利用集合学习技术检测慢性肾脏病及其比较研究

A. Gowtham, Ch. Kesava Manikanta, Ch. Prasanth Kumar, Ch. Sai, Sundara Raghuram, B. S. Jyothi
{"title":"利用集合学习技术检测慢性肾脏病及其比较研究","authors":"A. Gowtham, Ch. Kesava Manikanta, Ch. Prasanth Kumar, Ch. Sai, Sundara Raghuram, B. S. Jyothi","doi":"10.36713/epra16316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common health problem around the globe, chronic kidney disease (CKD) must be identified early in order to be effectively managed. The accuracy of CKD diagnosis may be increased with the use of machine learning approaches, especially ensemble learning. In order to determine which model performs best for CKD detection, this research will compare and contrast several ensemble learning strategies. Ten distinct models are evaluated in the study: Bagging, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree, Decision Tree after Pruning, Logistic Regression, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. A CKD dataset is used to evaluate these models based on criteria including accuracy, precision score, and recall score. The comparative study results demonstrate how ensemble learning techniques might raise CKD detection accuracy. The findings provide crucial details about the optimal model for CKD detection, which can help with early diagnosis and better patient outcomes.\n KEYWORDS: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Ensemble Learning, Machine Learning, Accuracy, Early Diagnosis","PeriodicalId":114964,"journal":{"name":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE DETECTION USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING TECHNIQUES AND COMPARATIVE STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Gowtham, Ch. Kesava Manikanta, Ch. Prasanth Kumar, Ch. Sai, Sundara Raghuram, B. S. Jyothi\",\"doi\":\"10.36713/epra16316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common health problem around the globe, chronic kidney disease (CKD) must be identified early in order to be effectively managed. The accuracy of CKD diagnosis may be increased with the use of machine learning approaches, especially ensemble learning. In order to determine which model performs best for CKD detection, this research will compare and contrast several ensemble learning strategies. Ten distinct models are evaluated in the study: Bagging, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree, Decision Tree after Pruning, Logistic Regression, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. A CKD dataset is used to evaluate these models based on criteria including accuracy, precision score, and recall score. The comparative study results demonstrate how ensemble learning techniques might raise CKD detection accuracy. The findings provide crucial details about the optimal model for CKD detection, which can help with early diagnosis and better patient outcomes.\\n KEYWORDS: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Ensemble Learning, Machine Learning, Accuracy, Early Diagnosis\",\"PeriodicalId\":114964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性肾脏病(CKD)是全球常见的健康问题,必须及早发现,才能有效控制。使用机器学习方法,特别是集合学习,可以提高慢性肾脏病诊断的准确性。为了确定哪种模型在 CKD 检测中表现最佳,本研究将对几种集合学习策略进行比较和对比。本研究评估了十种不同的模型:这些模型包括:袋状模型(Bagging)、随机森林模型(Random Forest)、梯度提升模型(Gradient Boosting)、Ada 提升模型(Ada Boosting)、XGBoost 模型、K-近邻模型(KNN)、决策树模型(Decision Tree)、剪枝后决策树模型(Decision Tree after Pruning)、逻辑回归模型(Logistic Regression)和线性判别分析模型(Linear Discriminant Analysis)。CKD 数据集用于根据准确率、精确度得分和召回得分等标准对这些模型进行评估。比较研究结果表明了集合学习技术可如何提高 CKD 检测准确率。研究结果提供了有关慢性肾脏病检测最佳模型的重要细节,有助于早期诊断和改善患者预后。关键词: 慢性肾病(CKD)、集合学习、机器学习、准确性、早期诊断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE DETECTION USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING TECHNIQUES AND COMPARATIVE STUDY
A common health problem around the globe, chronic kidney disease (CKD) must be identified early in order to be effectively managed. The accuracy of CKD diagnosis may be increased with the use of machine learning approaches, especially ensemble learning. In order to determine which model performs best for CKD detection, this research will compare and contrast several ensemble learning strategies. Ten distinct models are evaluated in the study: Bagging, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree, Decision Tree after Pruning, Logistic Regression, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. A CKD dataset is used to evaluate these models based on criteria including accuracy, precision score, and recall score. The comparative study results demonstrate how ensemble learning techniques might raise CKD detection accuracy. The findings provide crucial details about the optimal model for CKD detection, which can help with early diagnosis and better patient outcomes. KEYWORDS: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Ensemble Learning, Machine Learning, Accuracy, Early Diagnosis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信