增强包容性:利用 ChatGPT 提高活体肾脏捐献信息的可读性

Oscar A. Garcia Valencia, C. Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, S. Suppadungsuk, P. Krisanapan, Iasmina M. Craici, Carrie Jadlowiec, Shennen A. Mao, M. Mao, Napat Leeaphorn, Pooja Budhiraja, W. Cheungpasitporn
{"title":"增强包容性:利用 ChatGPT 提高活体肾脏捐献信息的可读性","authors":"Oscar A. Garcia Valencia, C. Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, S. Suppadungsuk, P. Krisanapan, Iasmina M. Craici, Carrie Jadlowiec, Shennen A. Mao, M. Mao, Napat Leeaphorn, Pooja Budhiraja, W. Cheungpasitporn","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1366967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Addressing disparities in living kidney donation requires making information accessible across literacy levels, especially important given that the average American adult reads at an 8th-grade level. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model, in simplifying living kidney donation information to an 8th-grade reading level or below. Methods We used ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 to modify 27 questions and answers from Donate Life America, a key resource on living kidney donation. We measured the readability of both original and modified texts using the Flesch-Kincaid formula. A paired t-test was conducted to assess changes in readability levels, and a statistical comparison between the two ChatGPT versions was performed. Results Originally, the FAQs had an average reading level of 9.6 ± 1.9. Post-modification, ChatGPT 3.5 achieved an average readability level of 7.72 ± 1.85, while ChatGPT 4.0 reached 4.30 ± 1.71, both with a p-value <0.001 indicating significant reduction. ChatGPT 3.5 made 59.26% of answers readable below 8th-grade level, whereas ChatGPT 4.0 did so for 96.30% of the texts. The grade level range for modified answers was 3.4–11.3 for ChatGPT 3.5 and 1–8.1 for ChatGPT 4.0. Conclusion Both ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 effectively lowered the readability grade levels of complex medical information, with ChatGPT 4.0 being more effective. This suggests ChatGPT's potential role in promoting diversity and equity in living kidney donation, indicating scope for further refinement in making medical information more accessible.","PeriodicalId":504480,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Digital Health","volume":"2006 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering inclusivity: improving readability of living kidney donation information with ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Oscar A. Garcia Valencia, C. Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, S. Suppadungsuk, P. Krisanapan, Iasmina M. Craici, Carrie Jadlowiec, Shennen A. Mao, M. Mao, Napat Leeaphorn, Pooja Budhiraja, W. Cheungpasitporn\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1366967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Addressing disparities in living kidney donation requires making information accessible across literacy levels, especially important given that the average American adult reads at an 8th-grade level. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model, in simplifying living kidney donation information to an 8th-grade reading level or below. Methods We used ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 to modify 27 questions and answers from Donate Life America, a key resource on living kidney donation. We measured the readability of both original and modified texts using the Flesch-Kincaid formula. A paired t-test was conducted to assess changes in readability levels, and a statistical comparison between the two ChatGPT versions was performed. Results Originally, the FAQs had an average reading level of 9.6 ± 1.9. Post-modification, ChatGPT 3.5 achieved an average readability level of 7.72 ± 1.85, while ChatGPT 4.0 reached 4.30 ± 1.71, both with a p-value <0.001 indicating significant reduction. ChatGPT 3.5 made 59.26% of answers readable below 8th-grade level, whereas ChatGPT 4.0 did so for 96.30% of the texts. The grade level range for modified answers was 3.4–11.3 for ChatGPT 3.5 and 1–8.1 for ChatGPT 4.0. Conclusion Both ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 effectively lowered the readability grade levels of complex medical information, with ChatGPT 4.0 being more effective. This suggests ChatGPT's potential role in promoting diversity and equity in living kidney donation, indicating scope for further refinement in making medical information more accessible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Digital Health\",\"volume\":\"2006 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1366967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1366967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 要解决活体肾脏捐献中的不平等问题,就必须让不同文化水平的人都能获取信息,鉴于美国成年人的平均阅读水平仅为八年级,这一点尤为重要。本研究评估了高级人工智能语言模型 ChatGPT 在将活体肾脏捐献信息简化到八年级或以下阅读水平方面的效果。方法 我们使用 ChatGPT 3.5 和 4.0 版本修改了来自美国捐赠生命组织的 27 个问题和答案,这是有关活体肾脏捐赠的重要资源。我们使用 Flesch-Kincaid 公式测量了原始文本和修改后文本的可读性。我们采用配对 t 检验来评估可读性水平的变化,并对两个 ChatGPT 版本进行了统计比较。结果 最初,常见问题的平均阅读水平为 9.6 ± 1.9。修改后,ChatGPT 3.5 的平均可读性水平达到了 7.72 ± 1.85,而 ChatGPT 4.0 则达到了 4.30 ± 1.71,两者的 p 值均小于 0.001,表明可读性显著降低。ChatGPT 3.5 使 59.26% 的答案可读性低于八年级水平,而 ChatGPT 4.0 则使 96.30% 的文章可读性低于八年级水平。ChatGPT 3.5 和 ChatGPT 4.0 修改后答案的年级范围分别为 3.4-11.3 年级和 1-8.1 年级。结论 ChatGPT 3.5 和 4.0 都有效地降低了复杂医学信息的可读性等级,其中 ChatGPT 4.0 的效果更好。这表明 ChatGPT 在促进活体肾脏捐献的多样性和公平性方面具有潜在作用,同时也表明在使医疗信息更易于获取方面还有进一步改进的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empowering inclusivity: improving readability of living kidney donation information with ChatGPT
Background Addressing disparities in living kidney donation requires making information accessible across literacy levels, especially important given that the average American adult reads at an 8th-grade level. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model, in simplifying living kidney donation information to an 8th-grade reading level or below. Methods We used ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 to modify 27 questions and answers from Donate Life America, a key resource on living kidney donation. We measured the readability of both original and modified texts using the Flesch-Kincaid formula. A paired t-test was conducted to assess changes in readability levels, and a statistical comparison between the two ChatGPT versions was performed. Results Originally, the FAQs had an average reading level of 9.6 ± 1.9. Post-modification, ChatGPT 3.5 achieved an average readability level of 7.72 ± 1.85, while ChatGPT 4.0 reached 4.30 ± 1.71, both with a p-value <0.001 indicating significant reduction. ChatGPT 3.5 made 59.26% of answers readable below 8th-grade level, whereas ChatGPT 4.0 did so for 96.30% of the texts. The grade level range for modified answers was 3.4–11.3 for ChatGPT 3.5 and 1–8.1 for ChatGPT 4.0. Conclusion Both ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 effectively lowered the readability grade levels of complex medical information, with ChatGPT 4.0 being more effective. This suggests ChatGPT's potential role in promoting diversity and equity in living kidney donation, indicating scope for further refinement in making medical information more accessible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信