白环征有助于区分胃底腺息肉和胃底腺型胃腺癌

Keitaro Takahashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Nobuhiro Ueno, Haruka Maguchi, S. Tachibana, Ryunosuke Hayashi, Yu Kobayashi, Yuya Sugiyama, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Shin Kashima, K. Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Kazumichi Harada, S. Yuzawa, Shin Ichihara, Toshikatsu Okumura, M. Fujiya
{"title":"白环征有助于区分胃底腺息肉和胃底腺型胃腺癌","authors":"Keitaro Takahashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Nobuhiro Ueno, Haruka Maguchi, S. Tachibana, Ryunosuke Hayashi, Yu Kobayashi, Yuya Sugiyama, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Shin Kashima, K. Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Kazumichi Harada, S. Yuzawa, Shin Ichihara, Toshikatsu Okumura, M. Fujiya","doi":"10.1055/a-2301-6248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (GA-FG) is characterized by an elevated lesion with vessel dilation exhibiting branching architectures (DVBA). However, this feature is also found in fundic gland polyp (FGP), posing a challenge in their differentiation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of gastric elevated lesions with DVBA and assess the efficacy of the white ring sign (WRS) as a novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG.\nMethods: We analyzed 159 gastric elevated lesions without DVBA and 51 gastric elevated lesions with DVBA, further dividing the latter into 39 in the positive-WRS group and 12 in the negative-WRS group. The clinicopathological features, diagnostic accuracy, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed.\nResults: Univariate and multivariate analyses for gastric elevated lesions with DVBA identified the histological type consistent with FGP and GA-FG, along with the presence of round pits in the background gastric mucosa, as independent predictors. FGPs were present in 92.3% (36/39) of the positive-WRS group and GA-FGs were observed in 50.0% (6/12) of the negative-WRS group. Positive- and negative-WRS exhibited high diagnostic accuracy, with 100% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 94.1% accuracy for FGP, and 100% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and 88.2% accuracy for GA-FG. Kappa values of WRS between experts and nonexperts were 0.891 and 0.841, respectively, indicating excellent agreement.\nConclusions: Positive- and negative-WRS demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability for FGP and GA-FG, respectively, suggesting that WRS is a useful novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG.","PeriodicalId":508938,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"42 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"White ring sign is useful for differentiating between fundic gland polyp and gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type\",\"authors\":\"Keitaro Takahashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Nobuhiro Ueno, Haruka Maguchi, S. Tachibana, Ryunosuke Hayashi, Yu Kobayashi, Yuya Sugiyama, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Shin Kashima, K. Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Kazumichi Harada, S. Yuzawa, Shin Ichihara, Toshikatsu Okumura, M. Fujiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2301-6248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (GA-FG) is characterized by an elevated lesion with vessel dilation exhibiting branching architectures (DVBA). However, this feature is also found in fundic gland polyp (FGP), posing a challenge in their differentiation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of gastric elevated lesions with DVBA and assess the efficacy of the white ring sign (WRS) as a novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG.\\nMethods: We analyzed 159 gastric elevated lesions without DVBA and 51 gastric elevated lesions with DVBA, further dividing the latter into 39 in the positive-WRS group and 12 in the negative-WRS group. The clinicopathological features, diagnostic accuracy, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed.\\nResults: Univariate and multivariate analyses for gastric elevated lesions with DVBA identified the histological type consistent with FGP and GA-FG, along with the presence of round pits in the background gastric mucosa, as independent predictors. FGPs were present in 92.3% (36/39) of the positive-WRS group and GA-FGs were observed in 50.0% (6/12) of the negative-WRS group. Positive- and negative-WRS exhibited high diagnostic accuracy, with 100% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 94.1% accuracy for FGP, and 100% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and 88.2% accuracy for GA-FG. Kappa values of WRS between experts and nonexperts were 0.891 and 0.841, respectively, indicating excellent agreement.\\nConclusions: Positive- and negative-WRS demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability for FGP and GA-FG, respectively, suggesting that WRS is a useful novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"42 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2301-6248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2301-6248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃底腺癌(GA-FG)的特征是病变隆起,血管扩张,呈现分支结构(DVBA)。然而,胃底腺息肉(FGP)也具有这一特征,这给它们的鉴别带来了挑战。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查具有 DVBA 的胃隆起病变的临床病理特征,并评估白环征(WRS)作为区分 FGP 和 GA-FG 的新型标记物的有效性:我们分析了159例无DVBA的胃隆起病变和51例有DVBA的胃隆起病变,并将后者进一步分为白环征阳性组39例和阴性组12例。对临床病理特征、诊断准确性和评分者间可靠性进行了分析:对伴有 DVBA 的胃隆起病变进行的单变量和多变量分析表明,与 FGP 和 GA-FG 一致的组织学类型以及背景胃黏膜中是否存在圆形凹坑是独立的预测因素。在 WRS 阳性组中,92.3%(36/39)存在 FGP,而在 WRS 阴性组中,50.0%(6/12)观察到 GA-FG。阳性和阴性 WRS 的诊断准确率都很高,对 FGP 的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 80.0%,准确率为 94.1%;对 GA-FG 的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 86.7%,准确率为 88.2%。专家和非专家之间的 WRS Kappa 值分别为 0.891 和 0.841,表明一致性极佳:结论:阳性和阴性 WRS 对 FGP 和 GA-FG 的诊断准确性和评定者之间的可靠性都很高,这表明 WRS 是区分 FGP 和 GA-FG 的一种有用的新型标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
White ring sign is useful for differentiating between fundic gland polyp and gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type
Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (GA-FG) is characterized by an elevated lesion with vessel dilation exhibiting branching architectures (DVBA). However, this feature is also found in fundic gland polyp (FGP), posing a challenge in their differentiation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of gastric elevated lesions with DVBA and assess the efficacy of the white ring sign (WRS) as a novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG. Methods: We analyzed 159 gastric elevated lesions without DVBA and 51 gastric elevated lesions with DVBA, further dividing the latter into 39 in the positive-WRS group and 12 in the negative-WRS group. The clinicopathological features, diagnostic accuracy, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses for gastric elevated lesions with DVBA identified the histological type consistent with FGP and GA-FG, along with the presence of round pits in the background gastric mucosa, as independent predictors. FGPs were present in 92.3% (36/39) of the positive-WRS group and GA-FGs were observed in 50.0% (6/12) of the negative-WRS group. Positive- and negative-WRS exhibited high diagnostic accuracy, with 100% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 94.1% accuracy for FGP, and 100% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and 88.2% accuracy for GA-FG. Kappa values of WRS between experts and nonexperts were 0.891 and 0.841, respectively, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusions: Positive- and negative-WRS demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability for FGP and GA-FG, respectively, suggesting that WRS is a useful novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信