Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinícius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva
{"title":"与 COVID-19 患者机械通气相关的 NOC 结果的内容分析","authors":"Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinícius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult”, for patients with severe COVID-19. Method: Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group. Results: All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and 22 indicators “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult” were thus constructed. Conclusion: The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.","PeriodicalId":21253,"journal":{"name":"Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp","volume":"38 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinícius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult”, for patients with severe COVID-19. Method: Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group. Results: All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and 22 indicators “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult” were thus constructed. Conclusion: The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp\",\"volume\":\"38 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19
ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult”, for patients with severe COVID-19. Method: Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group. Results: All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and 22 indicators “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult” were thus constructed. Conclusion: The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.