B. Defraia, M. Focardi, Simone Grassi, Giulia Chiavacci, Simone Faccioli, G. Federico Romano, I. Bianchi, Vilma Pinchi, Alessandro Innocenti
{"title":"眼睑整形术和甲状腺疾病的不良后果:是否一定需要赔偿?病例报告与文献综述。","authors":"B. Defraia, M. Focardi, Simone Grassi, Giulia Chiavacci, Simone Faccioli, G. Federico Romano, I. Bianchi, Vilma Pinchi, Alessandro Innocenti","doi":"10.3390/diseases12040075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPlastic surgery is one of the medical specialties with the highest risk of recurrent medical malpractice claims. The frequency of civil lawsuits represents an issue for the micro- and macro-economy of practitioners of these health treatments. This paper aims to discuss the medico-legal aspects and claim path in a case of a cosmetic blepharoplasty complicated by lagophthalmos wrongly related to the procedure but due to missed hyperthyroidism.\n\n\nCASE DESCRIPTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW\nA 48-year-old woman who underwent cosmetic blepharoplasty with undiagnosed hyperthyroidism claimed that the lagophthalmos that occurred some months after the procedure was due to medical malpractice, due to an over-resection of the exuberant lower eyelid tissue. The review question was, \"Are thyroid disfunctions usually considered contraindications to be communicated to patients who undergo blepharoplasty?\", and the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were used.\n\n\nRESULTS AND DISCUSSION\nThere were 21 eligible papers. The case highlights the importance and complexity of causal inference (such as unknown thyroid dysfunctions), related informed consent involving information on possible complications unrelated to malpractice, and guidelines recommending endocrinological consultation for cosmetic/functional blepharoplasty in patients at risk (e.g., female patients with a known history of thyroid disease).","PeriodicalId":11200,"journal":{"name":"Diseases","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative Outcomes of Blepharoplasty and Thyroid Disorders: Is Compensation Always Due? A Case Report with a Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"B. Defraia, M. Focardi, Simone Grassi, Giulia Chiavacci, Simone Faccioli, G. Federico Romano, I. Bianchi, Vilma Pinchi, Alessandro Innocenti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases12040075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nPlastic surgery is one of the medical specialties with the highest risk of recurrent medical malpractice claims. The frequency of civil lawsuits represents an issue for the micro- and macro-economy of practitioners of these health treatments. This paper aims to discuss the medico-legal aspects and claim path in a case of a cosmetic blepharoplasty complicated by lagophthalmos wrongly related to the procedure but due to missed hyperthyroidism.\\n\\n\\nCASE DESCRIPTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW\\nA 48-year-old woman who underwent cosmetic blepharoplasty with undiagnosed hyperthyroidism claimed that the lagophthalmos that occurred some months after the procedure was due to medical malpractice, due to an over-resection of the exuberant lower eyelid tissue. The review question was, \\\"Are thyroid disfunctions usually considered contraindications to be communicated to patients who undergo blepharoplasty?\\\", and the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were used.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS AND DISCUSSION\\nThere were 21 eligible papers. The case highlights the importance and complexity of causal inference (such as unknown thyroid dysfunctions), related informed consent involving information on possible complications unrelated to malpractice, and guidelines recommending endocrinological consultation for cosmetic/functional blepharoplasty in patients at risk (e.g., female patients with a known history of thyroid disease).\",\"PeriodicalId\":11200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12040075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12040075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景整形外科是反复发生医疗事故索赔风险最高的医学专科之一。民事诉讼的频繁发生对这些医疗机构的微观和宏观经济都是一个问题。本文旨在讨论一例眼睑整容术并发眼睑下垂的医疗法律问题和索赔途径,眼睑下垂错误地与眼睑整容术有关,但却是由于漏诊甲状腺机能亢进症引起的。综述的问题是:"甲状腺功能紊乱是否通常被认为是眼睑成形术患者的禁忌症?",使用的数据库包括MEDLINE via PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Ovid、ISI Web of Science、Cochrane和Google Scholar。该病例强调了因果推断(如未知的甲状腺功能障碍)的重要性和复杂性,相关知情同意书涉及与不当行为无关的可能并发症的信息,以及建议对高危患者(如已知有甲状腺疾病史的女性患者)进行美容/功能性眼睑成形术的内分泌咨询指南。
Negative Outcomes of Blepharoplasty and Thyroid Disorders: Is Compensation Always Due? A Case Report with a Literature Review.
BACKGROUND
Plastic surgery is one of the medical specialties with the highest risk of recurrent medical malpractice claims. The frequency of civil lawsuits represents an issue for the micro- and macro-economy of practitioners of these health treatments. This paper aims to discuss the medico-legal aspects and claim path in a case of a cosmetic blepharoplasty complicated by lagophthalmos wrongly related to the procedure but due to missed hyperthyroidism.
CASE DESCRIPTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
A 48-year-old woman who underwent cosmetic blepharoplasty with undiagnosed hyperthyroidism claimed that the lagophthalmos that occurred some months after the procedure was due to medical malpractice, due to an over-resection of the exuberant lower eyelid tissue. The review question was, "Are thyroid disfunctions usually considered contraindications to be communicated to patients who undergo blepharoplasty?", and the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were used.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There were 21 eligible papers. The case highlights the importance and complexity of causal inference (such as unknown thyroid dysfunctions), related informed consent involving information on possible complications unrelated to malpractice, and guidelines recommending endocrinological consultation for cosmetic/functional blepharoplasty in patients at risk (e.g., female patients with a known history of thyroid disease).