B. Yenew, P. de Haas, Yohannes Babo, G. Diriba, Bihil Sherefdin, A. Bedru, B. Tegegn, T. Gudina, Tadesse Getahun, Saro Abdella, D. Jerene, Eveline Klinkenberg, E. Tiemersma
{"title":"儿童结核病粪便检测的诊断准确性、可行性和可接受性","authors":"B. Yenew, P. de Haas, Yohannes Babo, G. Diriba, Bihil Sherefdin, A. Bedru, B. Tegegn, T. Gudina, Tadesse Getahun, Saro Abdella, D. Jerene, Eveline Klinkenberg, E. Tiemersma","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00710-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Childhood tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains challenging, partly because children cannot provide sputum. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Simple One-Step (SOS) stool method with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) for childhood TB compared to culture and Xpert-Ultra on a respiratory sample (RS) and clinical diagnosis. It also assessed the feasibility and acceptability of stool testing according to laboratory staff, and caregivers’ sample preference.We enrolled children (≤10 years) with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis in Ethiopia. RS was tested with Xpert-Ultra and culture; stool samples were tested using the SOS stool method with Xpert-Ultra. Laboratory staff and caregivers’ opinions were assessed using standardized questionnaires.Of 898 children enrolled, 792, 832 and 794 were included for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra against culture, RS Xpert-Ultra, and clinical diagnosis, respectively, yielding sensitivity estimates for SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra of 69.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 56.0–79.7%), 76.8% (95% CI, 64.2–85.9%), and 59.0% (95% CI, 47.9–69.2%), respectively. The specificity was ≥98.8% for all comparisons. The rate of non-determinate test results was 2.8% after one repeat test. According to laboratory staff, stool collection was feasible, acceptable and the SOS stool method was easy to perform. Most caregivers (75%) preferred stool for TB diagnosis over RS.This study shows that SOS stool Xpert-Ultra testing offers a good alternative to RS testing for TB in children who cannot spontaneously produce a sputum sample and would otherwise need to undergo invasive procedures to obtain RS for diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":504874,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"17 15‐16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and acceptability of stool-based testing for childhood tuberculosis\",\"authors\":\"B. Yenew, P. de Haas, Yohannes Babo, G. Diriba, Bihil Sherefdin, A. Bedru, B. Tegegn, T. Gudina, Tadesse Getahun, Saro Abdella, D. Jerene, Eveline Klinkenberg, E. Tiemersma\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00710-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Childhood tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains challenging, partly because children cannot provide sputum. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Simple One-Step (SOS) stool method with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) for childhood TB compared to culture and Xpert-Ultra on a respiratory sample (RS) and clinical diagnosis. It also assessed the feasibility and acceptability of stool testing according to laboratory staff, and caregivers’ sample preference.We enrolled children (≤10 years) with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis in Ethiopia. RS was tested with Xpert-Ultra and culture; stool samples were tested using the SOS stool method with Xpert-Ultra. Laboratory staff and caregivers’ opinions were assessed using standardized questionnaires.Of 898 children enrolled, 792, 832 and 794 were included for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra against culture, RS Xpert-Ultra, and clinical diagnosis, respectively, yielding sensitivity estimates for SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra of 69.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 56.0–79.7%), 76.8% (95% CI, 64.2–85.9%), and 59.0% (95% CI, 47.9–69.2%), respectively. The specificity was ≥98.8% for all comparisons. The rate of non-determinate test results was 2.8% after one repeat test. According to laboratory staff, stool collection was feasible, acceptable and the SOS stool method was easy to perform. Most caregivers (75%) preferred stool for TB diagnosis over RS.This study shows that SOS stool Xpert-Ultra testing offers a good alternative to RS testing for TB in children who cannot spontaneously produce a sputum sample and would otherwise need to undergo invasive procedures to obtain RS for diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"17 15‐16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00710-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00710-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and acceptability of stool-based testing for childhood tuberculosis
Childhood tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains challenging, partly because children cannot provide sputum. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Simple One-Step (SOS) stool method with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) for childhood TB compared to culture and Xpert-Ultra on a respiratory sample (RS) and clinical diagnosis. It also assessed the feasibility and acceptability of stool testing according to laboratory staff, and caregivers’ sample preference.We enrolled children (≤10 years) with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis in Ethiopia. RS was tested with Xpert-Ultra and culture; stool samples were tested using the SOS stool method with Xpert-Ultra. Laboratory staff and caregivers’ opinions were assessed using standardized questionnaires.Of 898 children enrolled, 792, 832 and 794 were included for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra against culture, RS Xpert-Ultra, and clinical diagnosis, respectively, yielding sensitivity estimates for SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra of 69.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 56.0–79.7%), 76.8% (95% CI, 64.2–85.9%), and 59.0% (95% CI, 47.9–69.2%), respectively. The specificity was ≥98.8% for all comparisons. The rate of non-determinate test results was 2.8% after one repeat test. According to laboratory staff, stool collection was feasible, acceptable and the SOS stool method was easy to perform. Most caregivers (75%) preferred stool for TB diagnosis over RS.This study shows that SOS stool Xpert-Ultra testing offers a good alternative to RS testing for TB in children who cannot spontaneously produce a sputum sample and would otherwise need to undergo invasive procedures to obtain RS for diagnosis.