人工智能定价:人工智能的采用与合谋定价

Jiaqi Liu
{"title":"人工智能定价:人工智能的采用与合谋定价","authors":"Jiaqi Liu","doi":"10.62051/ed63gf48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in determining pricing strategies, there is an increasing concern about its potential to foster collusive behavior. Harrington (2012, 2018) underscores the challenge: if AI proves more adept at tacit collusion than humans or if AI-driven collusion is inherently tacit, then it presents a significant hurdle for prosecution under the prevailing interpretation of US antitrust laws. Validating these concerns, Assad et al. (2020) observed collusive price surges linked to the adoption of pricing algorithms among German gas stations. Drawing from game theory—specifically the repeated game paradigm—this paper crafts a foundational mathematical model to analyze competition versus collusion dynamics. It also evaluates the resultant welfare implications of both scenarios. The paper further delves into the broader challenges posed by AI-powered pricing and advocates for potential policy countermeasures, including algorithmic regulation and collusion detection mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":509968,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI Pricing: Adoption of Artificial Intelligences and Collusive Price\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.62051/ed63gf48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in determining pricing strategies, there is an increasing concern about its potential to foster collusive behavior. Harrington (2012, 2018) underscores the challenge: if AI proves more adept at tacit collusion than humans or if AI-driven collusion is inherently tacit, then it presents a significant hurdle for prosecution under the prevailing interpretation of US antitrust laws. Validating these concerns, Assad et al. (2020) observed collusive price surges linked to the adoption of pricing algorithms among German gas stations. Drawing from game theory—specifically the repeated game paradigm—this paper crafts a foundational mathematical model to analyze competition versus collusion dynamics. It also evaluates the resultant welfare implications of both scenarios. The paper further delves into the broader challenges posed by AI-powered pricing and advocates for potential policy countermeasures, including algorithmic regulation and collusion detection mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62051/ed63gf48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62051/ed63gf48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于定价策略的制定,人们越来越担心人工智能会助长合谋行为。Harrington(2012,2018)强调了这一挑战:如果人工智能被证明比人类更善于默契合谋,或者人工智能驱动的合谋本质上是默契的,那么根据美国反托拉斯法的现行解释,这将成为起诉的重大障碍。Assad 等人(2020 年)观察到德国加油站在采用定价算法时出现了串通涨价现象,验证了上述担忧。本文借鉴博弈论,特别是重复博弈范式,建立了一个基础数学模型,用于分析竞争与合谋的动态关系。本文还评估了这两种情况对福利的影响。本文进一步探讨了人工智能定价带来的更广泛挑战,并提出了潜在的政策对策,包括算法监管和合谋检测机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI Pricing: Adoption of Artificial Intelligences and Collusive Price
With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in determining pricing strategies, there is an increasing concern about its potential to foster collusive behavior. Harrington (2012, 2018) underscores the challenge: if AI proves more adept at tacit collusion than humans or if AI-driven collusion is inherently tacit, then it presents a significant hurdle for prosecution under the prevailing interpretation of US antitrust laws. Validating these concerns, Assad et al. (2020) observed collusive price surges linked to the adoption of pricing algorithms among German gas stations. Drawing from game theory—specifically the repeated game paradigm—this paper crafts a foundational mathematical model to analyze competition versus collusion dynamics. It also evaluates the resultant welfare implications of both scenarios. The paper further delves into the broader challenges posed by AI-powered pricing and advocates for potential policy countermeasures, including algorithmic regulation and collusion detection mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信