袖带胃切除术和胃旁路术作为再手术在抗糖尿病报销方面的成本效益:全国队列研究

J. Théreaux, Mohammed Bennani, J. Khemis, Elisabeth Ohayon, I. Visnovec Buissez, Alexandre Lafourcade, L. Quiriconi, Caroline Philippe, J. Oppert
{"title":"袖带胃切除术和胃旁路术作为再手术在抗糖尿病报销方面的成本效益:全国队列研究","authors":"J. Théreaux, Mohammed Bennani, J. Khemis, Elisabeth Ohayon, I. Visnovec Buissez, Alexandre Lafourcade, L. Quiriconi, Caroline Philippe, J. Oppert","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This study compared the effectiveness of 4 main revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) sequences after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB), on the reimbursement of antidiabetic treatments in France.\n \n \n \n Few large-scale prospective cohort studies have assessed the changes in antidiabetic treatments after RBS.\n \n \n \n This nationwide observational population-based cohort study analyzed data from the French National Health Insurance Database. All patients who underwent primary SG and AGB in France between January 2012 and December 2014 were included and followed up until December 31, 2020. The changes in categories and costs of reimbursed antidiabetic treatments across different RBS sequences were assessed (presented as follows: bariatric surgery (BS)-RBS).\n \n \n \n Among the 107,088 patients who underwent BS, 6396 underwent RBS, 2400 SG-GBP (SG converted to gastric bypass [GBP] during follow-up), 2277 AGB-SG, 1173 AGB-GBP, and 546 SG-SG. Pre-RBS insulin was used in 10 (2.9%), 4 (0.9%), 8 (2.4%), and 10 (2.6%) patients, respectively. Two years after RBS, the treatment discontinuation or decrease (the change of treatment to a lighter one category rates [eg, insulin to bi/tritherapy]) was 47%, 47%, 49%, and 34%, respectively. Four years after RBS, the median annual cost per patient compared with baseline was lower (P < 0.01) for all sequences, except SG-SG (P = 0.24). The most notable effect concerned AGB-GBP (median of more than 220 euros to 0).\n \n \n \n This study demonstrated the positive impact of RBS over a 4-year follow-up period on antidiabetic treatments reimbursement, through the reduction or discontinuation of treatments and a significant decrease in costs per patient.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery on Antidiabetic Reimbursement: A Nationwide Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"J. Théreaux, Mohammed Bennani, J. Khemis, Elisabeth Ohayon, I. Visnovec Buissez, Alexandre Lafourcade, L. Quiriconi, Caroline Philippe, J. Oppert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/as9.0000000000000420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This study compared the effectiveness of 4 main revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) sequences after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB), on the reimbursement of antidiabetic treatments in France.\\n \\n \\n \\n Few large-scale prospective cohort studies have assessed the changes in antidiabetic treatments after RBS.\\n \\n \\n \\n This nationwide observational population-based cohort study analyzed data from the French National Health Insurance Database. All patients who underwent primary SG and AGB in France between January 2012 and December 2014 were included and followed up until December 31, 2020. The changes in categories and costs of reimbursed antidiabetic treatments across different RBS sequences were assessed (presented as follows: bariatric surgery (BS)-RBS).\\n \\n \\n \\n Among the 107,088 patients who underwent BS, 6396 underwent RBS, 2400 SG-GBP (SG converted to gastric bypass [GBP] during follow-up), 2277 AGB-SG, 1173 AGB-GBP, and 546 SG-SG. Pre-RBS insulin was used in 10 (2.9%), 4 (0.9%), 8 (2.4%), and 10 (2.6%) patients, respectively. Two years after RBS, the treatment discontinuation or decrease (the change of treatment to a lighter one category rates [eg, insulin to bi/tritherapy]) was 47%, 47%, 49%, and 34%, respectively. Four years after RBS, the median annual cost per patient compared with baseline was lower (P < 0.01) for all sequences, except SG-SG (P = 0.24). The most notable effect concerned AGB-GBP (median of more than 220 euros to 0).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study demonstrated the positive impact of RBS over a 4-year follow-up period on antidiabetic treatments reimbursement, through the reduction or discontinuation of treatments and a significant decrease in costs per patient.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究比较了袖带胃切除术(SG)和可调节胃束带术(AGB)后的 4 种主要减肥手术(RBS)顺序对法国抗糖尿病治疗报销的影响。 很少有大规模的前瞻性队列研究对 RBS 后抗糖尿病治疗的变化进行评估。 这项基于人群的全国性观察性队列研究分析了法国国家医疗保险数据库中的数据。研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间在法国接受初级 SG 和 AGB 治疗的所有患者,并对其进行了随访,直至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。研究评估了不同减重手术序列中可报销的抗糖尿病治疗类别和费用的变化情况(如下所示:减重手术(BS)-减重手术)。 在接受 BS 的 107,088 名患者中,有 6396 人接受了 RBS,2400 人接受了 SG-GBP(随访期间 SG 转为胃旁路手术 [GBP]),2277 人接受了 AGB-SG,1173 人接受了 AGB-GBP,546 人接受了 SG-SG。RBS前使用胰岛素的患者分别为10人(2.9%)、4人(0.9%)、8人(2.4%)和10人(2.6%)。RBS 两年后,停止治疗或减少治疗(将治疗改为较轻的一类比率[如将胰岛素改为双药/胰岛素治疗])的比例分别为 47%、47%、49% 和 34%。RBS 治疗四年后,与基线相比,除 SG-SG (P = 0.24)外,所有序列中每位患者的年度费用中位数均有所降低(P < 0.01)。效果最显著的是 AGB-GBP(中位数从 220 多欧元降至 0)。 这项研究表明,在 4 年的随访期内,RBS 通过减少或停止治疗以及显著降低每位患者的费用,对糖尿病治疗费用的报销产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery on Antidiabetic Reimbursement: A Nationwide Cohort Study
This study compared the effectiveness of 4 main revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) sequences after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB), on the reimbursement of antidiabetic treatments in France. Few large-scale prospective cohort studies have assessed the changes in antidiabetic treatments after RBS. This nationwide observational population-based cohort study analyzed data from the French National Health Insurance Database. All patients who underwent primary SG and AGB in France between January 2012 and December 2014 were included and followed up until December 31, 2020. The changes in categories and costs of reimbursed antidiabetic treatments across different RBS sequences were assessed (presented as follows: bariatric surgery (BS)-RBS). Among the 107,088 patients who underwent BS, 6396 underwent RBS, 2400 SG-GBP (SG converted to gastric bypass [GBP] during follow-up), 2277 AGB-SG, 1173 AGB-GBP, and 546 SG-SG. Pre-RBS insulin was used in 10 (2.9%), 4 (0.9%), 8 (2.4%), and 10 (2.6%) patients, respectively. Two years after RBS, the treatment discontinuation or decrease (the change of treatment to a lighter one category rates [eg, insulin to bi/tritherapy]) was 47%, 47%, 49%, and 34%, respectively. Four years after RBS, the median annual cost per patient compared with baseline was lower (P < 0.01) for all sequences, except SG-SG (P = 0.24). The most notable effect concerned AGB-GBP (median of more than 220 euros to 0). This study demonstrated the positive impact of RBS over a 4-year follow-up period on antidiabetic treatments reimbursement, through the reduction or discontinuation of treatments and a significant decrease in costs per patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信