S. Ahamad, S. M. Mohammad Azmin, M. S. Mat Nor, P.S. Abdullah, H.Y. Ch'ng
{"title":"利用统计设计实验评估西瓜(Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) )果皮提取率的干燥和提取参数","authors":"S. Ahamad, S. M. Mohammad Azmin, M. S. Mat Nor, P.S. Abdullah, H.Y. Ch'ng","doi":"10.26656/fr.2017.8(s2).61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Watermelon rind contributes about 30% of overall watermelon mass and is considered the\nmost underutilized resource as it is usually discarded as waste. Watermelon rind resources\nhave great potential economic value in various industries. Thus, utilizing the rind could\ndecrease the amount of biological waste in the environment. Therefore, this study aims to\ndetermine the optimal conditions in extracting oven and dehydrator drying watermelon\nrind using a sonicator extraction procedure. Watermelon rind samples were evaluated\nusing a one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) evaluation to identify the most significant factor for\nthe sonicator extraction time (0.5-3 hrs), ethanol concentration (20-100%), solvent-tosolid ratio (10:1-50:1 v/w), and sample drying time (24-48 hrs) parameters. The highest\nyield obtained for the oven drying sample was at one hr extraction time (15%), 100%\nethanol concentration (12.5%), 30:1 v/w ratio (12%), and 48 hrs drying (9%). Meanwhile,\nthe extraction yield of dehydrator drying sample was optimized at one hr of extraction\ntime with 10% yield 100% of ethanol concentration with 15.4% yield, 40:1 v/w of solvent\nratio with 14.7% yield, and 48 hrs of drying with 8% yield. The optimum extract yield of\ndehydrator drying sample could be further applied for cosmeceutical application as it\nproduced higher yield compared to oven drying sample.","PeriodicalId":12410,"journal":{"name":"Food Research","volume":"44 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of drying and extraction parameters for the extraction yield of\\nwatermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)) rind using statistical design experiment\",\"authors\":\"S. Ahamad, S. M. Mohammad Azmin, M. S. Mat Nor, P.S. Abdullah, H.Y. Ch'ng\",\"doi\":\"10.26656/fr.2017.8(s2).61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Watermelon rind contributes about 30% of overall watermelon mass and is considered the\\nmost underutilized resource as it is usually discarded as waste. Watermelon rind resources\\nhave great potential economic value in various industries. Thus, utilizing the rind could\\ndecrease the amount of biological waste in the environment. Therefore, this study aims to\\ndetermine the optimal conditions in extracting oven and dehydrator drying watermelon\\nrind using a sonicator extraction procedure. Watermelon rind samples were evaluated\\nusing a one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) evaluation to identify the most significant factor for\\nthe sonicator extraction time (0.5-3 hrs), ethanol concentration (20-100%), solvent-tosolid ratio (10:1-50:1 v/w), and sample drying time (24-48 hrs) parameters. The highest\\nyield obtained for the oven drying sample was at one hr extraction time (15%), 100%\\nethanol concentration (12.5%), 30:1 v/w ratio (12%), and 48 hrs drying (9%). Meanwhile,\\nthe extraction yield of dehydrator drying sample was optimized at one hr of extraction\\ntime with 10% yield 100% of ethanol concentration with 15.4% yield, 40:1 v/w of solvent\\nratio with 14.7% yield, and 48 hrs of drying with 8% yield. The optimum extract yield of\\ndehydrator drying sample could be further applied for cosmeceutical application as it\\nproduced higher yield compared to oven drying sample.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Research\",\"volume\":\"44 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(s2).61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(s2).61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of drying and extraction parameters for the extraction yield of
watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)) rind using statistical design experiment
Watermelon rind contributes about 30% of overall watermelon mass and is considered the
most underutilized resource as it is usually discarded as waste. Watermelon rind resources
have great potential economic value in various industries. Thus, utilizing the rind could
decrease the amount of biological waste in the environment. Therefore, this study aims to
determine the optimal conditions in extracting oven and dehydrator drying watermelon
rind using a sonicator extraction procedure. Watermelon rind samples were evaluated
using a one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) evaluation to identify the most significant factor for
the sonicator extraction time (0.5-3 hrs), ethanol concentration (20-100%), solvent-tosolid ratio (10:1-50:1 v/w), and sample drying time (24-48 hrs) parameters. The highest
yield obtained for the oven drying sample was at one hr extraction time (15%), 100%
ethanol concentration (12.5%), 30:1 v/w ratio (12%), and 48 hrs drying (9%). Meanwhile,
the extraction yield of dehydrator drying sample was optimized at one hr of extraction
time with 10% yield 100% of ethanol concentration with 15.4% yield, 40:1 v/w of solvent
ratio with 14.7% yield, and 48 hrs of drying with 8% yield. The optimum extract yield of
dehydrator drying sample could be further applied for cosmeceutical application as it
produced higher yield compared to oven drying sample.