利用数学编程框架进行资源开采评估,以优化地表-地下采矿选择和过渡

B. O. Afum
{"title":"利用数学编程框架进行资源开采评估,以优化地表-地下采矿选择和过渡","authors":"B. O. Afum","doi":"10.54026/jmms/1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mathematical programming framework based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model for surfaceunderground mining options and transition optimization for resource extraction is presented in this paper. Existing models are mainly based on a stepwise optimization approach with limited constraints which produces localized optimal solutions and are often impractical. For mineral deposits amenable to both surface and underground mining options, the MILP framework determines the most suitable mining option and associated schedule to exploit the orebody. The MILP formulation is tested and implemented on a gold deposit case study. The NPV of the optimal mining option ($ 2.515 billion) is sensitive to the gold price, ore quantity delivered from the underground mine, and delay factor associated in supporting the operational development and stopes. Positive changes in the delay factors associated with operational development support and mining stope support have more impact on the NPV than negative changes. However, the NPV is highly sensitive to the mining stope support delay than the operational development support delay","PeriodicalId":503317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mineral and Material Science (JMMS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource Extraction Evaluation Using a Mathematical Programming Framework for Surface-Underground Mining Options and Transitions Optimization\",\"authors\":\"B. O. Afum\",\"doi\":\"10.54026/jmms/1083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A mathematical programming framework based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model for surfaceunderground mining options and transition optimization for resource extraction is presented in this paper. Existing models are mainly based on a stepwise optimization approach with limited constraints which produces localized optimal solutions and are often impractical. For mineral deposits amenable to both surface and underground mining options, the MILP framework determines the most suitable mining option and associated schedule to exploit the orebody. The MILP formulation is tested and implemented on a gold deposit case study. The NPV of the optimal mining option ($ 2.515 billion) is sensitive to the gold price, ore quantity delivered from the underground mine, and delay factor associated in supporting the operational development and stopes. Positive changes in the delay factors associated with operational development support and mining stope support have more impact on the NPV than negative changes. However, the NPV is highly sensitive to the mining stope support delay than the operational development support delay\",\"PeriodicalId\":503317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mineral and Material Science (JMMS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mineral and Material Science (JMMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54026/jmms/1083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mineral and Material Science (JMMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54026/jmms/1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个基于混合整数线性规划(MILP)模型的数学编程框架,用于地表地下采矿方案和资源开采过渡优化。现有模型主要基于有限约束条件下的逐步优化方法,这种方法会产生局部最优解,往往不切实际。对于既可选择地面采矿,也可选择地下采矿的矿床,MILP 框架可确定最合适的采矿方案以及开采矿体的相关时间表。MILP 方案在金矿案例研究中得到了测试和实施。最佳采矿方案的净现值(25.15 亿美元)对金价、地下矿山的矿石交付量以及与支持运营开发和停产相关的延迟因素非常敏感。与业务开发支持和采矿斜坡支持相关的延迟因素的正向变化对净现值的影响大于负向变化。然而,净现值对采矿斜坡支护延迟的敏感度要高于对运营开发支护延迟的敏感度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resource Extraction Evaluation Using a Mathematical Programming Framework for Surface-Underground Mining Options and Transitions Optimization
A mathematical programming framework based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model for surfaceunderground mining options and transition optimization for resource extraction is presented in this paper. Existing models are mainly based on a stepwise optimization approach with limited constraints which produces localized optimal solutions and are often impractical. For mineral deposits amenable to both surface and underground mining options, the MILP framework determines the most suitable mining option and associated schedule to exploit the orebody. The MILP formulation is tested and implemented on a gold deposit case study. The NPV of the optimal mining option ($ 2.515 billion) is sensitive to the gold price, ore quantity delivered from the underground mine, and delay factor associated in supporting the operational development and stopes. Positive changes in the delay factors associated with operational development support and mining stope support have more impact on the NPV than negative changes. However, the NPV is highly sensitive to the mining stope support delay than the operational development support delay
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信