在线课程质量评估工具:范围审查

Richard McInnes, James E Hobson, Kerry Lorette Johnson, Joshua Cramp, Claire Aitchison, K. Baldock
{"title":"在线课程质量评估工具:范围审查","authors":"Richard McInnes, James E Hobson, Kerry Lorette Johnson, Joshua Cramp, Claire Aitchison, K. Baldock","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do we make judgements about the quality of online courses? Checklists and rubrics are commonplace in Higher Education for establishing and measuring design features of online courses. They are created and used by institutions, academics, and educational designers to standardise measures for quality online course design. Despite an intensifying spotlight on quality learning and teaching in Higher Education, no large-scale review of course quality instruments has occurred. This scoping review aimed to ascertain the conceptions of quality being promoted by course quality evaluation instruments and the capability-building resources that underpin these instruments. \n  \nSeventy-five instruments used to measure quality in online course design in Higher Education were identified via a systematic search. These instruments were charted and coded. This paper reports on findings that summarise the key attributes of the course quality evaluation instruments, conceptualises a shared definition of course quality, and proposes specific core criteria for measuring course quality under the domains of learning design, assessment and evaluation, usability and accessibility, social interaction, and technology. This scoping review found a concerning underrepresentation of capability-building resources associated with course quality instruments and recommends the capability-building potential of these tools shifting them from compliance checkers to enable skills development.","PeriodicalId":502572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Course Quality Evaluation Instruments: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Richard McInnes, James E Hobson, Kerry Lorette Johnson, Joshua Cramp, Claire Aitchison, K. Baldock\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/ajet.8978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do we make judgements about the quality of online courses? Checklists and rubrics are commonplace in Higher Education for establishing and measuring design features of online courses. They are created and used by institutions, academics, and educational designers to standardise measures for quality online course design. Despite an intensifying spotlight on quality learning and teaching in Higher Education, no large-scale review of course quality instruments has occurred. This scoping review aimed to ascertain the conceptions of quality being promoted by course quality evaluation instruments and the capability-building resources that underpin these instruments. \\n  \\nSeventy-five instruments used to measure quality in online course design in Higher Education were identified via a systematic search. These instruments were charted and coded. This paper reports on findings that summarise the key attributes of the course quality evaluation instruments, conceptualises a shared definition of course quality, and proposes specific core criteria for measuring course quality under the domains of learning design, assessment and evaluation, usability and accessibility, social interaction, and technology. This scoping review found a concerning underrepresentation of capability-building resources associated with course quality instruments and recommends the capability-building potential of these tools shifting them from compliance checkers to enable skills development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们如何判断在线课程的质量?在高等教育中,建立和衡量在线课程设计特点的核对表和评分标准非常普遍。院校、学术界和教育设计者创建并使用它们,以规范在线课程设计质量的衡量标准。尽管高等教育中对学习和教学质量的关注不断加强,但还没有对课程质量工具进行过大规模的审查。本次范围审查旨在确定课程质量评估工具所倡导的质量概念,以及这些工具所依赖的能力建设资源。 通过系统性搜索,确定了 75 种用于衡量高等教育在线课程设计质量的工具。对这些工具进行了制图和编码。本文报告的研究结果总结了课程质量评估工具的关键属性,提出了课程质量的共同定义,并在学习设计、评估和评价、可用性和可及性、社会互动和技术等领域提出了衡量课程质量的具体核心标准。这次范围界定审查发现,与课程质量工具相关的能力建设资源不足,令人担忧,并建议发挥这些工具的能力建设潜力,将其从合规性检查工具转变为促进技能发展的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online Course Quality Evaluation Instruments: A Scoping Review
How do we make judgements about the quality of online courses? Checklists and rubrics are commonplace in Higher Education for establishing and measuring design features of online courses. They are created and used by institutions, academics, and educational designers to standardise measures for quality online course design. Despite an intensifying spotlight on quality learning and teaching in Higher Education, no large-scale review of course quality instruments has occurred. This scoping review aimed to ascertain the conceptions of quality being promoted by course quality evaluation instruments and the capability-building resources that underpin these instruments.   Seventy-five instruments used to measure quality in online course design in Higher Education were identified via a systematic search. These instruments were charted and coded. This paper reports on findings that summarise the key attributes of the course quality evaluation instruments, conceptualises a shared definition of course quality, and proposes specific core criteria for measuring course quality under the domains of learning design, assessment and evaluation, usability and accessibility, social interaction, and technology. This scoping review found a concerning underrepresentation of capability-building resources associated with course quality instruments and recommends the capability-building potential of these tools shifting them from compliance checkers to enable skills development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信