Ana Iglesias, Raquel Viciana, J. Pérez-Lorenzo, K. Ting, Alberto J. Tudela, Rebeca Marfil, Malak Qbilat, Antonio Hurtado, Antonio Jerez, J. P. Bandera
{"title":"城市信使养老院社交辅助机器人的用例设计与实施","authors":"Ana Iglesias, Raquel Viciana, J. Pérez-Lorenzo, K. Ting, Alberto J. Tudela, Rebeca Marfil, Malak Qbilat, Antonio Hurtado, Antonio Jerez, J. P. Bandera","doi":"10.3390/robotics13040061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of new assistive technologies in general, and Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) in particular, is becoming increasingly common for supporting people’s health and well-being. However, it still faces many issues regarding long-term adherence, acceptability and utility. Most of these issues are due to design processes that insufficiently take into account the needs, preferences and values of intended users. Other issues are related to the currently very limited amount of long-term evaluations, performed in real-world settings, for SARs. This study presents the results of two regional projects that consider as a starting hypothesis that the assessment in controlled environments and/or with short exposures may not be enough in the design of an SAR deployed in a retirement home and the necessity of designing for and with users. Thus, the proposed methodology has focused on use-cases definitions that follow a human-centred and participatory design approach. The main goals have been facilitating system acceptance and attachment by involving stakeholders in the robots design and evaluation, overcoming usage barriers and considering user’s needs integration. The implementation of the first use-case deployed and the two-phase pilot test performed in a retirement home are presented. In particular, a detailed description of the interface redesign process based on improving a basic prototype with users’ feedback and recommendations is presented, together with the main results of a formal evaluation that has highlighted the impact of changes and improvements addressed in the first redesign loop of the system.","PeriodicalId":506759,"journal":{"name":"Robotics","volume":"138 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Town Crier: A Use-Case Design and Implementation for a Socially Assistive Robot in Retirement Homes\",\"authors\":\"Ana Iglesias, Raquel Viciana, J. Pérez-Lorenzo, K. Ting, Alberto J. Tudela, Rebeca Marfil, Malak Qbilat, Antonio Hurtado, Antonio Jerez, J. P. Bandera\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/robotics13040061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of new assistive technologies in general, and Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) in particular, is becoming increasingly common for supporting people’s health and well-being. However, it still faces many issues regarding long-term adherence, acceptability and utility. Most of these issues are due to design processes that insufficiently take into account the needs, preferences and values of intended users. Other issues are related to the currently very limited amount of long-term evaluations, performed in real-world settings, for SARs. This study presents the results of two regional projects that consider as a starting hypothesis that the assessment in controlled environments and/or with short exposures may not be enough in the design of an SAR deployed in a retirement home and the necessity of designing for and with users. Thus, the proposed methodology has focused on use-cases definitions that follow a human-centred and participatory design approach. The main goals have been facilitating system acceptance and attachment by involving stakeholders in the robots design and evaluation, overcoming usage barriers and considering user’s needs integration. The implementation of the first use-case deployed and the two-phase pilot test performed in a retirement home are presented. In particular, a detailed description of the interface redesign process based on improving a basic prototype with users’ feedback and recommendations is presented, together with the main results of a formal evaluation that has highlighted the impact of changes and improvements addressed in the first redesign loop of the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Robotics\",\"volume\":\"138 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Robotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13040061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13040061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
新辅助技术,特别是社会辅助机器人(SAR)的使用越来越普遍,为人们的健康和福祉提供支持。然而,在长期使用、可接受性和实用性方面仍面临许多问题。这些问题大多是由于设计过程没有充分考虑到预期用户的需求、偏好和价值观造成的。其他问题则与目前在真实世界环境中对 SAR 进行的长期评估数量非常有限有关。本研究介绍了两个地区性项目的成果,这两个项目的出发假设是,在受控环境和/或短时间暴露下进行的评估可能不足以设计出部署在养老院的合成孔径雷达,而且有必要为用户并与用户一起进行设计。因此,建议的方法侧重于使用案例的定义,遵循以人为本和参与式的设计方法。主要目标是通过让利益相关者参与机器人的设计和评估、克服使用障碍和考虑用户的需求整合,促进系统的接受和附着。本报告介绍了第一个使用案例的实施情况,以及在一家养老院进行的两个阶段的试点测试。特别是,详细介绍了根据用户反馈和建议改进基本原型的界面重新设计过程,以及正式评估的主要结果,该评估强调了系统第一次重新设计循环中的更改和改进所产生的影响。
The Town Crier: A Use-Case Design and Implementation for a Socially Assistive Robot in Retirement Homes
The use of new assistive technologies in general, and Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) in particular, is becoming increasingly common for supporting people’s health and well-being. However, it still faces many issues regarding long-term adherence, acceptability and utility. Most of these issues are due to design processes that insufficiently take into account the needs, preferences and values of intended users. Other issues are related to the currently very limited amount of long-term evaluations, performed in real-world settings, for SARs. This study presents the results of two regional projects that consider as a starting hypothesis that the assessment in controlled environments and/or with short exposures may not be enough in the design of an SAR deployed in a retirement home and the necessity of designing for and with users. Thus, the proposed methodology has focused on use-cases definitions that follow a human-centred and participatory design approach. The main goals have been facilitating system acceptance and attachment by involving stakeholders in the robots design and evaluation, overcoming usage barriers and considering user’s needs integration. The implementation of the first use-case deployed and the two-phase pilot test performed in a retirement home are presented. In particular, a detailed description of the interface redesign process based on improving a basic prototype with users’ feedback and recommendations is presented, together with the main results of a formal evaluation that has highlighted the impact of changes and improvements addressed in the first redesign loop of the system.