{"title":"无法生存的概念:弗朗茨-法农的《北非综合症》(1952 年)解读","authors":"Sujaya Dhanvantari","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a close reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952), this article draws out Fanon's understanding of “death in life” to suggest that a concept of unlivability in the present must account for the temporal duration of racialized and colonized experiences of pain and trauma. It is thus critical of Judith Butler's and Frédéric Worms's discussion of unlivability in The Livable and The Unlivable (2023) for not centering a phenomenological study of the testimonies of the oppressed. I argue for a greater engagement with Fanon on the longue durée of racial and colonial violence enacted on the bodies, psyches, and histories of racialized and colonized peoples. This article concludes by pointing to possibilities for a shared unlivability in a shared temporality, with potential to move beyond refusal and toward resistance to the colonial control over time.","PeriodicalId":514583,"journal":{"name":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The concept of unlivability: A reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952)\",\"authors\":\"Sujaya Dhanvantari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjp.12554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From a close reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952), this article draws out Fanon's understanding of “death in life” to suggest that a concept of unlivability in the present must account for the temporal duration of racialized and colonized experiences of pain and trauma. It is thus critical of Judith Butler's and Frédéric Worms's discussion of unlivability in The Livable and The Unlivable (2023) for not centering a phenomenological study of the testimonies of the oppressed. I argue for a greater engagement with Fanon on the longue durée of racial and colonial violence enacted on the bodies, psyches, and histories of racialized and colonized peoples. This article concludes by pointing to possibilities for a shared unlivability in a shared temporality, with potential to move beyond refusal and toward resistance to the colonial control over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"174 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文通过对弗朗茨-法农的《北非综合症》(1952 年)的细读,引出法农对 "生中之死 "的理解,提出当下的不可居住性概念必须解释种族化和殖民化的痛苦和创伤经历的时间长度。因此,朱迪斯-巴特勒(Judith Butler)和弗雷德里克-沃姆斯(Frédéric Worms)在《可生存与不可生存》(The Livable and The Unlivable)(2023 年)中对不可生存性的讨论并没有以对被压迫者证词的现象学研究为中心,这一点是值得批评的。我主张更多地与法农合作,探讨种族和殖民暴力对种族化和殖民化人民的身体、心理和历史造成的长期影响。本文最后指出,在共同的时间性中存在着共同的不可能性,有可能超越拒绝,走向抵抗殖民主义对时间的控制。
The concept of unlivability: A reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952)
From a close reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952), this article draws out Fanon's understanding of “death in life” to suggest that a concept of unlivability in the present must account for the temporal duration of racialized and colonized experiences of pain and trauma. It is thus critical of Judith Butler's and Frédéric Worms's discussion of unlivability in The Livable and The Unlivable (2023) for not centering a phenomenological study of the testimonies of the oppressed. I argue for a greater engagement with Fanon on the longue durée of racial and colonial violence enacted on the bodies, psyches, and histories of racialized and colonized peoples. This article concludes by pointing to possibilities for a shared unlivability in a shared temporality, with potential to move beyond refusal and toward resistance to the colonial control over time.