STEM 教育的全球视角和方法创新:基于工程设计的教师培训的系统制图分析

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Mohamed A. Shahat, Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi, Shubair Abdullah, Mohammed Al-Amri
{"title":"STEM 教育的全球视角和方法创新:基于工程设计的教师培训的系统制图分析","authors":"Mohamed A. Shahat, Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi, Shubair Abdullah, Mohammed Al-Amri","doi":"10.1108/agjsr-07-2023-0304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study investigates a novel educational strategy in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) teaching that integrates the engineering design process (EDP) as a framework. The strategy aims to help teachers explain STEM concepts in a simplified way. We employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to enable a systematic review that evaluated the effectiveness of this approach in improving both teaching and learning in STEM subjects.Design/methodology/approachIn order to fulfill the objectives of the review, key data were extracted from each of the 400 articles that were reviewed from three databases: Scopus, ProQuest Central and EBSCO. Two types of analysis were conducted, namely descriptive analysis and literature classification.FindingsThis systematic review analyzed 44 articles on the EDP, focusing on 18 detailed studies mainly from ProQuest, SCOPUS and EBSCO. It revealed a limited focus on gender’s impact on EDP and a trend toward interdisciplinary use and integrated research approaches. The study underscores the need for further exploration of demographic influences and preparation programs in EDP across various disciplines, aiming to inform future research and educational policies.Originality/valueThe study’s value lies in its comprehensive assessment of engineering design (ED) research over the past decade, serving as a key reference point. It highlights progress in the field, consolidates findings and provides insights into the field’s evolution, guiding future research directions in ED.","PeriodicalId":50978,"journal":{"name":"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research","volume":"275 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global perspectives and methodological innovations in STEM education: a systematic mapping analysis of engineering design-based teacher training\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed A. Shahat, Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi, Shubair Abdullah, Mohammed Al-Amri\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/agjsr-07-2023-0304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study investigates a novel educational strategy in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) teaching that integrates the engineering design process (EDP) as a framework. The strategy aims to help teachers explain STEM concepts in a simplified way. We employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to enable a systematic review that evaluated the effectiveness of this approach in improving both teaching and learning in STEM subjects.Design/methodology/approachIn order to fulfill the objectives of the review, key data were extracted from each of the 400 articles that were reviewed from three databases: Scopus, ProQuest Central and EBSCO. Two types of analysis were conducted, namely descriptive analysis and literature classification.FindingsThis systematic review analyzed 44 articles on the EDP, focusing on 18 detailed studies mainly from ProQuest, SCOPUS and EBSCO. It revealed a limited focus on gender’s impact on EDP and a trend toward interdisciplinary use and integrated research approaches. The study underscores the need for further exploration of demographic influences and preparation programs in EDP across various disciplines, aiming to inform future research and educational policies.Originality/valueThe study’s value lies in its comprehensive assessment of engineering design (ED) research over the past decade, serving as a key reference point. It highlights progress in the field, consolidates findings and provides insights into the field’s evolution, guiding future research directions in ED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research\",\"volume\":\"275 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-07-2023-0304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-07-2023-0304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究调查了一种新颖的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教学策略,该策略将工程设计过程(EDP)作为一个框架。该策略旨在帮助教师以简化的方式解释 STEM 概念。我们采用了系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法,对该方法在改善 STEM 学科教学和学习方面的有效性进行了系统综述评估:Scopus、ProQuest Central 和 EBSCO。本系统性综述分析了 44 篇关于 EDP 的文章,重点关注主要来自 ProQuest、SCOPUS 和 EBSCO 的 18 项详细研究。研究表明,性别对 EDP 影响的关注有限,跨学科使用和综合研究方法是大势所趋。该研究强调,有必要进一步探讨各学科的人口统计学影响因素和 EDP 的准备计划,以便为未来的研究和教育政策提供参考依据。 原创性/价值 该研究的价值在于它对过去十年的工程设计(ED)研究进行了全面评估,是一个重要的参考点。它强调了该领域的进展,整合了研究成果,并对该领域的演变提供了见解,为工程设计领域未来的研究方向提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global perspectives and methodological innovations in STEM education: a systematic mapping analysis of engineering design-based teacher training
PurposeThis study investigates a novel educational strategy in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) teaching that integrates the engineering design process (EDP) as a framework. The strategy aims to help teachers explain STEM concepts in a simplified way. We employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to enable a systematic review that evaluated the effectiveness of this approach in improving both teaching and learning in STEM subjects.Design/methodology/approachIn order to fulfill the objectives of the review, key data were extracted from each of the 400 articles that were reviewed from three databases: Scopus, ProQuest Central and EBSCO. Two types of analysis were conducted, namely descriptive analysis and literature classification.FindingsThis systematic review analyzed 44 articles on the EDP, focusing on 18 detailed studies mainly from ProQuest, SCOPUS and EBSCO. It revealed a limited focus on gender’s impact on EDP and a trend toward interdisciplinary use and integrated research approaches. The study underscores the need for further exploration of demographic influences and preparation programs in EDP across various disciplines, aiming to inform future research and educational policies.Originality/valueThe study’s value lies in its comprehensive assessment of engineering design (ED) research over the past decade, serving as a key reference point. It highlights progress in the field, consolidates findings and provides insights into the field’s evolution, guiding future research directions in ED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research
Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信