早期双语沉浸式教学对儿童认知能力的影响起伏不定

IF 0.7 Q3 LINGUISTICS
Barbu Cristina-Anca, Sophie Gillet, Martine Poncelet
{"title":"早期双语沉浸式教学对儿童认知能力的影响起伏不定","authors":"Barbu Cristina-Anca, Sophie Gillet, Martine Poncelet","doi":"10.1075/jicb.22020.cri","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cognitive benefits have been reported in early bilinguals as well as in children attending a Content and Language\n Integrated Learning (CLIL) school programme. Recent findings, however, show divergent results. These inconsistent findings seem to\n be attributable, among other factors, to the divergent tasks applied. This study aimed to determine whether a two-year CLIL\n programme has positive effects by applying the same tasks for which advantages were shown previously and to examine whether\n potential gains might impact children’s academic performance. Thirty 7-year-old French-speaking pupils who had been enrolled in a\n CLIL programme since the age of 5 and 30 French-speaking monolinguals following a traditional school programme were compared on\n different attentional and executive tasks after being matched on potential confounding variables. No attentional and executive\n differences were observed, but a significant effect was observed in favour of monolinguals on a task assessing mathematical\n skills. The implications of these results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44473,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluctuating cognitive benefits in children attending early bilingual immersive instruction\",\"authors\":\"Barbu Cristina-Anca, Sophie Gillet, Martine Poncelet\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jicb.22020.cri\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Cognitive benefits have been reported in early bilinguals as well as in children attending a Content and Language\\n Integrated Learning (CLIL) school programme. Recent findings, however, show divergent results. These inconsistent findings seem to\\n be attributable, among other factors, to the divergent tasks applied. This study aimed to determine whether a two-year CLIL\\n programme has positive effects by applying the same tasks for which advantages were shown previously and to examine whether\\n potential gains might impact children’s academic performance. Thirty 7-year-old French-speaking pupils who had been enrolled in a\\n CLIL programme since the age of 5 and 30 French-speaking monolinguals following a traditional school programme were compared on\\n different attentional and executive tasks after being matched on potential confounding variables. No attentional and executive\\n differences were observed, but a significant effect was observed in favour of monolinguals on a task assessing mathematical\\n skills. The implications of these results are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.22020.cri\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.22020.cri","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,早期双语学习以及参加内容与语言整合学习(CLIL)学校课程的儿童在认知方面都有益处。然而,最近的研究结果显示了不同的结果。除其他因素外,这些不一致的研究结果似乎可归因于所采用的不同任务。本研究旨在确定为期两年的 "内容与语言整合学习"(CLIL)课程是否会产生积极的影响,方法是采用与以前显示出优势的任务相同的任务,并研究潜在的收益是否会影响儿童的学业成绩。研究人员比较了 30 名从 5 岁起就参加 CLIL 课程的 7 岁法语学生和 30 名参加传统学校课程的法语单语学生在不同注意力和执行力任务上的表现,并就潜在的干扰变量进行了匹配。结果没有发现注意力和执行力方面的差异,但在一项评估数学技能的任务中,观察到了有利于单语学生的显著效果。本文讨论了这些结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluctuating cognitive benefits in children attending early bilingual immersive instruction
Cognitive benefits have been reported in early bilinguals as well as in children attending a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) school programme. Recent findings, however, show divergent results. These inconsistent findings seem to be attributable, among other factors, to the divergent tasks applied. This study aimed to determine whether a two-year CLIL programme has positive effects by applying the same tasks for which advantages were shown previously and to examine whether potential gains might impact children’s academic performance. Thirty 7-year-old French-speaking pupils who had been enrolled in a CLIL programme since the age of 5 and 30 French-speaking monolinguals following a traditional school programme were compared on different attentional and executive tasks after being matched on potential confounding variables. No attentional and executive differences were observed, but a significant effect was observed in favour of monolinguals on a task assessing mathematical skills. The implications of these results are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信