In order to determine which model performs best for CKD detection, this research will compare and contrast several ensemble learning strategies. Ten distinct models are evaluated in the study: Bagging, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree, Decision Tree after Pruning, Logistic Regression, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. A CKD dataset is used to evaluate these models based on criteria including accuracy, precision score, and recall score. The comparative study results demonstrate how ensemble learning techniques might raise CKD detection accuracy. The findings provide crucial details about the optimal model for CKD detection, which can help with early diagnosis and better patient outcomes.
KEYWORDS: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Ensemble Learning, Machine Learning, Accuracy, Early Diagnosis