{"title":"去标识化和匿名化:法律和技术方法","authors":"Sardor Mamanazarov","doi":"10.51788/tsul.lr.5.1./tcyn1311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This study analyzes legal and technical approaches to data de-identification and anonymization, motivated by the need to develop balanced standards that preserve privacy without stifling beneficial data uses. Doctrinal and technical literature review methods examine provisions in major data protection laws worldwide, including the EU's GDPR, US HIPAA, and emerging frameworks in China, India, and Uzbekistan, alongside mathematical models like differential privacy and k-anonymity. The legal analysis reveals common themes like flexible research exemptions for anonymized data and calibrating standards based on sensitivity, but also gaps such as ambiguities around pseudonymization. The technical review highlights the strengths and weaknesses of encryption, perturbation, generalization, and federation techniques, emphasizing the need to complement mathematical methods with governance controls. Key findings include the importance of allowing contextual optimization, providing detailed regulatory guidance, and addressing re-identification incentives. Recommendations are provided for advancing Uzbekistan's data protection laws and practices based on international experiences, such as enabling public oversight, conducting localized impact assessments, and promoting privacy-enhancing technologies. The study concludes that to anonymize data in a way that enables research while also protecting people's rights, we need a comprehensive approach that includes laws, organizational rules, technical safeguards, ethical decision-making, and public input. All of these parts working together is important for successful data anonymization.\"","PeriodicalId":515528,"journal":{"name":"Tsul legal report","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-identification and anonymization: legal and technical approaches\",\"authors\":\"Sardor Mamanazarov\",\"doi\":\"10.51788/tsul.lr.5.1./tcyn1311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This study analyzes legal and technical approaches to data de-identification and anonymization, motivated by the need to develop balanced standards that preserve privacy without stifling beneficial data uses. Doctrinal and technical literature review methods examine provisions in major data protection laws worldwide, including the EU's GDPR, US HIPAA, and emerging frameworks in China, India, and Uzbekistan, alongside mathematical models like differential privacy and k-anonymity. The legal analysis reveals common themes like flexible research exemptions for anonymized data and calibrating standards based on sensitivity, but also gaps such as ambiguities around pseudonymization. The technical review highlights the strengths and weaknesses of encryption, perturbation, generalization, and federation techniques, emphasizing the need to complement mathematical methods with governance controls. Key findings include the importance of allowing contextual optimization, providing detailed regulatory guidance, and addressing re-identification incentives. Recommendations are provided for advancing Uzbekistan's data protection laws and practices based on international experiences, such as enabling public oversight, conducting localized impact assessments, and promoting privacy-enhancing technologies. The study concludes that to anonymize data in a way that enables research while also protecting people's rights, we need a comprehensive approach that includes laws, organizational rules, technical safeguards, ethical decision-making, and public input. All of these parts working together is important for successful data anonymization.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":515528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tsul legal report\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tsul legal report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.lr.5.1./tcyn1311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsul legal report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.lr.5.1./tcyn1311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
"本研究分析了数据去标识化和匿名化的法律和技术方法,其动机是需要制定平衡的标准,既保护隐私,又不扼杀有益的数据用途。理论和技术文献综述方法研究了全球主要数据保护法律的规定,包括欧盟的 GDPR、美国的 HIPAA 以及中国、印度和乌兹别克斯坦的新兴框架,同时还研究了差分隐私和 k 匿名等数学模型。法律分析揭示了共同的主题,如匿名数据的灵活研究豁免和基于敏感性的标准校准,但也存在差距,如化名的模糊性。技术审查突出了加密、扰动、泛化和联合技术的优缺点,强调需要用管理控制来补充数学方法。主要发现包括允许上下文优化、提供详细的监管指导和解决重新识别动机的重要性。研究还根据国际经验提出了推进乌兹别克斯坦数据保护法律和实践的建议,如允许公众监督、开展本地化影响评估、推广隐私增强技术等。研究报告的结论是,要以既能开展研究又能保护人们权利的方式进行匿名数据处理,我们需要一种全面的方法,其中包括法律、组织规则、技术保障、道德决策和公众意见。所有这些部分协同工作对于数据匿名化的成功非常重要"。
De-identification and anonymization: legal and technical approaches
"This study analyzes legal and technical approaches to data de-identification and anonymization, motivated by the need to develop balanced standards that preserve privacy without stifling beneficial data uses. Doctrinal and technical literature review methods examine provisions in major data protection laws worldwide, including the EU's GDPR, US HIPAA, and emerging frameworks in China, India, and Uzbekistan, alongside mathematical models like differential privacy and k-anonymity. The legal analysis reveals common themes like flexible research exemptions for anonymized data and calibrating standards based on sensitivity, but also gaps such as ambiguities around pseudonymization. The technical review highlights the strengths and weaknesses of encryption, perturbation, generalization, and federation techniques, emphasizing the need to complement mathematical methods with governance controls. Key findings include the importance of allowing contextual optimization, providing detailed regulatory guidance, and addressing re-identification incentives. Recommendations are provided for advancing Uzbekistan's data protection laws and practices based on international experiences, such as enabling public oversight, conducting localized impact assessments, and promoting privacy-enhancing technologies. The study concludes that to anonymize data in a way that enables research while also protecting people's rights, we need a comprehensive approach that includes laws, organizational rules, technical safeguards, ethical decision-making, and public input. All of these parts working together is important for successful data anonymization."