尼日利亚麻风病人在麻风病人定居点的经历

G. Oke, Ifeanyi Nsofor, Bashar Abubakar, D. Lucero‐Prisno, Ademola Peter Sunday, Ernesto Oluwafemi Dibia, E. E. Elebesunu, Obadiah Okpokpo, Odinaka Kingsley Obeta, A. Babatunde, Adebowale Sylvester Adeyemi, P. Adeoye, Edith Nnenna Utaka
{"title":"尼日利亚麻风病人在麻风病人定居点的经历","authors":"G. Oke, Ifeanyi Nsofor, Bashar Abubakar, D. Lucero‐Prisno, Ademola Peter Sunday, Ernesto Oluwafemi Dibia, E. E. Elebesunu, Obadiah Okpokpo, Odinaka Kingsley Obeta, A. Babatunde, Adebowale Sylvester Adeyemi, P. Adeoye, Edith Nnenna Utaka","doi":"10.1002/puh2.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Nigeria achieved the national leprosy elimination target of less than 1/10,000 population in 1998, factors such as culture, behavioural patterns and social determinants, among others, continue to contribute to an increase in leprosy cases and a poor state of living for individuals with leprosy in Nigeria. This study delves into the experiences of individuals residing in leprosy settlements in Nigeria.This study employed a community‐based cross‐sectional design, utilizing a concurrent mixed‐methods approach for comprehensive data collection. Questionnaires, focus groups and interviews are conducted simultaneously. The research involves participants from seven leprosy communities across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones and Federal Capital Territory. Qualitative methods, including 14 focus group discussions and 6 key informant interviews, are complemented by quantitative questionnaires, engaging residents, leaders and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives. Respondents comprised 35 leprosy patients, 21 family members, 7 community leaders, 7 settlement officers and 2 organizational heads involved in leprosy control.The results indicate significant access to healthcare (93.7%) and interest in self‐care practices (95.2%), with a considerable proportion (74.6%) receiving free healthcare. Interview data underscore the limited government support, with NGOs and partners assuming a more substantial role. Qualitative insights from persons living with leprosy highlight financial struggles, stigmatization and substandard living conditions in settlements, exacerbated by limited government funding. This reliance on private and NGOs is further compounded by declining funding, hindering individuals’ ability to start businesses and provide self‐care.This study underscores the pressing need for increased government support, funding and better living conditions for individuals affected by leprosy in Nigeria. It highlights the significance of education, awareness campaigns and human rights promotion to combat stigma and enhance the quality of life for those living with leprosy. Moreover, the study advocates for the reintegration of affected individuals into their communities to foster societal inclusion and well‐being.","PeriodicalId":506750,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Challenges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of people living with leprosy at leprosy settlements in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"G. Oke, Ifeanyi Nsofor, Bashar Abubakar, D. Lucero‐Prisno, Ademola Peter Sunday, Ernesto Oluwafemi Dibia, E. E. Elebesunu, Obadiah Okpokpo, Odinaka Kingsley Obeta, A. Babatunde, Adebowale Sylvester Adeyemi, P. Adeoye, Edith Nnenna Utaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/puh2.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Nigeria achieved the national leprosy elimination target of less than 1/10,000 population in 1998, factors such as culture, behavioural patterns and social determinants, among others, continue to contribute to an increase in leprosy cases and a poor state of living for individuals with leprosy in Nigeria. This study delves into the experiences of individuals residing in leprosy settlements in Nigeria.This study employed a community‐based cross‐sectional design, utilizing a concurrent mixed‐methods approach for comprehensive data collection. Questionnaires, focus groups and interviews are conducted simultaneously. The research involves participants from seven leprosy communities across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones and Federal Capital Territory. Qualitative methods, including 14 focus group discussions and 6 key informant interviews, are complemented by quantitative questionnaires, engaging residents, leaders and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives. Respondents