信用卡欺诈检测中的可解释人工智能:可解释的模型和透明的决策,提高美国的信任度和合规性

Md Rokibul Hasan, Sumon Gazi, N. Gurung
{"title":"信用卡欺诈检测中的可解释人工智能:可解释的模型和透明的决策,提高美国的信任度和合规性","authors":"Md Rokibul Hasan, Sumon Gazi, N. Gurung","doi":"10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit Card Fraud presents significant challenges across various domains, comprising, healthcare, insurance, finance, and e-commerce.  The principal objective of this research was to examine the efficacy of Machine Learning techniques in detecting credit card fraud. Four key Machine Learning techniques were employed, notably, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network. Subsequently, model performance was evaluated using Precision, Recall, Accuracy, and F-measure metrics. While all models demonstrated high accuracy rates (99%), this was largely due to the dataset's size, with 284,807 attributes and only 492 fraudulent transactions. Nevertheless, accuracy solely did not provide a comprehensive comparison metric. Support Vector Machine showed the highest recall (89.5), correctly identifying the most positive instances, highlighting its efficacy in detecting true positives. On the other hand, the Artificial Neural Network model exhibited the highest precision (79.4, indicating its capability to make accurate identifications, making it proficient in optimistic predictions.","PeriodicalId":509154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable AI in Credit Card Fraud Detection: Interpretable Models and Transparent Decision-making for Enhanced Trust and Compliance in the USA\",\"authors\":\"Md Rokibul Hasan, Sumon Gazi, N. Gurung\",\"doi\":\"10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credit Card Fraud presents significant challenges across various domains, comprising, healthcare, insurance, finance, and e-commerce.  The principal objective of this research was to examine the efficacy of Machine Learning techniques in detecting credit card fraud. Four key Machine Learning techniques were employed, notably, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network. Subsequently, model performance was evaluated using Precision, Recall, Accuracy, and F-measure metrics. While all models demonstrated high accuracy rates (99%), this was largely due to the dataset's size, with 284,807 attributes and only 492 fraudulent transactions. Nevertheless, accuracy solely did not provide a comprehensive comparison metric. Support Vector Machine showed the highest recall (89.5), correctly identifying the most positive instances, highlighting its efficacy in detecting true positives. On the other hand, the Artificial Neural Network model exhibited the highest precision (79.4, indicating its capability to make accurate identifications, making it proficient in optimistic predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信用卡欺诈给医疗保健、保险、金融和电子商务等各个领域带来了重大挑战。 本研究的主要目的是检验机器学习技术在检测信用卡欺诈方面的功效。研究采用了四种关键的机器学习技术,即支持向量机、逻辑回归、随机森林和人工神经网络。随后,使用精度、召回率、准确率和 F-measure 指标对模型性能进行了评估。虽然所有模型都表现出很高的准确率(99%),但这主要是由于数据集的规模较大,有 284 807 个属性,而欺诈交易只有 492 笔。不过,仅凭准确率并不能提供全面的比较指标。支持向量机显示了最高的召回率(89.5),正确识别了最多的正面实例,突出了其在检测真阳性方面的功效。另一方面,人工神经网络模型显示出最高的精确度(79.4),表明其具有准确识别的能力,因此在乐观预测方面表现出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explainable AI in Credit Card Fraud Detection: Interpretable Models and Transparent Decision-making for Enhanced Trust and Compliance in the USA
Credit Card Fraud presents significant challenges across various domains, comprising, healthcare, insurance, finance, and e-commerce.  The principal objective of this research was to examine the efficacy of Machine Learning techniques in detecting credit card fraud. Four key Machine Learning techniques were employed, notably, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network. Subsequently, model performance was evaluated using Precision, Recall, Accuracy, and F-measure metrics. While all models demonstrated high accuracy rates (99%), this was largely due to the dataset's size, with 284,807 attributes and only 492 fraudulent transactions. Nevertheless, accuracy solely did not provide a comprehensive comparison metric. Support Vector Machine showed the highest recall (89.5), correctly identifying the most positive instances, highlighting its efficacy in detecting true positives. On the other hand, the Artificial Neural Network model exhibited the highest precision (79.4, indicating its capability to make accurate identifications, making it proficient in optimistic predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信