约旦和阿联酋法律中以电子监控替代剥夺自由的规定

{"title":"约旦和阿联酋法律中以电子监控替代剥夺自由的规定","authors":"","doi":"10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study delves into the legislative and practical landscapes governing\nelectronic monitoring within the legal frameworks of Jordan and the United Arab\nEmirates (UAE). It meticulously examines the similarities and disparities between\nthe legislative strategies employed by both nations, delineating how the UAE's\napproach encompasses a wider array of applications and more stringent penalties\nfor infringements, contrasting with Jordan's more discretionary stance, particularly\nemphasizing misdemeanor sentences. Despite these nuanced distinctions, both\njurisdictions confront hurdles in the efficacious implementation and regulation of\nelectronic surveillance. The study extends recommendations aimed at legislative\nenhancements and refinements in both countries to confront these challenges and\nbolster the efficacy of electronic monitoring systems.","PeriodicalId":516769,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Deprivation of Liberty in Jordanian and Emirati Law\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study delves into the legislative and practical landscapes governing\\nelectronic monitoring within the legal frameworks of Jordan and the United Arab\\nEmirates (UAE). It meticulously examines the similarities and disparities between\\nthe legislative strategies employed by both nations, delineating how the UAE's\\napproach encompasses a wider array of applications and more stringent penalties\\nfor infringements, contrasting with Jordan's more discretionary stance, particularly\\nemphasizing misdemeanor sentences. Despite these nuanced distinctions, both\\njurisdictions confront hurdles in the efficacious implementation and regulation of\\nelectronic surveillance. The study extends recommendations aimed at legislative\\nenhancements and refinements in both countries to confront these challenges and\\nbolster the efficacy of electronic monitoring systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究深入探讨了约旦和阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)法律框架内有关电子监控的立法和实践情况。研究细致研究了两国立法策略的异同,描述了阿联酋的方法如何涵盖更广泛的应用领域和更严厉的违法处罚,与之形成鲜明对比的是约旦的自由裁量立场,特别强调轻罪判决。尽管存在这些细微差别,但两个司法管辖区在有效实施和监管电子监控方面都面临着障碍。本研究提出了旨在加强和完善两国立法的建议,以应对这些挑战并提高电子监控系统的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Deprivation of Liberty in Jordanian and Emirati Law
The study delves into the legislative and practical landscapes governing electronic monitoring within the legal frameworks of Jordan and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It meticulously examines the similarities and disparities between the legislative strategies employed by both nations, delineating how the UAE's approach encompasses a wider array of applications and more stringent penalties for infringements, contrasting with Jordan's more discretionary stance, particularly emphasizing misdemeanor sentences. Despite these nuanced distinctions, both jurisdictions confront hurdles in the efficacious implementation and regulation of electronic surveillance. The study extends recommendations aimed at legislative enhancements and refinements in both countries to confront these challenges and bolster the efficacy of electronic monitoring systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信