comprised 35 leprosy patients, 21 family members, 7 community leaders, 7 settlement officers and 2 organizational heads involved in leprosy control.The results indicate significant access to healthcare (93.7%) and interest in self‐care practices (95.2%), with a considerable proportion (74.6%) receiving free healthcare. Interview data underscore the limited government support, with NGOs and partners assuming a more substantial role. Qualitative insights from persons living with leprosy highlight financial struggles, stigmatization and substandard living conditions in settlements, exacerbated by limited government funding. This reliance on private and NGOs is further compounded by declining funding, hindering individuals’ ability to start businesses and provide self‐care.This study underscores the pressing need for increased government support, funding and better living conditions for individuals affected by leprosy in Nigeria. It highlights the significance of education, awareness campaigns and human rights promotion to combat stigma and enhance the quality of life for those living with leprosy. Moreover, the study advocates for the reintegration of affected individuals into their communities to foster societal inclusion and well‐being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Challenges\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管尼日利亚在 1998 年实现了全国消除麻风病的目标,即麻风病人的比例低于 1/10,000,但文化、行为模式和社会决定因素等因素仍在继续导致麻风病病例的增加,以及尼日利亚麻风病人的恶劣生活状况。本研究深入探讨了居住在尼日利亚麻风病人定居点的麻风病人的经历。本研究采用了基于社区的横断面设计,利用并行混合方法进行全面的数据收集。问卷调查、焦点小组讨论和访谈同时进行。参与研究的人员来自尼日利亚六个地缘政治区和联邦首都区的七个麻风病社区。定性方法包括 14 次焦点小组讨论和 6 次关键信息提供者访谈,并辅以定量问卷调查,让居民、领导和非政府组织(NGO)代表参与其中。受访者包括 35 名麻风病人、21 名家庭成员、7 名社区领袖、7 名安置官员和 2 名参与麻风病防治的组织负责人。结果表明,麻风病人获得医疗保健的比例(93.7%)和对自我保健方法的兴趣(95.2%)都很高,其中相当大的比例(74.6%)接受了免费医疗保健。访谈数据表明,政府的支持有限,非政府组织和合作伙伴发挥着更重要的作用。麻风病人的定性见解强调了经济困难、污名化以及居住区生活条件不达标等问题,而有限的政府资助又加剧了这些问题。本研究强调,尼日利亚麻风病人迫切需要政府提供更多支持、资金和更好的生活条件。研究强调了教育、宣传活动和人权促进对于消除耻辱感和提高麻风病人生活质量的重要意义。此外,研究还倡导麻风病人重新融入社区,以促进社会包容和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience of people living with leprosy at leprosy settlements in Nigeria
Although Nigeria achieved the national leprosy elimination target of less than 1/10,000 population in 1998, factors such as culture, behavioural patterns and social determinants, among others, continue to contribute to an increase in leprosy cases and a poor state of living for individuals with leprosy in Nigeria. This study delves into the experiences of individuals residing in leprosy settlements in Nigeria.This study employed a community‐based cross‐sectional design, utilizing a concurrent mixed‐methods approach for comprehensive data collection. Questionnaires, focus groups and interviews are conducted simultaneously. The research involves participants from seven leprosy communities across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones and Federal Capital Territory. Qualitative methods, including 14 focus group discussions and 6 key informant interviews, are complemented by quantitative questionnaires, engaging residents, leaders and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives. Respondents comprised 35 leprosy patients, 21 family members, 7 community leaders, 7 settlement officers and 2 organizational heads involved in leprosy control.The results indicate significant access to healthcare (93.7%) and interest in self‐care practices (95.2%), with a considerable proportion (74.6%) receiving free healthcare. Interview data underscore the limited government support, with NGOs and partners assuming a more substantial role. Qualitative insights from persons living with leprosy highlight financial struggles, stigmatization and substandard living conditions in settlements, exacerbated by limited government funding. This reliance on private and NGOs is further compounded by declining funding, hindering individuals’ ability to start businesses and provide self‐care.This study underscores the pressing need for increased government support, funding and better living conditions for individuals affected by leprosy in Nigeria. It highlights the significance of education, awareness campaigns and human rights promotion to combat stigma and enhance the quality of life for those living with leprosy. Moreover, the study advocates for the reintegration of affected individuals into their communities to foster societal inclusion and well‐being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信