Arman Saeedivahdat, Tohid Babaei, Nadereh Ariamanesh, Hadi Monzavi, Pouya Badri, Ali Nokhbeh
{"title":"骨骼 I 级和 III 级患者髁状突位置的 3D 评估:锥形束计算机断层扫描技术","authors":"Arman Saeedivahdat, Tohid Babaei, Nadereh Ariamanesh, Hadi Monzavi, Pouya Badri, Ali Nokhbeh","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present study aims to assess the differences in the condyle position for two skeletal classes using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) reconstructions for both sides and genders. \nMaterials and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the CBCT images of 96 patients (20-60 years) were assessed. The participants were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I and III). The variables of the Anterior-Posterior position of the Condyle (APC), condylar angle in the axial plane (ACA), the Lateral Position of the Condyle in the axial plane (LPC), the Vertical Position of the Condyle (VPC), condylar angle in coronal dimension (CCA), and the difference of APC and VPC on both sides were measured. The measurements were analyzed using a one‑way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. \nResults: The variables of APC, LPC, ACA, VDC, and the difference of the APC on both sides in the two skeletal classes were similar. The VPC and CCA were greater in Class III than in Class I. All variables representing the 3D position of the condyle were similar in men and women, as well as on the right and left in both skeletal classes, I and III. \nConclusion: Based on the 3D evaluation results of the condylar position, the skeletal classes III and I differed in the VPC and CCA; however, for the rest variables, there were no statistical differences.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"38 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 3D Evaluation of Condyle Position of Skeletal Class I and III Patients: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Technique\",\"authors\":\"Arman Saeedivahdat, Tohid Babaei, Nadereh Ariamanesh, Hadi Monzavi, Pouya Badri, Ali Nokhbeh\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The present study aims to assess the differences in the condyle position for two skeletal classes using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) reconstructions for both sides and genders. \\nMaterials and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the CBCT images of 96 patients (20-60 years) were assessed. The participants were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I and III). The variables of the Anterior-Posterior position of the Condyle (APC), condylar angle in the axial plane (ACA), the Lateral Position of the Condyle in the axial plane (LPC), the Vertical Position of the Condyle (VPC), condylar angle in coronal dimension (CCA), and the difference of APC and VPC on both sides were measured. The measurements were analyzed using a one‑way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. \\nResults: The variables of APC, LPC, ACA, VDC, and the difference of the APC on both sides in the two skeletal classes were similar. The VPC and CCA were greater in Class III than in Class I. All variables representing the 3D position of the condyle were similar in men and women, as well as on the right and left in both skeletal classes, I and III. \\nConclusion: Based on the 3D evaluation results of the condylar position, the skeletal classes III and I differed in the VPC and CCA; however, for the rest variables, there were no statistical differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies\",\"volume\":\"38 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对两侧和两性的髁突位置进行重建,以评估两种骨骼等级的髁突位置差异。材料与方法:在这项横断面描述性研究中,对 96 名患者(20-60 岁)的 CBCT 图像进行了评估。根据患者的角度错合畸形分类(角度等级 I 和 III)对其进行了划分。测量的变量包括髁突的前后位置(APC)、髁突在轴面上的角度(ACA)、髁突在轴面上的侧面位置(LPC)、髁突的垂直位置(VPC)、髁突在冠状面上的角度(CCA)以及两侧 APC 和 VPC 的差异。测量结果采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验进行分析。结果两组骨骼的 APC、LPC、ACA、VDC 变量及两侧 APC 差值相似。代表髁状突三维位置的所有变量在男性和女性中,以及在骨骼等级 I 和 III 中的右侧和左侧都相似。结论根据髁状突位置的三维评估结果,骨骼III级和I级在VPC和CCA方面存在差异;但在其他变量方面,没有统计学差异。
A 3D Evaluation of Condyle Position of Skeletal Class I and III Patients: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Technique
Purpose: The present study aims to assess the differences in the condyle position for two skeletal classes using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) reconstructions for both sides and genders.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the CBCT images of 96 patients (20-60 years) were assessed. The participants were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I and III). The variables of the Anterior-Posterior position of the Condyle (APC), condylar angle in the axial plane (ACA), the Lateral Position of the Condyle in the axial plane (LPC), the Vertical Position of the Condyle (VPC), condylar angle in coronal dimension (CCA), and the difference of APC and VPC on both sides were measured. The measurements were analyzed using a one‑way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.
Results: The variables of APC, LPC, ACA, VDC, and the difference of the APC on both sides in the two skeletal classes were similar. The VPC and CCA were greater in Class III than in Class I. All variables representing the 3D position of the condyle were similar in men and women, as well as on the right and left in both skeletal classes, I and III.
Conclusion: Based on the 3D evaluation results of the condylar position, the skeletal classes III and I differed in the VPC and CCA; however, for the rest variables, there were no statistical differences.