双星尺度和弹性碰撞:几何类比

X. Prado, Angel Paredes Galan, Iván Area, Jose Manuel Domínguez Castiñeiras, Jorge Mira
{"title":"双星尺度和弹性碰撞:几何类比","authors":"X. Prado, Angel Paredes Galan, Iván Area, Jose Manuel Domínguez Castiñeiras, Jorge Mira","doi":"10.1088/1361-6404/ad3d42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Throughout history, scales have served as instrumental tools for quantifying the weight of objects, relying on a comparative assessment against a specified reference weight. Scales featuring uneven arms, such as the bismar scale, have proven particularly adept at gauging masses within a specific range relative to a predetermined reference mass. On the other hand, the kinematics of elastic collisions hinge on the inertial masses of the colliding entities. By observing the aftermath of a collision between a known reference mass and an object of unknown mass, one can deduce the latter’s mass. In this contribution, we highlight a fascinating and clear analogy between these two methodologies. We do so by adapting a geometric approach, initially applicable to the bismar scale, to both non-relativistic and relativistic elastic collisions, encompassing phenomena such as Compton scattering.","PeriodicalId":505733,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physics","volume":"661 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bismar scale and elastic collisions: a geometrical analogy\",\"authors\":\"X. Prado, Angel Paredes Galan, Iván Area, Jose Manuel Domínguez Castiñeiras, Jorge Mira\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6404/ad3d42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Throughout history, scales have served as instrumental tools for quantifying the weight of objects, relying on a comparative assessment against a specified reference weight. Scales featuring uneven arms, such as the bismar scale, have proven particularly adept at gauging masses within a specific range relative to a predetermined reference mass. On the other hand, the kinematics of elastic collisions hinge on the inertial masses of the colliding entities. By observing the aftermath of a collision between a known reference mass and an object of unknown mass, one can deduce the latter’s mass. In this contribution, we highlight a fascinating and clear analogy between these two methodologies. We do so by adapting a geometric approach, initially applicable to the bismar scale, to both non-relativistic and relativistic elastic collisions, encompassing phenomena such as Compton scattering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Physics\",\"volume\":\"661 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad3d42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad3d42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古往今来,天平一直是量化物体重量的工具,依靠的是与指定参考重量进行比较评估。事实证明,具有不平臂的天平(如俾斯麦天平)尤其擅长于测量相对于预定参考质量的特定范围内的质量。另一方面,弹性碰撞的运动学取决于碰撞实体的惯性质量。通过观察已知参考质量和未知质量物体之间碰撞的后果,可以推断出后者的质量。在这篇论文中,我们将重点介绍这两种方法之间迷人而清晰的类比。我们将最初适用于双星尺度的几何方法应用于非相对论和相对论弹性碰撞,包括康普顿散射等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The bismar scale and elastic collisions: a geometrical analogy
Throughout history, scales have served as instrumental tools for quantifying the weight of objects, relying on a comparative assessment against a specified reference weight. Scales featuring uneven arms, such as the bismar scale, have proven particularly adept at gauging masses within a specific range relative to a predetermined reference mass. On the other hand, the kinematics of elastic collisions hinge on the inertial masses of the colliding entities. By observing the aftermath of a collision between a known reference mass and an object of unknown mass, one can deduce the latter’s mass. In this contribution, we highlight a fascinating and clear analogy between these two methodologies. We do so by adapting a geometric approach, initially applicable to the bismar scale, to both non-relativistic and relativistic elastic collisions, encompassing phenomena such as Compton scattering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信