Jennifer A Lawlor, Jini E. Puma, Jamie Powers, Marlayna Martinez, Danielle Varda, J. Leiferman
{"title":"了解解决童年不良经历的农村社会网络:圣路易斯谷案例研究。","authors":"Jennifer A Lawlor, Jini E. Puma, Jamie Powers, Marlayna Martinez, Danielle Varda, J. Leiferman","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe purpose of this study is to assess a cross-sector, interorganizational network addressing adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in a rural Colorado community. We characterize the organizations in the network, assess their awareness of ACEs, and evaluate how they participate in the network. We also assess the network health.\n\n\nMETHOD\nEmploying a social network analysis approach, we collected survey data from 45 organizations that support young children and their families, including nonprofits, health care clinics, and early childhood education centers, among others.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOn average, nonprofit organizations had relationships with a greater percentage of network members than other types of organizations. Network members engaged in relationships focused on a wide range of activities (e.g., client assessments, sharing information, providing services), with some organizational types leading the network in certain activities. Scores across all dimensions of trust and value were above 3 (range: 2.1-3.8), which is advantageous for a network and network relationships existed across a range of relational intensities (from awareness to organizational integration).\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nNonprofit organizations that reported high levels of connectedness in the network were able to effectively mobilize the ACEs network. Health clinics participated in a greater share of relationships involving assessment, service provision, and tool sharing than other types of organizations. As such, health care clinics may serve as leaders in directly serving children and families experiencing ACEs in rural communities. The rural context may also explain high levels of trust and value, which can serve as assets for future network development and mobilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":358476,"journal":{"name":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding rural social networks addressing adverse childhood experiences: A case study of the San Luis Valley.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A Lawlor, Jini E. Puma, Jamie Powers, Marlayna Martinez, Danielle Varda, J. Leiferman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nThe purpose of this study is to assess a cross-sector, interorganizational network addressing adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in a rural Colorado community. We characterize the organizations in the network, assess their awareness of ACEs, and evaluate how they participate in the network. We also assess the network health.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nEmploying a social network analysis approach, we collected survey data from 45 organizations that support young children and their families, including nonprofits, health care clinics, and early childhood education centers, among others.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOn average, nonprofit organizations had relationships with a greater percentage of network members than other types of organizations. Network members engaged in relationships focused on a wide range of activities (e.g., client assessments, sharing information, providing services), with some organizational types leading the network in certain activities. Scores across all dimensions of trust and value were above 3 (range: 2.1-3.8), which is advantageous for a network and network relationships existed across a range of relational intensities (from awareness to organizational integration).\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nNonprofit organizations that reported high levels of connectedness in the network were able to effectively mobilize the ACEs network. Health clinics participated in a greater share of relationships involving assessment, service provision, and tool sharing than other types of organizations. As such, health care clinics may serve as leaders in directly serving children and families experiencing ACEs in rural communities. The rural context may also explain high levels of trust and value, which can serve as assets for future network development and mobilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":358476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding rural social networks addressing adverse childhood experiences: A case study of the San Luis Valley.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study is to assess a cross-sector, interorganizational network addressing adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in a rural Colorado community. We characterize the organizations in the network, assess their awareness of ACEs, and evaluate how they participate in the network. We also assess the network health.
METHOD
Employing a social network analysis approach, we collected survey data from 45 organizations that support young children and their families, including nonprofits, health care clinics, and early childhood education centers, among others.
RESULTS
On average, nonprofit organizations had relationships with a greater percentage of network members than other types of organizations. Network members engaged in relationships focused on a wide range of activities (e.g., client assessments, sharing information, providing services), with some organizational types leading the network in certain activities. Scores across all dimensions of trust and value were above 3 (range: 2.1-3.8), which is advantageous for a network and network relationships existed across a range of relational intensities (from awareness to organizational integration).
DISCUSSION
Nonprofit organizations that reported high levels of connectedness in the network were able to effectively mobilize the ACEs network. Health clinics participated in a greater share of relationships involving assessment, service provision, and tool sharing than other types of organizations. As such, health care clinics may serve as leaders in directly serving children and families experiencing ACEs in rural communities. The rural context may also explain high levels of trust and value, which can serve as assets for future network development and mobilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).