处理放射学与病理学不一致的乳腺病变的方法:基于 3 例术后诊断为恶性肿瘤病例的讨论

Sümeyra Emine Bölük, G. Ercan, L. Ercan
{"title":"处理放射学与病理学不一致的乳腺病变的方法:基于 3 例术后诊断为恶性肿瘤病例的讨论","authors":"Sümeyra Emine Bölük, G. Ercan, L. Ercan","doi":"10.4274/cmj.galenos.2024.49469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breast lesions are mainly classified as benign and malignant. When breast cancer is diagnosed, the patient is evaluated and a treatment plan is prepared. For benign lesions, follow-up or surgery may be performed. Imaging and biopsy results are essential when deciding on surgery. In particular, when there is a discrepancy between radiologic imaging and pathology results, excision may be useful for definitive diagnosis. We planned to present an approach to suspicious breast lesions with radiology pathology discordance through the presentation of three patients diagnosed with malignancy. Between February 2018 and March 2023, patients who underwent wire marking and excision for suspicious breast lesions were analyzed. Three patients diagnosed with malignancy after total excision were analyzed in detail. Of 33 patients, 2 (6.06%) patients had ductal carcinoma in situ and 1 (3.03%) patient had invasive tubular carcinoma. Preoperative and postoperative pathological findings were consistent with benign changes in all three cases. After total excision, a definitive diagnosis was made, and follow-up and treatment were planned. In cases of radiology-pathology discordance, total excision may be effective in detecting atypia, carcinoma in situ , or invasive carcinoma not detected on pathologic examination. Therefore, even if the biopsy result is not malignant, wire-guided total excision of radiologically suspicious lesions should be considered as a diagnosis and treatment method.","PeriodicalId":202518,"journal":{"name":"Caucasian Medical Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approach to Breast Lesions with Radiology-pathology Discrepancy: Discussion Based on 3 Cases Diagnosed with Malignancy After Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Sümeyra Emine Bölük, G. Ercan, L. Ercan\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/cmj.galenos.2024.49469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breast lesions are mainly classified as benign and malignant. When breast cancer is diagnosed, the patient is evaluated and a treatment plan is prepared. For benign lesions, follow-up or surgery may be performed. Imaging and biopsy results are essential when deciding on surgery. In particular, when there is a discrepancy between radiologic imaging and pathology results, excision may be useful for definitive diagnosis. We planned to present an approach to suspicious breast lesions with radiology pathology discordance through the presentation of three patients diagnosed with malignancy. Between February 2018 and March 2023, patients who underwent wire marking and excision for suspicious breast lesions were analyzed. Three patients diagnosed with malignancy after total excision were analyzed in detail. Of 33 patients, 2 (6.06%) patients had ductal carcinoma in situ and 1 (3.03%) patient had invasive tubular carcinoma. Preoperative and postoperative pathological findings were consistent with benign changes in all three cases. After total excision, a definitive diagnosis was made, and follow-up and treatment were planned. In cases of radiology-pathology discordance, total excision may be effective in detecting atypia, carcinoma in situ , or invasive carcinoma not detected on pathologic examination. Therefore, even if the biopsy result is not malignant, wire-guided total excision of radiologically suspicious lesions should be considered as a diagnosis and treatment method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caucasian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caucasian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/cmj.galenos.2024.49469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caucasian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/cmj.galenos.2024.49469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳房病变主要分为良性和恶性。当确诊为乳腺癌时,医生会对患者进行评估,并制定治疗方案。对于良性病变,可进行随访或手术。在决定手术时,成像和活检结果至关重要。特别是当放射成像和病理结果不一致时,切除术可能有助于明确诊断。我们计划通过介绍三名确诊为恶性肿瘤的患者,介绍一种处理放射病理不一致的可疑乳腺病变的方法。我们对 2018 年 2 月至 2023 年 3 月间,因乳腺可疑病变而接受线切割的患者进行了分析。详细分析了全切后确诊为恶性肿瘤的三名患者。在33名患者中,2名(6.06%)患者患有导管原位癌,1名(3.03%)患者患有浸润性管状癌。这三例患者的术前和术后病理结果均为良性病变。全切手术后,医生做出了明确诊断,并计划进行后续治疗。在放射学和病理学结果不一致的情况下,全切术可以有效地发现不典型性、原位癌或病理学检查未发现的浸润性癌。因此,即使活检结果不是恶性的,也应考虑将线导全切术作为诊断和治疗放射学可疑病变的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approach to Breast Lesions with Radiology-pathology Discrepancy: Discussion Based on 3 Cases Diagnosed with Malignancy After Surgery
Breast lesions are mainly classified as benign and malignant. When breast cancer is diagnosed, the patient is evaluated and a treatment plan is prepared. For benign lesions, follow-up or surgery may be performed. Imaging and biopsy results are essential when deciding on surgery. In particular, when there is a discrepancy between radiologic imaging and pathology results, excision may be useful for definitive diagnosis. We planned to present an approach to suspicious breast lesions with radiology pathology discordance through the presentation of three patients diagnosed with malignancy. Between February 2018 and March 2023, patients who underwent wire marking and excision for suspicious breast lesions were analyzed. Three patients diagnosed with malignancy after total excision were analyzed in detail. Of 33 patients, 2 (6.06%) patients had ductal carcinoma in situ and 1 (3.03%) patient had invasive tubular carcinoma. Preoperative and postoperative pathological findings were consistent with benign changes in all three cases. After total excision, a definitive diagnosis was made, and follow-up and treatment were planned. In cases of radiology-pathology discordance, total excision may be effective in detecting atypia, carcinoma in situ , or invasive carcinoma not detected on pathologic examination. Therefore, even if the biopsy result is not malignant, wire-guided total excision of radiologically suspicious lesions should be considered as a diagnosis and treatment method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信