分析化学、微生物学和检验医学中的能力测试:关于当前实践和未来方向的讨论

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Brian Brookman, Csilla Bélavári, Owen Butler, Raquel Múrtula Corbí, Monika Horsky, Heather Jordan, Caroline Laurent, Marina Patriarca, Ulla Tiikkainen, Kees van Putten, Piotr Robouch, Erika Sárkány, Angela Sorbo
{"title":"分析化学、微生物学和检验医学中的能力测试:关于当前实践和未来方向的讨论","authors":"Brian Brookman,&nbsp;Csilla Bélavári,&nbsp;Owen Butler,&nbsp;Raquel Múrtula Corbí,&nbsp;Monika Horsky,&nbsp;Heather Jordan,&nbsp;Caroline Laurent,&nbsp;Marina Patriarca,&nbsp;Ulla Tiikkainen,&nbsp;Kees van Putten,&nbsp;Piotr Robouch,&nbsp;Erika Sárkány,&nbsp;Angela Sorbo","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01588-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A summary of the working group discussions on proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment (EQA) held at the Eurachem proficiency testing Workshop, Windsor, during September 2023 is provided. The working groups covered a range of issues concerned with current practice and future directions: the revision of ISO/IEC 17043; guidance on different methods for setting the standard deviation for proficiency assessment; collusion or falsification of results in PT/EQA; comparison of synthetic versus real PT items; performance assessment in non-quantitative PT/EQA; and risk analysis approach for PT/EQA participation. The discussions at the working groups were aided by a keynote lecture given on each of the topics on the same day. Delegates from forty-five countries attended the workshop and this diversity of backgrounds was represented on each of the working groups, capturing a range of views and experience from around the world and from a number of different analytical measurement sectors. Most of the working group participants were PT/EQA providers, participants in PT/EQA schemes and representatives of national accreditation bodies, including technical assessors. In addition, delegates from academia, PT/EQA software developers and test kit manufacturers were also present.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 5-6","pages":"381 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: discussions on current practice and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Brian Brookman,&nbsp;Csilla Bélavári,&nbsp;Owen Butler,&nbsp;Raquel Múrtula Corbí,&nbsp;Monika Horsky,&nbsp;Heather Jordan,&nbsp;Caroline Laurent,&nbsp;Marina Patriarca,&nbsp;Ulla Tiikkainen,&nbsp;Kees van Putten,&nbsp;Piotr Robouch,&nbsp;Erika Sárkány,&nbsp;Angela Sorbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-024-01588-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A summary of the working group discussions on proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment (EQA) held at the Eurachem proficiency testing Workshop, Windsor, during September 2023 is provided. The working groups covered a range of issues concerned with current practice and future directions: the revision of ISO/IEC 17043; guidance on different methods for setting the standard deviation for proficiency assessment; collusion or falsification of results in PT/EQA; comparison of synthetic versus real PT items; performance assessment in non-quantitative PT/EQA; and risk analysis approach for PT/EQA participation. The discussions at the working groups were aided by a keynote lecture given on each of the topics on the same day. Delegates from forty-five countries attended the workshop and this diversity of backgrounds was represented on each of the working groups, capturing a range of views and experience from around the world and from a number of different analytical measurement sectors. Most of the working group participants were PT/EQA providers, participants in PT/EQA schemes and representatives of national accreditation bodies, including technical assessors. In addition, delegates from academia, PT/EQA software developers and test kit manufacturers were also present.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"29 5-6\",\"pages\":\"381 - 389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01588-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01588-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是于二零一三年九月在温莎Eurachem水平测试工作坊举行的水平测试(PT)和外部质量评估(EQA)工作小组讨论的摘要。工作组讨论了一系列与当前做法和未来方向有关的问题:ISO/IEC 17043的修订;能力评估标准偏差设定的不同方法指南;PT/EQA结果串通或伪造;合成与真实PT项目的比较;非定量PT/EQA中的绩效评估;以及PT/EQA参与的风险分析方法。工作组的讨论得到了在同一天就每个主题进行的主题演讲的帮助。来自45个国家的代表参加了研讨会,每个工作组都代表了这种背景的多样性,从世界各地和许多不同的分析测量部门获取了一系列观点和经验。工作组的大多数参与者是技术培训/环境质量保证提供者、技术培训/环境质量保证计划的参与者和国家认可机构的代表,包括技术评审员。此外,来自学术界、PT/EQA软件开发人员和测试套件制造商的代表也出席了会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: discussions on current practice and future directions

A summary of the working group discussions on proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment (EQA) held at the Eurachem proficiency testing Workshop, Windsor, during September 2023 is provided. The working groups covered a range of issues concerned with current practice and future directions: the revision of ISO/IEC 17043; guidance on different methods for setting the standard deviation for proficiency assessment; collusion or falsification of results in PT/EQA; comparison of synthetic versus real PT items; performance assessment in non-quantitative PT/EQA; and risk analysis approach for PT/EQA participation. The discussions at the working groups were aided by a keynote lecture given on each of the topics on the same day. Delegates from forty-five countries attended the workshop and this diversity of backgrounds was represented on each of the working groups, capturing a range of views and experience from around the world and from a number of different analytical measurement sectors. Most of the working group participants were PT/EQA providers, participants in PT/EQA schemes and representatives of national accreditation bodies, including technical assessors. In addition, delegates from academia, PT/EQA software developers and test kit manufacturers were also present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信