医院疫情爆发支持小组在医院网络中实施感染风险扫描

T. Pilate, V. Cossey, V. Saegeman, A. Schuermans, I. Verstreken, R. Reybrouck, L. Vander Elst, M. Verelst
{"title":"医院疫情爆发支持小组在医院网络中实施感染风险扫描","authors":"T. Pilate, V. Cossey, V. Saegeman, A. Schuermans, I. Verstreken, R. Reybrouck, L. Vander Elst, M. Verelst","doi":"10.47671/tvg.80.24.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementation of the Infection Risk Scan in a hospital network by the Hospital Outbreak Support Team\n\n \n\nThe Infection Risk Scan (IRIS) assesses the quality of infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in a hospital ward by the standardized measurement of a broad range of quality indicators. IRIS was implemented in the geriatric wards of the 4 hospitals of the Plexus healthcare network ‘Oost-Vlaams-Brabant’ (Belgium). The goal was to compare the IPC and AMS policies of the hospitals in order to define common improvement strategies within the Hospital Outbreak Support Team (HOST), a federal project concerning IPC and AMS.\n\n \n\nIn the first part of IRIS, the risk profile of the patient population is determined by a point prevalence measurement of 4 variables. In the second part, the improvement plot is created based on the measurement of 7 quality indicators. Improvement actions can be deduced from quality indicators with higher improvement potentials.\n\n \n\nThe risk profiles of the 4 hospitals were highly comparable and the improvement plots showed an intermediate to high improvement potential for the use of AMT and hand hygiene compliance. There were important differences in the appropriate use of transurethral and intravascular catheters, with 2 hospitals having a low and 2 hospitals having a high improvement potential.\n\n \n\nIRIS was a useful tool in the early phase of the HOST project to benchmark the IPC and AMT policies between the Plexus hospitals and to decide what future projects could be collaborated on. As a result of IRIS, it was decided to define common care bundles for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract and blood stream infections and to determine hospital-specific actions with regard to the optimisation of AMS.","PeriodicalId":507632,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementatie van de Infectierisicoscan in een ziekenhuisnetwerk door het Hospital Outbreak Support Team\",\"authors\":\"T. Pilate, V. Cossey, V. Saegeman, A. Schuermans, I. Verstreken, R. Reybrouck, L. Vander Elst, M. Verelst\",\"doi\":\"10.47671/tvg.80.24.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Implementation of the Infection Risk Scan in a hospital network by the Hospital Outbreak Support Team\\n\\n \\n\\nThe Infection Risk Scan (IRIS) assesses the quality of infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in a hospital ward by the standardized measurement of a broad range of quality indicators. IRIS was implemented in the geriatric wards of the 4 hospitals of the Plexus healthcare network ‘Oost-Vlaams-Brabant’ (Belgium). The goal was to compare the IPC and AMS policies of the hospitals in order to define common improvement strategies within the Hospital Outbreak Support Team (HOST), a federal project concerning IPC and AMS.\\n\\n \\n\\nIn the first part of IRIS, the risk profile of the patient population is determined by a point prevalence measurement of 4 variables. In the second part, the improvement plot is created based on the measurement of 7 quality indicators. Improvement actions can be deduced from quality indicators with higher improvement potentials.\\n\\n \\n\\nThe risk profiles of the 4 hospitals were highly comparable and the improvement plots showed an intermediate to high improvement potential for the use of AMT and hand hygiene compliance. There were important differences in the appropriate use of transurethral and intravascular catheters, with 2 hospitals having a low and 2 hospitals having a high improvement potential.\\n\\n \\n\\nIRIS was a useful tool in the early phase of the HOST project to benchmark the IPC and AMT policies between the Plexus hospitals and to decide what future projects could be collaborated on. As a result of IRIS, it was decided to define common care bundles for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract and blood stream infections and to determine hospital-specific actions with regard to the optimisation of AMS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.80.24.021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.80.24.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院疫情支持小组在医院网络中实施感染风险扫描 感染风险扫描(IRIS)通过对一系列质量指标进行标准化测量,评估医院病房的感染预防与控制(IPC)和抗菌药物管理(AMS)质量。IRIS 在 Plexus 医疗保健网络 "Oost-Vlaams-Brabant"(比利时)的 4 家医院的老年病房中实施。其目的是比较各医院的 IPC 和 AMS 政策,以便在医院疫情支持小组(HOST)(一个有关 IPC 和 AMS 的联邦项目)内确定共同的改进策略。在 IRIS 的第一部分中,通过对 4 个变量进行点流行率测量来确定患者群体的风险状况。在第二部分,根据 7 项质量指标的测量结果绘制改进图。可以从改进潜力较大的质量指标中推导出改进行动。4 家医院的风险概况具有很高的可比性,改进图显示,AMT 的使用和手部卫生依从性具有中等到较高的改进潜力。在经尿道导管和血管内导管的合理使用方面存在重大差异,两家医院的改进潜力较低,两家医院的改进潜力较高。在 HOST 项目的早期阶段,IRIS 是一个非常有用的工具,可以为 Plexus 各家医院的 IPC 和 AMT 政策设定基准,并决定未来可以合作的项目。通过 IRIS,医院决定确定预防导尿管相关尿路感染和血流感染的共同护理包,并确定医院在优化 AMS 方面的具体行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementatie van de Infectierisicoscan in een ziekenhuisnetwerk door het Hospital Outbreak Support Team
Implementation of the Infection Risk Scan in a hospital network by the Hospital Outbreak Support Team The Infection Risk Scan (IRIS) assesses the quality of infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in a hospital ward by the standardized measurement of a broad range of quality indicators. IRIS was implemented in the geriatric wards of the 4 hospitals of the Plexus healthcare network ‘Oost-Vlaams-Brabant’ (Belgium). The goal was to compare the IPC and AMS policies of the hospitals in order to define common improvement strategies within the Hospital Outbreak Support Team (HOST), a federal project concerning IPC and AMS. In the first part of IRIS, the risk profile of the patient population is determined by a point prevalence measurement of 4 variables. In the second part, the improvement plot is created based on the measurement of 7 quality indicators. Improvement actions can be deduced from quality indicators with higher improvement potentials. The risk profiles of the 4 hospitals were highly comparable and the improvement plots showed an intermediate to high improvement potential for the use of AMT and hand hygiene compliance. There were important differences in the appropriate use of transurethral and intravascular catheters, with 2 hospitals having a low and 2 hospitals having a high improvement potential. IRIS was a useful tool in the early phase of the HOST project to benchmark the IPC and AMT policies between the Plexus hospitals and to decide what future projects could be collaborated on. As a result of IRIS, it was decided to define common care bundles for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract and blood stream infections and to determine hospital-specific actions with regard to the optimisation of AMS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信