为什么 1798 年没有废除奴隶制?

Dirk Alkemade
{"title":"为什么 1798 年没有废除奴隶制?","authors":"Dirk Alkemade","doi":"10.51769/bmgn-lchr.12807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘problem of slavery’ was an important moral issue in the eighteenth-century  Dutch enlightened press, but the increase in publications on this topic did not  lead to any serious attempts to abolish the practice. This seemed to change during  the Batavian Revolution, when abolition was briefly discussed in parliament. This article analyses Dutch anti-slavery debates, especially within the context of the Dutch revolutionary parliament in 1797. It shows that the humanitarian sentiments in these debates did not automatically lead to support for abolition. Only radical representatives argued for the abolishment of slavery on the grounds of ‘human rights’. On this basis, this article posits a hermeneutical distinction between anti-slavery and abolition.","PeriodicalId":504931,"journal":{"name":"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why was Slavery not Abolished in 1798?\",\"authors\":\"Dirk Alkemade\",\"doi\":\"10.51769/bmgn-lchr.12807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ‘problem of slavery’ was an important moral issue in the eighteenth-century  Dutch enlightened press, but the increase in publications on this topic did not  lead to any serious attempts to abolish the practice. This seemed to change during  the Batavian Revolution, when abolition was briefly discussed in parliament. This article analyses Dutch anti-slavery debates, especially within the context of the Dutch revolutionary parliament in 1797. It shows that the humanitarian sentiments in these debates did not automatically lead to support for abolition. Only radical representatives argued for the abolishment of slavery on the grounds of ‘human rights’. On this basis, this article posits a hermeneutical distinction between anti-slavery and abolition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.12807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.12807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奴隶制问题 "是十八世纪荷兰开明报刊的一个重要道德问题,但有关这一主题的出版物的增加并没有导致废除奴隶制的认真尝试。这种情况在巴达维亚革命期间似乎有所改变,议会曾短暂讨论过废除奴隶制的问题。本文分析了荷兰反奴隶制的辩论,尤其是在 1797 年荷兰革命议会的背景下。文章表明,这些辩论中的人道主义情绪并不会自动导致对废除奴隶制的支持。只有激进的代表以 "人权 "为由主张废除奴隶制。在此基础上,本文提出了反奴隶制与废除奴隶制之间的诠释学区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why was Slavery not Abolished in 1798?
The ‘problem of slavery’ was an important moral issue in the eighteenth-century  Dutch enlightened press, but the increase in publications on this topic did not  lead to any serious attempts to abolish the practice. This seemed to change during  the Batavian Revolution, when abolition was briefly discussed in parliament. This article analyses Dutch anti-slavery debates, especially within the context of the Dutch revolutionary parliament in 1797. It shows that the humanitarian sentiments in these debates did not automatically lead to support for abolition. Only radical representatives argued for the abolishment of slavery on the grounds of ‘human rights’. On this basis, this article posits a hermeneutical distinction between anti-slavery and abolition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信